Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.
Health Services and Policy Analysis Graduate Group, School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 14;13(6):e0196616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196616. eCollection 2018.
Cash and in-kind incentives can improve health outcomes in various settings; however, there is concern that incentives may 'crowd out' intrinsic motivation to engage in beneficial behaviors. We examined this hypothesis in a randomized trial of food and cash incentives for people living with HIV infection in Tanzania.
We analyzed data from 469 individuals randomized to one of three study arms: standard of care, short-term cash transfers, or short-term food assistance. Eligible participants were: 1) ≥18 years old; 2) HIV-infected; 3) food insecure; and 4) initiated antiretroviral therapy (ART) ≤90 days before the study. Food or cash transfers, valued at ~$11 per month and conditional on attending clinic visits, were provided for ≤6 months. Intrinsic motivation was measured at baseline, 6, and 12 months using the autonomous motivation section of the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ). We compared the change in TSRQ score from baseline to 6 and 12 months and the change within study arms.
The mean intrinsic motivation score was 2.79 at baseline (range: 1-3), 2.91 at 6 months (range: 1-3), and 2.95 at 12 months (range: 2-3), which was 6 months after the incentives had ended. Among all patients, the intrinsic motivation score increased by 0.13 points at 6 months (95% CI (0.09, 0.17), Cohen's d = 0.29) and 0.19 points at 12 months (95% CI (0.14, 0.24), Cohen's d = 0.49). Intrinsic motivation also increased within each study group at 6 months: 0.15 points in the food arm (95% CI (0.09, 0.21), Cohen's d = 0.37), 0.11 points in the cash arm (95% CI (0.05, 0.18), Cohen's d = 0.25), and 0.08 points in the comparison arm (95% CI (-0.03, 0.19), Cohen's d = 0.21); findings were similar at 12 months. Increases in motivation were statistically similar between arms at 6 and 12 months.
Intrinsic motivation for ART adherence increased significantly both overall and within the food and cash incentive arms, even after the incentive period was over. Increases in motivation did not differ by study group. These results suggest that incentive interventions for treatment adherence should not be withheld due to concerns of crowding out intrinsic motivation.
现金和实物激励措施可以改善各种环境下的健康结果;然而,有人担心激励措施可能会“挤出”参与有益行为的内在动机。我们在坦桑尼亚对接受 HIV 感染的人进行的一项关于食物和现金激励的随机试验中检验了这一假设。
我们分析了 469 名参与者的数据,他们被随机分配到三个研究组之一:标准护理、短期现金转移或短期食物援助。合格的参与者为:1)≥18 岁;2)感染 HIV;3)粮食不安全;4)在研究开始前≤90 天开始接受抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)。每月价值约 11 美元的食物或现金转移,有条件地在就诊时提供,最长可达 6 个月。内在动机在基线、6 个月和 12 个月使用治疗自我调节问卷(TSRQ)的自主动机部分进行测量。我们比较了从基线到 6 个月和 12 个月 TSRQ 评分的变化以及研究臂内的变化。
基线时内在动机平均得分为 2.79(范围:1-3),6 个月时为 2.91(范围:1-3),12 个月时为 2.95(范围:2-3),此时激励措施已经结束了 6 个月。在所有患者中,内在动机评分在 6 个月时增加了 0.13 分(95%CI(0.09,0.17),Cohen's d = 0.29),在 12 个月时增加了 0.19 分(95%CI(0.14,0.24),Cohen's d = 0.49)。每个研究组的内在动机也在 6 个月时增加:食物组增加 0.15 分(95%CI(0.09,0.21),Cohen's d = 0.37),现金组增加 0.11 分(95%CI(0.05,0.18),Cohen's d = 0.25),对照组增加 0.08 分(95%CI(-0.03,0.19),Cohen's d = 0.21);12 个月时的结果相似。在 6 个月和 12 个月时,动机的增加在各臂之间在统计学上没有差异。
总体而言,ART 依从性的内在动机在食物和现金激励组内均显著增加,即使在激励期结束后也是如此。动机的增加在研究组之间没有差异。这些结果表明,不应该因为担心挤出内在动机而不进行治疗依从性的激励干预。