• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对比逆行性肾内手术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗多发肾盏结石:190 例配对分析。

Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in multiple calyceal stones: A match pair analysis of 190 cases.

机构信息

Department of Urology. Karabuk University School of Medicine. Karabuk. Turkey.

出版信息

Arch Esp Urol. 2021 Mar;74(2):247-253.

PMID:33650540
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The current nephrolithia-sis guidelines have no recommendation about multiple calyceal stones treatment. We aimed to compare the results of two effective methods of RIRS and PNL operations in the treatment of multicalyx stones.

METHODS

Data of patients who underwent RIRS or PNL for multicalyx stones between September 2014 and May 2019 in our clinic were evaluated retrospectively. In both groups, stone-free and complication rates, hospital stay, scopy times, and operation times were examined. In RIRS group, the number of sessions and total stone-free rates at the end of each session were evaluated separately.

RESULTS

A total of 162 patients in the RIRS group, and 103 patients in the PNL group were evaluated. After the match pair 1:1, data of 95 patients were selected in each group. Stone burden, number, density, ASA scores, BMI were similar in both groups. At the end of the first session RIRS, 59 (62.1%) patients became stone-free, while in the PNL group 73 (76.8%) patients (p: 0.027). The statistical analysis showed that the stone-free rates obtained in the second sessions in the RIRS group were similar to those of the PNL group. After a total of 124 sessions of RIRS, a stone-free rate of 81.1% was achieved by 1.3 sessions on average.

CONCLUSION

At least two session of RIRS is as effective as PNL on multiple calyceal stones. Stage RIRS can be an alternative to PNL at multicalyceal renal stones.

摘要

目的

目前的肾结石治疗指南对多发肾盂结石的治疗没有推荐意见。我们旨在比较 RIRS 和 PNL 两种有效方法治疗多肾盂结石的结果。

方法

回顾性分析 2014 年 9 月至 2019 年 5 月在我院行 RIRS 或 PNL 治疗的多肾盂结石患者的资料。在两组中,检查了结石清除率和并发症发生率、住院时间、镜检次数和手术时间。在 RIRS 组中,分别评估了每个疗程的次数和结束时的总结石清除率。

结果

RIRS 组共 162 例,PNL 组 103 例。匹配 1:1 后,每组各选择 95 例患者的数据。两组的结石负荷、数量、密度、ASA 评分、BMI 相似。在 RIRS 组的第一次治疗结束时,59 例(62.1%)患者结石清除,而 PNL 组有 73 例(76.8%)(p:0.027)。统计分析显示,RIRS 组第二次治疗获得的结石清除率与 PNL 组相似。经过总共 124 次 RIRS 治疗,平均 1.3 次治疗即可达到 81.1%的结石清除率。

结论

至少两次 RIRS 与 PNL 治疗多发肾盂结石一样有效。分期 RIRS 可作为多肾盂肾结石的 PNL 替代方案。

相似文献

1
Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in multiple calyceal stones: A match pair analysis of 190 cases.对比逆行性肾内手术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗多发肾盏结石:190 例配对分析。
Arch Esp Urol. 2021 Mar;74(2):247-253.
2
Comparison of miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: Which is more effective for 10-20 mm renal stones in children?微创经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术的比较:哪种方法对儿童10 - 20毫米肾结石更有效?
Arch Esp Urol. 2020 Sep;73(7):643-650.
3
Outcomes of different minimally invasive techniques in lower calyceal stones of 1 to 2 centimeters: A prospective, randomized study.1至2厘米下盏结石不同微创技术的疗效:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Arch Esp Urol. 2020 May;73(4):307-315.
4
Comparision of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery For The Treatment of Multicalyceal and Multiple Renal Stones.经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术治疗多肾盏及多发性肾结石的比较
Urol J. 2018 Nov 17;15(6):318-322. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4213.
5
A Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Management of Renal Stones ?2 CM.逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径≥2厘米肾结石的比较
Urol J. 2017 Jan 18;14(1):2949-2954.
6
Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus a single-session percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole stones with a diameter of 15 to 30 mm: A propensity score-matching study.逆行性肾内手术与一期经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径15至30毫米下极结石的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Korean J Urol. 2015 Jul;56(7):525-32. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.7.525. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
7
Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Methods For Management of Big- Sized Kidney Stones(? 4 cm): Single Center Retrospective Study.逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大尺寸肾结石(≥4 cm)的比较:单中心回顾性研究
Urol J. 2019 Jun 17;16(3):232-235. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4072.
8
Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery outcomes for kidney stones larger than 2 cm from Guy's stone scoring system perspective.从 Guy 结石评分系统角度比较大于 2cm 的肾结石经皮肾镜碎石取石术与逆行性肾内手术的疗效。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;75(12):e14956. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14956. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
9
Comparative study of retrograde intrarenal surgery and micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment of intermediate-sized kidney stones.逆行性肾内手术与微通道经皮肾镜取石术治疗中等大小肾结石的比较研究
Actas Urol Esp. 2014 Nov;38(9):576-83. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.04.004. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
10
Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones.比较逆行性肾内手术、体外冲击波碎石术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗中等大小透光性肾结石。
World J Urol. 2013 Dec;31(6):1581-6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0991-1. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Reporting the Impact of Pelvicalyceal System (PCS) Anatomy on Clinical Outcomes in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) Studies: Can We Do Better? - Methodological Review from the Section of EAU Endourology.报告肾盂肾盏系统(PCS)解剖结构对逆行性肾内手术(RIRS)研究临床结果的影响:我们能否做得更好?——欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)腔内泌尿外科分会的方法学综述
Urol Res Pract. 2025 May 21;51(1):12-21. doi: 10.5152/tud.2025.25032.
2
Comparison of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the treatment for multiple nephrolithiasis.输尿管软镜与微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗多发性肾结石的比较。
Front Surg. 2022 Sep 9;9:1004432. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1004432. eCollection 2022.