Wasserstein David, Sheth Ujash
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, MG323 - 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, MG323 - 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
Clin Sports Med. 2018 Jul;37(3):483-494. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2018.03.002.
There has been a dramatic rise in the use of large-scale health administrative databases to investigate clinical outcomes within sports medicine over the past few years. Although these data sets identify large numbers of patients, allowing for the investigation of regional trends, health care utilization, and outcomes of surgical intervention, they were not designed with the intention of answering clinical questions. Recognizing the methodological limitations associated with these databases is prudent to avoid propagating spurious conclusions. This article offers an overview of the administrative databases commonly used within the orthopedic sports medicine literature and provides key principles for their critical appraisal.
在过去几年中,利用大规模健康管理数据库来研究运动医学临床结局的情况急剧增加。尽管这些数据集能识别大量患者,有助于研究区域趋势、医疗保健利用情况及手术干预的结局,但设计这些数据集并非为了回答临床问题。认识到与这些数据库相关的方法学局限性,对于避免传播虚假结论是审慎之举。本文概述了骨科运动医学文献中常用的管理数据库,并提供了对其进行批判性评估的关键原则。