Frohlich Jennifer R, Alarcón Christina N, Toarmino Camille R, Sunseri Anna K, Hockman Tyler M
Animal Care Program, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California, Office of Laboratory Animal Care, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California;, Email:
Biomedical Sciences Program, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2018 Jul 1;57(4):382-391. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-17-000134. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
Many biomedical research protocols for mouse models involve serial blood collection and analysis. Two common techniques for serial blood collection in this species are the retrobulbar (RB, also called retroorbital) and facial vein (FV) methods. However, previous studies comparing these methods typically evaluated collection at a maximum of 2 time points. Here we compared hematologic values, adverse clinical effects, and histopathologic lesions in mice bled either once or serially (6 times) by using the FV or RB method. Mice (n = 48) were divided into 4 groups: single FV, single RB, serial FV and serial RB. Mice in the single-collection groups underwent a single blood collection by the indicated method, whereas those in the serial-collection groups were sampled once weekly for 6 consecutive weeks. All animals were euthanized and necropsied 2 wk after their last blood collection. Compared with all other groups, the serial FV group experienced more serious clinical adverse events, including 33% mortality, convulsions, head tilt, and hemorrhage from the ear canal and nares. In addition, mice in the FV groups had a significantly greater acute body weight loss compared with mice in the RB groups. Histologically, mice in both serial-collection groups had an increased incidence of tissue lesions compared with their respective single-collection groups. Importantly, only mice in the serial FV group had life-threatening histopathologic lesions, including cerebral hemorrhage or ischemia. Given these data, we conclude that serial blood collection in mice causes increased incidence of tissue damage compared with single sampling, and serial blood collection by the FV method causes substantial morbidity and mortality compared with the RB method.
许多针对小鼠模型的生物医学研究方案都涉及连续采血和分析。该物种连续采血的两种常用技术是球后(RB,也称为眶后)和面部静脉(FV)采血法。然而,以往比较这些方法的研究通常最多在2个时间点评估采血情况。在此,我们比较了通过FV或RB方法单次或连续(6次)采血的小鼠的血液学值、临床不良反应和组织病理学损伤。将48只小鼠分为4组:单次FV组、单次RB组、连续FV组和连续RB组。单次采血组的小鼠通过指定方法进行单次采血,而连续采血组的小鼠连续6周每周采血一次。所有动物在最后一次采血后2周实施安乐死并进行尸检。与所有其他组相比,连续FV组出现了更严重的临床不良事件,包括33%的死亡率、惊厥、头部倾斜以及耳道和鼻孔出血。此外,与RB组小鼠相比,FV组小鼠的急性体重减轻明显更多。在组织学上,与各自的单次采血组相比,两个连续采血组的小鼠组织损伤发生率均有所增加。重要的是,只有连续FV组的小鼠出现了危及生命的组织病理学损伤,包括脑出血或局部缺血。基于这些数据,我们得出结论,与单次采血相比,小鼠连续采血会导致组织损伤发生率增加,并且与RB方法相比,通过FV方法连续采血会导致大量发病和死亡。