• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术治疗多肾盏及多发性肾结石的比较

Comparision of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery For The Treatment of Multicalyceal and Multiple Renal Stones.

作者信息

Demirbas Arif, Yazar Veli Mert, Ersoy Erim, Demir Demirhan Orsan, Ozcan Serkan, Karakan Tolga, Doluoglu Omer Gokhan, Resorlu Berkan, Hascicek Ahmet Metin, Gunseren Kadir Omur

机构信息

Department of Urology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Urology, İnegöl State Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.

出版信息

Urol J. 2018 Nov 17;15(6):318-322. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4213.

DOI:10.22037/uj.v0i0.4213
PMID:29900522
Abstract

PURPOSE

Comparison of efficiency and reliability of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in treatment of multicalyceal and multiple renal stones in the same renal unit.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2011 and 2015, records of patients who underwent surgery for renal stone were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had multiple stones located in different calices in the same renal unit were included. The patients that underwent PNL and RIRS were defined as Group I and Group II, respectively. Patient criteria (age,sex); the stone characteristics; time of procedure, fluoroscopy and hospitalization; stone-free and complication rates of groups were evaluated between the treatment groups.

RESULT

There were no significant differences in terms of age, gender, BMI, laterality, number of stones, number of stone localization, hounsfield units and surface area characteristics of the stone between the PNL (n = 47) and RIRS (n = 35) groups (P = .558, P = .278, P = .375, P = 0.051, P = .053, P = .064, P = .642, P = .080, respectively). Stone free rate was 59.6% (n=28) in PNL, and 88.6% (n=31) in RIRS (P=.004). 1st or 2nd degree complications according to Modified Clavien Classification developed in 10 patients (21.3%) in Group I and 1 patient (2.9%) in Group II (P = .015). The 3A or 3B complications were similar in groups (P = .077). Time of procedure, fluoroscopy and hospitalization were significantly lower in Group II (P < .001, P < .001 and P < .001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

RIRS is more effective and more reliable procedure than PNL with higher stone-free and lower complication rates in treatment of multicalyceal and multiple stone in the same renal unit.

摘要

目的

比较经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)和逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗同一肾单位多肾盏及多发肾结石的效率和可靠性。

材料与方法

回顾性分析2011年至2015年间接受肾结石手术患者的记录。纳入同一肾单位不同肾盏存在多发结石的患者。接受PNL和RIRS的患者分别定义为I组和II组。评估治疗组之间的患者标准(年龄、性别);结石特征;手术时间、透视时间和住院时间;结石清除率和并发症发生率。

结果

PNL组(n = 47)和RIRS组(n = 35)在年龄、性别、BMI、患侧、结石数量、结石定位数量、亨氏单位和结石表面积特征方面无显著差异(P值分别为0.558、0.278、0.375、0.051、0.053、0.064、0.642、0.080)。PNL组的结石清除率为59.6%(n = 28),RIRS组为88.6%(n = 31)(P = 0.004)。I组10例患者(21.3%)和II组1例患者(2.9%)发生了根据改良Clavien分类的1级或2级并发症(P = 0.015)。3A或3B级并发症在两组中相似(P = 0.077)。II组的手术时间、透视时间和住院时间显著更短(P值分别<0.001、<0.001和<0.001)。

结论

在治疗同一肾单位的多肾盏及多发结石时,RIRS比PNL更有效、更可靠,结石清除率更高,并发症发生率更低。

相似文献

1
Comparision of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery For The Treatment of Multicalyceal and Multiple Renal Stones.经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术治疗多肾盏及多发性肾结石的比较
Urol J. 2018 Nov 17;15(6):318-322. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4213.
2
Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in multiple calyceal stones: A match pair analysis of 190 cases.对比逆行性肾内手术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗多发肾盏结石:190 例配对分析。
Arch Esp Urol. 2021 Mar;74(2):247-253.
3
Comparison of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for Renal Pelvic Stones of 2-3 cm.2-3cm 肾盂结石的微创经皮肾镜取石术与逆行性肾内手术比较。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021 Jun;31(6):605-609. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0860. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
4
A Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Management of Renal Stones ?2 CM.逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径≥2厘米肾结石的比较
Urol J. 2017 Jan 18;14(1):2949-2954.
5
Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones.比较逆行性肾内手术、体外冲击波碎石术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗中等大小透光性肾结石。
World J Urol. 2013 Dec;31(6):1581-6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0991-1. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
6
Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: Which is more effective for 10-20 mm renal stones in children?微创经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术的比较:哪种方法对儿童10 - 20毫米肾结石更有效?
Arch Esp Urol. 2020 Sep;73(7):643-650.
7
Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Methods in Treatment of Upper Calyceal Stones of 10-20 mm.逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗10 - 20毫米肾上盏结石的方法比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Dec;27(12):1293-1298. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0634. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
8
Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus a single-session percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole stones with a diameter of 15 to 30 mm: A propensity score-matching study.逆行性肾内手术与一期经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径15至30毫米下极结石的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Korean J Urol. 2015 Jul;56(7):525-32. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.7.525. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
9
Flexible Ureterorenoscopy versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Treatment of Renal Stones.输尿管软镜与微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石的对比
Urol J. 2018 Nov 17;15(6):313-317. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4208.
10
Which Should be Preferred for Moderate-Size Kidney Stones? Ultramini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy or Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery?中等大小肾结石应首选哪种治疗方法?超微经皮肾镜取石术还是逆行性肾内手术?
J Endourol. 2016 Dec;30(12):1285-1289. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0370.

引用本文的文献

1
Reporting the Impact of Pelvicalyceal System (PCS) Anatomy on Clinical Outcomes in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) Studies: Can We Do Better? - Methodological Review from the Section of EAU Endourology.报告肾盂肾盏系统(PCS)解剖结构对逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)研究临床结果的影响:我们能否做得更好?——欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)腔内泌尿外科分会的方法学综述
Urol Res Pract. 2025 May 21;51(1):12-21. doi: 10.5152/tud.2025.25032.
2
New infundibulopelvic angle measurement method can predict stone-free rates following retrograde intrarenal surgery.新的漏斗肾盂角测量方法可预测逆行性肾内手术后的无石率。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 30;14(1):9891. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60248-7.
3
Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment for multiple nephrolithiasis.
输尿管软镜与微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗多发性肾结石的比较。
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 9;9:1004432. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1004432. eCollection 2022.
4
Validation of S.T.O.N.E nephrolithometry and Guy's stone score for predicting surgical outcome after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.验证S.T.O.N.E肾石测量法和盖氏结石评分对经皮肾镜取石术后手术结果的预测价值。
Urol Ann. 2020 Oct-Dec;12(4):324-330. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_136_19. Epub 2020 Aug 10.