Laboratory Animal Resources, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa;, Email:
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2022 May 1;61(3):287-295. doi: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-21-000129. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
Multiple methods are used to collect blood from mice; these methods have different effects on animal welfare. This study compared blood collection from facial, chin, and saphenous locations with regard to various parameters, including the time needed to collect blood, the number of attempts needed, success at completing the blood collection, volume of blood loss, weight changes in the mouse, presence of external lesions after blood collection and gross lesions at necropsy, physical signs during blood collection (vocalization, urination, and defecation), fecal corticosterone after blood collection, and blood chemistry values. While no one technique was clearly better for animal welfare, each technique had benefits and drawbacks.
有多种方法可用于从小鼠中采集血液;这些方法对动物福利有不同的影响。本研究比较了从面部、下巴和隐静脉采集血液在各种参数方面的差异,包括采集所需的时间、所需尝试的次数、采血完成的成功率、失血量、小鼠体重变化、采血后是否有外部损伤和尸检时的大体病变、采血过程中的身体迹象(发声、排尿和排便)、采血后粪便皮质酮水平以及血液化学值。虽然没有一种技术明显更有利于动物福利,但每种技术都有其优点和缺点。