Mancilla Asencio C, Gálvez-Arévalo L R, Tobar Almonacid E, Landskron-Ramos G, Madrid-Silva A M
Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Rev Gastroenterol Mex (Engl Ed). 2019 Apr-Jun;84(2):149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.rgmx.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
Critically ill patients present with a broad spectrum of gastrointestinal motility disorders that affect the digestive tract. Our aim was to compare the effect of two prokinetic drugs on gastric electrical rhythm in critically ill septic patients, measured through surface electrogastrography (EGG).
A prospective triple-blinded randomized study was conducted on 36 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with the diagnosis of septic shock. They were randomized to receive metoclopramide or domperidone. We assessed dominant frequency (DF), percentage distribution over time, and dominant power (DP), which represents the strength of contraction, before and after administration of the study drugs.
Reliable electrogastrograms were achieved in all patients. In relation to the distribution of DF over time, 64% of patients had dysrhythmia, the mean baseline DF was 2.9 cpm, and the mean DP was 56.5μv After drug administration, 58% of the patients had dysrhythmia, the mean DF increased to 5.7 cpm (P<.05), and the DP did not change (57.4μv). There were no significant differences between drugs. In the metoclopramide group, the baseline DF was 2.1 cpm and the baseline DP was 26.1μv. The post-drug values increased to 5.4 cpm and 34.1μv, respectively. In the domperidone group, the baseline DF was 3.7 cpm and the baseline DP was 86.9μv. After drug administration, the DF increased to 6.1 cpm and the DP decreased to 83.5μv.
Both metoclopramide and domperidone similarly increased the DF of gastric pacemaker activity and improved gastric motility by restoring a normogastric pattern. Gastric dysmotility is frequent in septic patients.
重症患者存在一系列影响消化道的胃肠动力障碍。我们的目的是通过体表胃电图(EGG)比较两种促动力药物对重症感染性休克患者胃电节律的影响。
对36例入住重症监护病房(ICU)且诊断为感染性休克的患者进行了一项前瞻性三盲随机研究。他们被随机分为接受甲氧氯普胺或多潘立酮治疗。我们在给予研究药物前后评估了主导频率(DF)、随时间的百分比分布以及代表收缩强度的主导功率(DP)。
所有患者均获得可靠的胃电图。关于DF随时间的分布,64%的患者存在心律失常,平均基线DF为2.9次/分钟,平均DP为56.5μv。给药后,58%的患者存在心律失常,平均DF增加至5.7次/分钟(P<0.05),而DP未改变(57.4μv)。两种药物之间无显著差异。在甲氧氯普胺组中,基线DF为2.1次/分钟,基线DP为26.1μv。给药后的值分别增加至5.4次/分钟和34.1μv。在多潘立酮组中,基线DF为3.7次/分钟,基线DP为86.9μv。给药后,DF增加至6.1次/分钟,DP降至83.5μv。
甲氧氯普胺和多潘立酮均同样增加了胃起搏器活动的DF,并通过恢复正常胃模式改善了胃动力。感染性休克患者中胃动力障碍很常见。