McCoy Sandra I, Njau Prosper F, Fahey Carolyn, Kapologwe Ntuli, Kadiyala Suneetha, Jewell Nicholas P, Dow William H, Padian Nancy S
aDivision of Epidemiology, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA bPrevention of Mother-to-Child HIV Transmission Programme, Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Elderly, and Children, Dar es Salaam cRegional Medical Office, Ministry of Health, Community Development, Gender, Equity, and Children, Shinyanga, Tanzania dFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK eDivision of Biostatistics fDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
AIDS. 2017 Mar 27;31(6):815-825. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001406.
We evaluated the effectiveness of short-term cash and food assistance to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and retention in care among people living with HIV in Tanzania.
At three clinics, 805 participants were randomized to three groups in a 3 : 3 : 1 ratio, stratified by site : nutrition assessment and counseling (NAC) and cash transfers (∼$11/month, n = 347), NAC and food baskets (n = 345), and NAC-only (comparison group, n = 113, clinicaltrials.gov NCT01957917). Eligible people living with HIV were at least 18 years, initiated ART 90 days or less prior, and food insecure. Cash or food was provided for 6 or less consecutive months, conditional on visit attendance. The primary outcome was medication possession ratio (MPR ≥ 95%) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were appointment attendance and loss to follow-up (LTFU) at 6 and 12 months.
The primary intent-to-treat analysis included 800 participants. Achievement of MPR ≥ 95% at 6 months was higher in the NAC + cash group compared with NAC-only (85.0 vs. 63.4%), a 21.6 percentage point difference [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.8, 33.4, P < 0.01]. MPR ≥ 95% was also significantly higher in the NAC + food group vs. NAC-only (difference = 15.8, 95% CI: 3.8, 27.9, P < 0.01). When directly compared, MPR ≥ 95% was similar in the NAC + cash and NAC + food groups (difference = 5.7, 95% CI: -1.2, 12.7, P = 0.15). Compared with NAC-only, appointment attendance and LTFU were significantly higher in both the NAC + cash and NAC + food groups at 6 months. At 12 months, the effect of NAC + cash, but not NAC + food, on MPR ≥ 95% and retention was sustained.
Short-term conditional cash and food assistance improves ART possession and appointment attendance and reduces LTFU among food-insecure ART initiates in Tanzania.
我们评估了短期现金和食品援助对提高坦桑尼亚艾滋病毒感染者抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)依从性及维持治疗的有效性。
在三家诊所,805名参与者按3∶3∶1的比例随机分为三组,按地点分层:营养评估与咨询(NAC)加现金转移(约11美元/月,n = 347)、NAC加食品篮(n = 345)以及仅接受NAC(对照组,n = 113,clinicaltrials.gov NCT01957917)。符合条件的艾滋病毒感染者年龄至少18岁,在90天内或更短时间前开始接受ART治疗,且存在粮食不安全状况。根据就诊情况,连续6个月或更短时间提供现金或食品。主要结局指标是6个月时的药物持有率(MPR≥95%)。次要结局指标是6个月和12个月时的就诊率和失访率(LTFU)。
主要意向性分析纳入了800名参与者。NAC加现金组6个月时MPR≥95%的实现率高于仅接受NAC组(85.0%对63.4%),相差21.6个百分点[95%置信区间(CI):9.8,33.4,P<0.01]。NAC加食品组的MPR≥95%也显著高于仅接受NAC组(差值 = 15.8,95%CI:3.8,27.9,P<0.01)。直接比较时,NAC加现金组和NAC加食品组的MPR≥95%相似(差值 = 5.7,95%CI:-1.2,12.7,P = 0.15)。与仅接受NAC组相比,NAC加现金组和NAC加食品组6个月时的就诊率和LTFU均显著更高。在12个月时,NAC加现金组对MPR≥95%和维持治疗的效果得以持续,而NAC加食品组则不然。
短期有条件现金和食品援助可提高坦桑尼亚粮食不安全的ART初治患者的药物持有率和就诊率,并降低失访率。