• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期癌症患者及其照顾者对临终关怀的偏好比较:一项离散选择实验。

Comparison of preferences for end-of-life care among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: A discrete choice experiment.

作者信息

Malhotra Chetna, Farooqui Muhammad Assad, Kanesvaran Ravindran, Bilger Marcel, Finkelstein Eric

机构信息

Lien Centre for Palliative Care, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, Singapore

Program in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2015 Oct;29(9):842-50. doi: 10.1177/0269216315578803. Epub 2015 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1177/0269216315578803
PMID:25805740
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced cancer often have to make difficult decisions, such as how much to spend on moderately life-extending treatments. This and other end-of-life decisions are also influenced by their informal caregivers. Understanding the relative value that patients and their caregivers place on various aspects of end-of-life care can help clinicians tailor treatments to best meet the preferences of their patients.

AIM

To quantify willingness to pay of patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers to extend the patients' life by 1 year and to compare this result to their willingness to pay for other end-of-life improvements.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional survey using a discrete choice experiment.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 211 patients with stage IV cancer and their informal caregivers.

RESULTS

The willingness to pay of patients to extend their life by 1 year (S$18,570; 95% confidence interval: S$6687-S$30,542) was not statistically different from their willingness to pay to avoid severe pain (S$22,199; S$11,648-S$32,450), to die at home (S$31,256; S$21,249-S$41,391), not be a burden on family and friends (S$4051; -S$3543 to S$11,568), or to receive a high-quality health-care experience (S$16,191; S$9266-S$23,037). Consistent with our hypothesis, caregivers had a greater willingness to pay than patients to extend life (S$61,368; S$37,030-S$86,210) and for most other end-of-life improvements.

CONCLUSION

Results highlight the importance of pain management, supporting home deaths, and addressing other end-of-life concerns, in addition to efforts to extend life. Differences in willingness to pay of patients and caregivers suggest the need for eliciting patient preferences during treatment decision making as opposed to relying on caregiver input.

摘要

背景

晚期癌症患者常常需要做出艰难的决定,比如在适度延长生命的治疗上花费多少。这类临终决定以及其他临终决定也会受到其非正式照护者的影响。了解患者及其照护者对临终关怀各个方面的相对重视程度,有助于临床医生调整治疗方案,以最好地满足患者的偏好。

目的

量化晚期癌症患者及其照护者为将患者生命延长1年的支付意愿,并将这一结果与他们为其他临终改善措施的支付意愿进行比较。

设计

采用离散选择实验的横断面调查。

参与者

总共211名IV期癌症患者及其非正式照护者。

结果

患者将生命延长1年的支付意愿(18,570新元;95%置信区间:6687新元至30,542新元)与他们为避免剧痛的支付意愿(22,199新元;11,648新元至32,450新元)、在家中离世的支付意愿(31,256新元;21,249新元至41,391新元)、不给家人和朋友带来负担的支付意愿(4051新元;-3543新元至11,568新元)或获得高质量医疗体验的支付意愿(16,191新元;9266新元至23,037新元)在统计学上无差异。与我们的假设一致,照护者比患者有更高的支付意愿来延长生命(61,368新元;37,030新元至86,210新元)以及用于大多数其他临终改善措施。

结论

结果凸显了疼痛管理、支持在家中离世以及解决其他临终问题的重要性,此外还有延长生命的努力。患者和照护者支付意愿的差异表明,在治疗决策过程中需要征求患者的偏好,而不是依赖照护者的意见。

