• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种因野火导致线路跳闸风险评估的模型设计。

A Model Design for Risk Assessment of Line Tripping Caused by Wildfires.

机构信息

School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China.

School of Electronic Information, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jun 14;18(6):1941. doi: 10.3390/s18061941.

DOI:10.3390/s18061941
PMID:29904035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6021827/
Abstract

A power line is particularly vulnerable to wildfires in its vicinity, and various damage including line tripping can be caused by wildfires. Using remote sensing techniques, a novel model developed to assess the risk of line tripping caused by the wildfire occurrence in high-voltage power line corridors is presented. This model mainly contains the wildfire risk assessment for power line corridors and the estimation of the probability of line tripping when a wildfire occurs in power line corridors. For the wildfire risk assessment, high-resolution satellite data, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data, meteorological data, and digital elevation model (DEM) data were employed to infer the natural factors. Human factors were also included to achieve good reliability. In the estimation of the probability of line tripping, vegetation characteristics, meteorological status, topographic conditions, and transmission line parameters were chosen as influencing factors. According to the above input variables and observed historical datasets, the risk levels for wildfire occurrence and line tripping were obtained with a logic regression approach. The experimental results demonstrate that the developed model can provide good results in predicting wildfire occurrence and line tripping for high-voltage power line corridors.

摘要

输电线特别容易受到附近野火的影响,各种损坏包括线路跳闸都可能由野火引起。利用遥感技术,提出了一种新的模型来评估高压输电线路走廊中因野火发生而导致线路跳闸的风险。该模型主要包括对输电线路走廊的野火风险评估,以及当野火发生在输电线路走廊时线路跳闸的概率估计。对于野火风险评估,使用高分辨率卫星数据、中分辨率成像光谱仪 (MODIS) 数据、气象数据和数字高程模型 (DEM) 数据来推断自然因素。还包括人为因素以达到良好的可靠性。在线路跳闸概率的估计中,选择植被特征、气象状况、地形条件和输电线路参数作为影响因素。根据上述输入变量和观测到的历史数据集,采用逻辑回归方法获得野火发生和线路跳闸的风险水平。实验结果表明,所开发的模型可以为高压输电线路走廊的野火发生和线路跳闸预测提供良好的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/443e/6021827/11b0983c6280/sensors-18-01941-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/443e/6021827/5ae38147d92c/sensors-18-01941-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/443e/6021827/68b0583c85e8/sensors-18-01941-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/443e/6021827/75c204e47b82/sensors-18-01941-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/443e/6021827/8f151fa03664/sensors-18-01941-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/443e/6021827/316633df3e8b/sensors-18-01941-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/443e/6021827/11b0983c6280/sensors-18-01941-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/443e/6021827/5ae38147d92c/sensors-18-01941-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/443e/6021827/68b0583c85e8/sensors-18-01941-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/443e/6021827/75c204e47b82/sensors-18-01941-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/443e/6021827/8f151fa03664/sensors-18-01941-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/443e/6021827/316633df3e8b/sensors-18-01941-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/443e/6021827/11b0983c6280/sensors-18-01941-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
A Model Design for Risk Assessment of Line Tripping Caused by Wildfires.一种因野火导致线路跳闸风险评估的模型设计。
Sensors (Basel). 2018 Jun 14;18(6):1941. doi: 10.3390/s18061941.
2
Wildfire Risk Assessment of Transmission-Line Corridors Based on Naïve Bayes Network and Remote Sensing Data.基于朴素贝叶斯网络和遥感数据的输电线路走廊野火风险评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 18;21(2):634. doi: 10.3390/s21020634.
3
A wildfire growth prediction and evaluation approach using Landsat and MODIS data.利用 Landsat 和 MODIS 数据的野火生长预测和评估方法。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Feb 15;304:114351. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114351. Epub 2021 Dec 21.
4
A multi-modal wildfire prediction and early-warning system based on a novel machine learning framework.基于新型机器学习框架的多模态野火预测和预警系统。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Sep 1;341:117908. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117908. Epub 2023 May 12.
5
Quantitative assessment of wildfire risk in oil facilities.量化评估油库的火灾风险。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Oct 1;223:433-443. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.062. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
6
Human activity, daylight saving time and wildfire occurrence.人类活动、夏令时与野火发生。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jul 20;727:138044. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138044. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
7
Characterizing wildfire regimes in the United States.描绘美国的野火状况。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Mar 29;102(13):4694-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500880102. Epub 2005 Mar 21.
8
Factors related to building loss due to wildfires in the conterminous United States.美国本土因野火造成建筑物损失的相关因素。
Ecol Appl. 2016 Oct;26(7):2323-2338. doi: 10.1002/eap.1376. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
9
Impact of wildfires on ozone exceptional events in the Western u.s.美国西部野火对臭氧异常事件的影响
Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Oct 1;47(19):11065-72. doi: 10.1021/es402164f. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
10
Satellite microwave detection of boreal forest recovery from the extreme 2004 wildfires in Alaska and Canada.卫星微波探测阿拉斯加和加拿大 2004 年特大森林火灾后的北方森林恢复情况。
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Oct;19(10):3111-22. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12288. Epub 2013 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Wildfire Risk Assessment of Transmission-Line Corridors Based on Naïve Bayes Network and Remote Sensing Data.基于朴素贝叶斯网络和遥感数据的输电线路走廊野火风险评估。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Jan 18;21(2):634. doi: 10.3390/s21020634.

本文引用的文献

1
Fire risk evaluation using multicriteria analysis--a case study.使用多准则分析法进行火灾风险评估——案例研究。
Environ Monit Assess. 2010 Jul;166(1-4):223-39. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-0997-3. Epub 2009 May 27.