Research Centre Borstel, National Reference Centre for Mycobacteria, Borstel, Germany.
Research Centre Borstel, National Reference Centre for Mycobacteria, Borstel, Germany.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Mar;25(3):379.e1-379.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2018.06.010. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
To determine MIC distributions for Mycobacterium chimaera, Mycobacterium intracellulare, Mycobacterium colombiense and Mycobacterium avium, and to derive tentative epidemiological cut-off (ECOFF) values.
A total of 683 bacterial isolates (M. chimaera, n = 203; M. intracellulare, n = 77; M. colombiense, n = 68; M. avium, n = 335) from 627 patients were tested by broth microdilution according to CLSI protocol M24-A2 on Sensititre RAPMYCOI plates. MICs were interpreted based on CLSI breakpoints for clarithromycin, and tentative breakpoints for amikacin, moxifloxacin and linezolid. Tentative ECOFFs were determined by visual approximation and the ECOFFinder algorithm.
Modal MIC, MIC and MIC values were within ± one dilution step from the respective aggregated data set for 47/48 (97.9%), 48/48 (100%) and 48/48 (100%) species-drug combinations. Clarithromycin wild-type populations were mostly classified as susceptible (MIC 4-8 mg/L; S ≤8 mg/L). Rifabutin MICs were lower than those of rifampicin. Tentative moxifloxacin, linezolid and amikacin breakpoints split wild-type populations. No ECOFFs could be set for rifampicin, ethambutol, ciprofloxacin, isoniazid, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and doxycycline because of truncation of MIC distributions. Agreement between the visually determined and the modelled 97.5% ECOFFs was 90.9%. All 99.0% ECOFFs were one titre step higher than by visual approximation.
Drug susceptibility patterns of M. chimaera are comparable to those of closely related species. Except for clarithromycin, breakpoints for Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare complex should be re-evaluated. Statistical determination of the 99.0% ECOFF may be superior to visual approximation.
确定分枝杆菌属 Chimera 种、分枝杆菌属细胞内种、分枝杆菌属 Colombiense 种和分枝杆菌属 avium 种的 MIC 分布,并推导暂定的流行病学临界值(ECOFF)值。
对 627 例患者的 683 株细菌分离株(分枝杆菌属 Chimera 种,n=203;分枝杆菌属细胞内种,n=77;分枝杆菌属 Colombiense 种,n=68;分枝杆菌属 avium 种,n=335)进行肉汤微量稀释法检测,根据 CLSI 方案 M24-A2 在 Sensititre RAPMYCOI 板上进行检测。根据 CLSI 克拉霉素的折点和暂定的阿米卡星、莫西沙星和利奈唑胺的折点来解释 MIC 值。通过视觉逼近和 ECOFFinder 算法确定暂定的 ECOFF 值。
在 47/48(97.9%)、48/48(100%)和 48/48(100%)的种-药物组合中,模态 MIC、MIC 和 MIC 值与各自的聚合数据集相差一个稀释度。克拉霉素野生型种群大多被归类为敏感(MIC4-8mg/L;S≤8mg/L)。利福布丁的 MIC 值低于利福平。暂定的莫西沙星、利奈唑胺和阿米卡星折点将野生型种群分开。由于 MIC 分布的截断,无法为利福平、乙胺丁醇、环丙沙星、异烟肼、甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲噁唑和强力霉素设定 ECOFF 值。通过视觉确定的和通过模型确定的 97.5%ECOFF 值之间的一致性为 90.9%。所有 99.0%ECOFF 值比视觉逼近高一个滴度级。
分枝杆菌属 Chimera 种的药物敏感性模式与密切相关的种相似。除克拉霉素外,应对分枝杆菌属 avium-intracellulare 复合体的折点进行重新评估。99.0%ECOFF 的统计学确定可能优于视觉逼近。