Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Virol. 2018 Jul 31;92(16). doi: 10.1128/JVI.00754-18. Print 2018 Aug 15.
Influenza A and B viruses can continuously evade humoral immune responses by developing mutations in the globular head of the hemagglutinin (HA) that prevent antibody binding. However, the influenza B virus HA over time displays less antigenic variation despite being functionally and structurally similar to the influenza A virus HA. To determine if the influenza B virus HA is under constraints that limit its antigenic variation, we performed a transposon screen to compare the mutational tolerance of the currently circulating influenza A virus HAs (H1 and H3 subtypes) and influenza B virus HAs (B/Victoria87 and B/Yamagata88 antigenic lineages). A library of insertional mutants for each HA was generated and deep sequenced after passaging to determine where insertions were tolerated in replicating viruses. The head domains of both viruses tolerated transposon mutagenesis, but the influenza A virus head was more tolerant to insertions than the influenza B virus head domain. Furthermore, all five of the known antigenic sites of the influenza A virus HA were tolerant of 15 nucleotide insertions, while insertions were detected in only two of the four antigenic sites in the influenza B virus head domain. Our analysis demonstrated that the influenza B virus HA is inherently less tolerant of transposon-mediated insertions than the influenza A virus HA. The reduced insertional tolerance of the influenza B virus HA may reveal genetic restrictions resulting in a lower capacity for antigenic evolution. Influenza viruses cause seasonal epidemics and result in significant human morbidity and mortality. Influenza viruses persist in the human population through generating mutations in the hemagglutinin head domain that prevent antibody recognition. Despite the similar selective pressures on influenza A and B viruses, influenza A virus displays a higher rate and breadth of antigenic variability than influenza B virus. A transposon mutagenesis screen was used to examine if the reduced antigenic variability of influenza B virus was due to inherent differences in mutational tolerance. This study demonstrates that the influenza A virus head domain and the individual antigenic sites targeted by humoral responses are more tolerant to insertions than those of influenza B virus. This finding sheds light on the genetic factors controlling the antigenic evolution of influenza viruses.
甲型和乙型流感病毒通过在血凝素(HA)的球形头部发生突变,从而阻止抗体结合,不断逃避体液免疫反应。然而,尽管乙型流感病毒 HA 在功能和结构上与甲型流感病毒 HA 相似,但随着时间的推移,其抗原性变异却较少。为了确定乙型流感病毒 HA 是否受到限制其抗原性变异的限制,我们进行了转座子筛选,以比较当前流行的甲型流感病毒 HA(H1 和 H3 亚型)和乙型流感病毒 HA(B/Victoria87 和 B/Yamagata88 抗原谱系)的突变耐受性。为每个 HA 生成了插入突变体文库,并在传代后进行深度测序,以确定复制病毒中可耐受插入的位置。两种病毒的头部区域都耐受转座子诱变,但甲型流感病毒头部比乙型流感病毒头部更耐受插入。此外,甲型流感病毒 HA 的五个已知抗原位点都耐受 15 个核苷酸的插入,而在乙型流感病毒头部区域的四个抗原位点中仅检测到两个插入。我们的分析表明,乙型流感病毒 HA 比甲型流感病毒 HA 固有地更不能耐受转座子介导的插入。乙型流感病毒 HA 的插入耐受性降低可能揭示了遗传限制,导致其抗原进化能力降低。流感病毒会引起季节性流行,并导致人类发病率和死亡率显著增加。流感病毒通过在血凝素头部区域产生阻止抗体识别的突变而在人群中持续存在。尽管甲型和乙型流感病毒受到相似的选择性压力,但甲型流感病毒的抗原变异性率和广度都高于乙型流感病毒。转座子诱变筛选用于检查乙型流感病毒抗原变异性降低是否是由于突变耐受性的固有差异所致。本研究表明,甲型流感病毒头部区域和针对体液反应的单个抗原位点比乙型流感病毒更能耐受插入。这一发现揭示了控制流感病毒抗原进化的遗传因素。