Garrison Garth, Leclair Timothy, Balla Agnes, Wagner Sarah, Butnor Kelly, Anderson Scott R, Kinsey C Matthew
Division of Pulmonary Critical Care.
Division of Interventional Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston MA.
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2018 Oct;25(4):269-273. doi: 10.1097/LBR.0000000000000526.
Although endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has an excellent diagnostic yield, there remain cases where the diagnosis is not obtained. We hypothesized that additional sampling with a 19-G EBUS-TBNA needle may increase diagnostic yield in a subset of cases where additional tissue sampling was required.
Indications for use of the 19-G needle following 22-G sampling with rapid on-site cytologic examination were: (1) diagnostic uncertainty of the on-site cytopathologist (eg, nondiagnostic, probable lymphoma, etc.), (2) non-small cell lung cancer with probable need for molecular genetic and/or PD-L1 testing, or (3) need for a larger tissue sample for consideration of inclusion in a research protocol.
A 19-G EBUS-TBNA needle was utilized following standard sampling with a 22-G needle in 48 patients (50 sites) during the same procedure. Although the diagnostic yield between the needles was equivalent, the concordance rate was only 83%. The 19-G determined a diagnosis in 4 additional patients (8%) and provided additional histopathologic information in 6 other cases (12%). Conversely, in 3 cases (6%) diagnostic information was provided only by the 22-G needle. Compared with 22-G EBUS-TBNA alone, sampling with both the 22- and 19-G EBUS needles resulted in an increase in diagnostic yield from 92% to 99% (P=0.045) and a number needed to sample of 13 patients to provide one additional diagnosis. There were no significant complications.
In select cases where additional tissue may be needed, sampling with a 19-G EBUS needle following standard aspiration with a 22-G needle results in an increase in diagnostic yield.
尽管支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸活检术(EBUS-TBNA)具有出色的诊断率,但仍有一些病例无法获得诊断结果。我们推测,在需要额外组织采样的部分病例中,使用19G EBUS-TBNA针进行额外采样可能会提高诊断率。
在使用22G针采样并进行快速现场细胞学检查后使用19G针的指征为:(1)现场细胞病理学家诊断不确定(例如,无法诊断、可能为淋巴瘤等),(2)可能需要进行分子遗传学和/或PD-L1检测的非小细胞肺癌,或(3)需要更大的组织样本以考虑纳入研究方案。
结果:在同一操作过程中,48例患者(50个部位)在使用22G针进行标准采样后使用了19G EBUS-TBNA针。尽管两种针的诊断率相当,但符合率仅为83%。19G针在另外4例患者(8%)中确定了诊断,并在其他6例病例(12%)中提供了额外的组织病理学信息。相反,在3例病例(6%)中,仅22G针提供了诊断信息。与单独使用22G EBUS-TBNA相比,同时使用22G和19G EBUS针采样使诊断率从92%提高到99%(P=0.045),每增加一例诊断需要对13例患者进行采样。没有显著并发症。
在某些可能需要额外组织的病例中,在使用22G针进行标准抽吸后使用19G EBUS针采样可提高诊断率。