• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临终医疗支出:使用离散选择实验检验经济解释。

End-of-life healthcare expenditure: Testing economic explanations using a discrete choice experiment.

机构信息

Polynomics AG, Olten, Switzerland; University of Zurich, Switzerland.

Polynomics AG, Olten, Switzerland; University of Lucerne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2018 Jul;60:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.06.001
PMID:29906764
Abstract

Healthcare expenditure (HCE) spent during an individual's last year of life accounts for a high share of lifetime HCE. This finding is puzzling because an investment in health is unlikely to have a sufficiently long payback period. However, Becker et al. (2007) and Philipson et al. (2010) have advanced a theory designed to explain high willingness to pay (WTP) for an extension of life close to its end. Their testable implications are complemented by the concept of 'pain of risk bearing' introduced by Eeckhoudt and Schlesinger (2006). They are tested using a discrete choice experiment performed in 2014, involving 1,529 Swiss adults. An individual setting where the price attribute is substantial out-of-pocket payment for a novel drug for treatment of terminal cancer is distinguished from a societal one, where it is an increase in contributions to social health insurance. Most of the economic predictions receive empirical support.

摘要

在个人生命的最后一年中花费的医疗保健支出(HCE)占一生 HCE 的很大一部分。这一发现令人费解,因为对健康的投资不太可能有足够长的回报期。然而,Becker 等人(2007 年)和 Philipson 等人(2010 年)提出了一种旨在解释接近生命终点时对延长生命的高支付意愿(WTP)的理论。他们的可检验含义得到了 Eeckhoudt 和 Schlesinger(2006 年)提出的“风险承担痛苦”概念的补充。这些理论是使用 2014 年进行的一项离散选择实验来检验的,该实验涉及 1529 名瑞士成年人。一个个体设置,其中价格属性是为治疗晚期癌症的新型药物支付大量自付费用,与社会设置不同,社会设置是增加对社会健康保险的缴款。大多数经济预测都得到了实证支持。

相似文献

1
End-of-life healthcare expenditure: Testing economic explanations using a discrete choice experiment.临终医疗支出:使用离散选择实验检验经济解释。
J Health Econ. 2018 Jul;60:30-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
2
The value of a QALY towards the end of life and its determinants: Experimental evidence.生命终末期 QALY 的价值及其决定因素:实验证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2023 Jun;326:115909. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115909. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
3
Comparison of preferences for end-of-life care among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: A discrete choice experiment.晚期癌症患者及其照顾者对临终关怀的偏好比较:一项离散选择实验。
Palliat Med. 2015 Oct;29(9):842-50. doi: 10.1177/0269216315578803. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
4
Preferences for end-of-life care among community-dwelling older adults and patients with advanced cancer: A discrete choice experiment.社区居住的老年人和晚期癌症患者对临终关怀的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Health Policy. 2015 Nov;119(11):1482-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
5
Health care expenditure in the last months of life.生命最后几个月的医疗保健支出。
J Health Econ. 2000 Sep;19(5):679-95. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(00)00039-4.
6
Disparities in healthcare expenditures according to economic status in cancer patients undergoing end-of-life care.癌症患者临终关怀中根据经济状况的医疗支出差异。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Mar 22;22(1):303. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09373-y.
7
A Longitudinal Investigation of Willingness to Pay for Health Insurance in Germany.德国医疗保险支付意愿的纵向调查。
Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun;52(3):1099-1117. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12522. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
8
Willingness to accept versus willingness to pay in a discrete choice experiment.离散选择实验中的接受意愿与支付意愿
Value Health. 2008 Dec;11(7):1110-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00340.x. Epub 2008 May 16.
9
Cost trajectories from the final life year reveal intensity of end-of-life care and can help to guide palliative care interventions.生命最后一年的费用轨迹揭示了临终护理的强度,并有助于指导姑息治疗干预措施。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2018 Sep;8(3):325-334. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000784. Epub 2015 Oct 15.
10
Willingness to pay for other individuals' healthcare expenditures.为他人医疗支出付费的意愿。
Public Health. 2017 Mar;144:64-69. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2016.11.013. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Current landscape of US Food and Drug Administration use of expedited regulatory approvals for colorectal cancer care.美国食品药品监督管理局对结直肠癌治疗使用加速监管批准的现状。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Sep;31(9):929-936. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.9.929.
2
QALY-type preference and willingness-to-pay among end-of-life patients with cancer treatments: a pilot study using discrete choice experiment.癌症终末期患者对癌症治疗的质量调整生命年(QALY)类型偏好及支付意愿:一项使用离散选择实验的试点研究
Qual Life Res. 2024 Mar;33(3):753-765. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03562-3. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
3
The 'Red Herring' Hypothesis: Some Theory and New Evidence.
“红鲱鱼”假说:一些理论与新证据。
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jan 21;10(2):211. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10020211.
4
Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review.癌症治疗和结局的支付意愿:系统综述。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Aug;23(6):1037-1057. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01407-9. Epub 2021 Dec 2.
5
Using discrete choice model to elicit preference for health-care priority setting.运用离散选择模型来确定医疗保健资源分配的优先顺序偏好。
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Jun 27;8:117. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_404_18. eCollection 2019.