相似文献

1
Comparison of preferences for end-of-life care among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers: A discrete choice experiment.晚期癌症患者及其照顾者对临终关怀的偏好比较:一项离散选择实验。
Palliat Med. 2015 Oct;29(9):842-50. doi: 10.1177/0269216315578803. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
2
Preferences for end-of-life care among community-dwelling older adults and patients with advanced cancer: A discrete choice experiment.社区居住的老年人和晚期癌症患者对临终关怀的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Health Policy. 2015 Nov;119(11):1482-9. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
3
Preferences for Postacute Care at Home vs Facilities.患者对居家和机构康复治疗的偏好。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Apr 5;5(4):e240678. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.0678.
4
Providing Informal Care in Terminal Illness: An Analysis of Preferences for Support Using a Discrete Choice Experiment.为绝症患者提供非正式护理:基于离散选择实验的支持偏好分析
Med Decis Making. 2014 Aug;34(6):731-45. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13500719. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
5
Impact of Treatment Subsidies and Cash Payouts on Treatment Choices at the End of Life.治疗补贴和现金支付对临终治疗选择的影响。
Value Health. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(6):788-794. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.015.
6
Discordance among patient preferences, caregiver preferences, and caregiver predictions of patient preferences regarding disclosure of terminal status and end-of-life choices.在患者偏好、照护者偏好以及照护者对患者关于终末期状况披露和临终选择偏好的预测之间存在不一致。
Psychooncology. 2015 Feb;24(2):212-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.3631. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
7
Assessing the value of symptom relief for patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment: willingness to pay using a discrete choice experiment.评估胃食管反流病治疗中症状缓解对患者的价值:使用离散选择实验进行意愿支付。
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):588-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.007. Epub 2013 May 3.
8
Preferences for End-of-Life Care Among Patients With Terminal Cancer in China.中国晚期癌症患者对临终关怀的偏好。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e228788. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8788.
9
The economic value of informal care: a study of informal caregivers' and patients' willingness to pay and willingness to accept for informal care.非正式照护的经济价值:一项关于非正式照护者及患者对非正式照护的支付意愿和接受意愿的研究。
Health Econ. 2005 Apr;14(4):363-76. doi: 10.1002/hec.980.
10
Factors Associated with Patient-Caregiver Concordance about Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences among Advanced Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.与晚期癌症患者的生命维持治疗偏好的医患一致性相关的因素:一项横断面研究。
Semin Oncol Nurs. 2024 Oct;40(5):151697. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151697. Epub 2024 Aug 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Population Preferences for Treatment in Life-Limiting Illness: Valuing the Way Time Is Spent at the End of Life.终末期疾病患者对治疗的偏好:珍视生命末期的时光利用方式
Med Decis Making. 2025 Oct;45(7):849-861. doi: 10.1177/0272989X251346203. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
2
Using discrete choice experiments to elicit palliative care preferences in lower middle-income countries: An exploratory study in Bhutan.运用离散选择实验来引出中低收入国家的姑息治疗偏好:不丹的一项探索性研究。
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Apr 25;19:26323524251334183. doi: 10.1177/26323524251334183. eCollection 2025.
3
Breaking with the status quo in end-of-life care through de-implementation.
通过去实施来打破临终关怀的现状。
J Intern Med. 2025 Aug;298(2):97-106. doi: 10.1111/joim.20086. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
4
Prediction of COVID-19 patients' participation in financing informal care using machine learning methods: willingness to pay and willingness to accept approaches.使用机器学习方法预测 COVID-19 患者参与非正式护理的意愿:支付意愿和接受意愿方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 10;24(1):796. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11250-2.
5
How do Patients With Advanced Cancer and Family Caregivers Accommodate One Another in Decision-Making? Findings From a Qualitative Study in Specialist Palliative Care.晚期癌症患者及其家庭照顾者在决策过程中如何相互适应?一项专科姑息治疗定性研究的结果
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2025 May;42(5):452-458. doi: 10.1177/10499091241255117. Epub 2024 May 16.
6
Goals of Care Among Patients With Advanced Cancer and Their Family Caregivers in the Last Years of Life.晚期癌症患者及其家庭照护者在生命最后几年的关怀目标。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 1;7(4):e245866. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5866.
7
Intervention and coping strategies for self-perceived burden of patients with cancer: A systematic review.癌症患者自我感知负担的干预与应对策略:一项系统综述
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Apr 11;10(6):100231. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100231. eCollection 2023 Jun.
8
Trajectories of Health-related quality of life in patients with Advanced Cancer during the Last Year of Life: findings from the COMPASS study.晚期癌症患者生命终末期一年的健康相关生活质量轨迹:来自 COMPASS 研究的结果。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Oct 14;21(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01075-3.
9
Preferences for private health insurance in China: A discrete choice experiment.中国人对私人健康保险的偏好:一项离散选择实验。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 6;10:985582. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.985582. eCollection 2022.
10
Preferences for End-of-Life Care Among Patients With Terminal Cancer in China.中国晚期癌症患者对临终关怀的偏好。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e228788. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8788.