Suppr超能文献

预防性吲哚美辛与死亡或支气管肺发育不良的关系:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Association between prophylactic indomethacin and death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

机构信息

Division of Neonatology and Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and The University of Pennsylvania.

Division of Neonatology and Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and The University of Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Semin Perinatol. 2018 Jun;42(4):228-234. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 10.

Abstract

The use of prophylactic indomethacin in very preterm infants is controversial. The last randomized controlled trial (RCT) to study this therapy enrolled infants over 20 years ago. More recently, observational studies have investigated the association between exposure to prophylactic indomethacin and neonatal morbidities and mortality. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of these studies for the outcomes of death and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Two observational studies involving a total of 11,289 very preterm infants were suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled data showed that prophylactic indomethacin was not associated with higher or lower risk-adjusted odds of death or BPD (0.93, 95% CI: 0.76-1.13) and of BPD among survivors (0.94, 95% CI: 0.78-1.12). However, there was a weak association between indomethacin prophylaxis and decreased risk-adjusted odds of mortality (0.81, 95% CI: 0.66-0.98). It is unknown whether this finding resulted from unmeasured confounding, chance, or represents a true benefit. To confirm the hypothesis that prophylactic indomethacin has a small effect on mortality in the current era, a contemporary RCT would need to enroll over 3500 very immature infants at high risk of death.

摘要

预防性使用吲哚美辛在极早产儿中存在争议。最后一项对此疗法进行研究的随机对照试验(RCT)是在 20 多年前进行的。最近,观察性研究调查了预防性使用吲哚美辛与新生儿发病率和死亡率之间的关系。我们对这些研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估死亡和支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的结局。有两项观察性研究共纳入了 11289 名极早产儿,适合进行荟萃分析。汇总数据显示,预防性使用吲哚美辛与死亡或 BPD 的风险调整比值比(0.93,95%CI:0.76-1.13)以及幸存者中 BPD 的风险调整比值比(0.94,95%CI:0.78-1.12)无关。然而,吲哚美辛预防与死亡风险调整比值比降低(0.81,95%CI:0.66-0.98)之间存在微弱关联。尚不清楚这一发现是由于未测量的混杂因素、偶然因素还是代表真正的获益。要证实预防性使用吲哚美辛在当前时代对死亡率有微小影响的假设,需要在有死亡高风险的非常不成熟的早产儿中招募超过 3500 名婴儿进行当代 RCT。

相似文献

9
Therapeutic closure of the ductus arteriosus: benefits and limitations.动脉导管的治疗性闭合:益处与局限性
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;22 Suppl 3:14-20. doi: 10.1080/14767050903198132.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Prophylactic Indomethacin Revisited.预防性使用吲哚美辛的再探讨。
J Pediatr. 2017 Jul;186:11-14.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.03.036. Epub 2017 Apr 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验