Suppr超能文献

单就诊根管治疗中使用连续旋转系统、往复系统和自调式锉系统后术后疼痛发生率的比较:一项前瞻性随机临床试验。

Comparison of the incidence of postoperative pain after using a continuous rotary system, a reciprocating system, and a Self-Adjusting File system in single-visit endodontics: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

作者信息

Saha Suparna Ganguly, Gupta Rudra Kumar, Bhardwaj Anuj, Misuriya Abhinav, Saha Mainak Kanti, Nirwan Amit Singh

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dental Science and Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dental Science and Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2018 May-Jun;21(3):333-338. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_336_17.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this study is to compare the incidence of postoperative pain using the ProTaper Next (PTN), WaveOne Gold (WOG), and Self-Adjusting File (SAF) systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred and fourteen patients with irreversible pulpitis were selected for single-visit endodontics. The teeth were blindly assigned to three groups based on the instrumentation system used: Group A (PTN), Group B (WOG), and Group C (SAF). Participants were asked to note the incidence of the pre- and postoperative pain on a visual analog scale at different time intervals. Paired -test and one-way ANOVA were used along with Tukey's test.

RESULTS

The greatest mean pain in Group A (PTN) and Group B (WOG) was found to be maximum in the first 24 h with a significant reduction in pain at the subsequent observation time points of 48 h, 72 h, and 7 days. Group C (SAF) showed minimum pain followed by Group B followed by Group A which showed comparatively higher pain scores even at the end of 7 days.

CONCLUSIONS

In single-visit endodontics, SAF system may prove to be a better system compared with PTN and WOG as it produces minimal postoperative pain, thus improving the overall acceptance of endodontic treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较使用ProTaper Next(PTN)、WaveOne Gold(WOG)和自调式锉(SAF)系统术后疼痛的发生率。

材料与方法

选择214例患有不可逆性牙髓炎的患者进行一次性根管治疗。根据所使用的器械系统将牙齿随机分为三组:A组(PTN)、B组(WOG)和C组(SAF)。要求参与者在不同时间间隔使用视觉模拟量表记录术前和术后疼痛的发生率。采用配对t检验和单因素方差分析以及Tukey检验。

结果

发现A组(PTN)和B组(WOG)在最初24小时内平均疼痛程度最高,在随后48小时、72小时和7天的观察时间点疼痛显著减轻。C组(SAF)疼痛程度最低,其次是B组,A组即使在7天结束时疼痛评分仍相对较高。

结论

在一次性根管治疗中,与PTN和WOG相比,SAF系统可能是更好的系统,因为它产生的术后疼痛最小,从而提高了根管治疗的总体接受度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab7b/5977786/7846d09a795a/JCD-21-333-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验