1 Division of Reconstructive Microsurgery, Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
2 Center for Tissue Engineering, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Tissue Eng Part A. 2018 Dec;24(23-24):1733-1741. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2018.0009. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
Periosteal osteogenic capacity can be exploited to enhance bone formation in the fields of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Despite this importance, there have been no studies examining the composition, structure, and osteogenic capacity of periostea from different bone sources. In this study, structure and osteogenic factor content were compared among periostea from rib, calvarial, femoral, and tibial bones, in which the native bones of these four regions were harvested and subjected to histological analysis. The osteogenic capacity of grafted periosteum was evaluated using an in vivo vascularized pedicle model of bone tissue engineering. Poly(ethylene glycol)-poly(l-lactic acid) (PEG-PLLA) copolymer hydrogels were seeded with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and implanted with grafted periosteum harvested from either calvarial or tibial bone, which were representative of thin and thick native periostea, respectively. The cambium layer thickness of periostea from the femoral and tibial bones (36.9% ± 2.5% and 36.8% ± 2.6%) was greater than that from the calvarial and rib bones (26.8% ± 2.4% and 25.5% ± 1.9%). The osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase levels were comparatively higher in the femoral and tibial periostea than those in periostea harvested from the calvarial and rib bones. The construct implanted with grafted tibial periosteum resulted in greater neo-bone regeneration and higher osteocalcin and alkaline phosphatase expression. This study is the first investigation of the osteogenic capacity of periostea from diverse sources. The results can be used to guide clinical strategies that exploit periostea for tissue engineering and clinical applications.
骨膜的成骨能力可被利用来增强组织工程和再生医学领域的骨形成。尽管这一点很重要,但目前还没有研究检查来自不同骨源的骨膜的组成、结构和成骨能力。在这项研究中,对肋骨、颅骨、股骨和胫骨的骨膜的结构和成骨因子含量进行了比较,其中这四个部位的天然骨被采集并进行了组织学分析。通过体内血管化的骨组织工程皮瓣模型评估了移植骨膜的成骨能力。将骨髓间充质干细胞种植在聚乙二醇-聚(L-乳酸)(PEG-PLLA)共聚物水凝胶中,并将分别来自颅骨和胫骨的移植骨膜植入其中,颅骨和胫骨的骨膜分别代表薄和厚的天然骨膜。股骨和胫骨骨膜的骨膜生发层厚度(36.9%±2.5%和 36.8%±2.6%)大于颅骨和肋骨的骨膜(26.8%±2.4%和 25.5%±1.9%)。与颅骨和肋骨骨膜相比,股骨和胫骨骨膜的骨钙素和碱性磷酸酶水平更高。植入移植胫骨骨膜的构建体导致更多的新骨再生以及更高的骨钙素和碱性磷酸酶表达。这项研究是首次对来自不同来源的骨膜的成骨能力进行的调查。研究结果可用于指导利用骨膜进行组织工程和临床应用的临床策略。