Division of Neonatology and Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and The University of Pennsylvania.
Division of Neonatology and Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and The University of Pennsylvania.
Semin Perinatol. 2018 Jun;42(4):228-234. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 10.
The use of prophylactic indomethacin in very preterm infants is controversial. The last randomized controlled trial (RCT) to study this therapy enrolled infants over 20 years ago. More recently, observational studies have investigated the association between exposure to prophylactic indomethacin and neonatal morbidities and mortality. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of these studies for the outcomes of death and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Two observational studies involving a total of 11,289 very preterm infants were suitable for meta-analysis. The pooled data showed that prophylactic indomethacin was not associated with higher or lower risk-adjusted odds of death or BPD (0.93, 95% CI: 0.76-1.13) and of BPD among survivors (0.94, 95% CI: 0.78-1.12). However, there was a weak association between indomethacin prophylaxis and decreased risk-adjusted odds of mortality (0.81, 95% CI: 0.66-0.98). It is unknown whether this finding resulted from unmeasured confounding, chance, or represents a true benefit. To confirm the hypothesis that prophylactic indomethacin has a small effect on mortality in the current era, a contemporary RCT would need to enroll over 3500 very immature infants at high risk of death.
预防性使用吲哚美辛在极早产儿中存在争议。最后一项对此疗法进行研究的随机对照试验(RCT)是在 20 多年前进行的。最近,观察性研究调查了预防性使用吲哚美辛与新生儿发病率和死亡率之间的关系。我们对这些研究进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估死亡和支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的结局。有两项观察性研究共纳入了 11289 名极早产儿,适合进行荟萃分析。汇总数据显示,预防性使用吲哚美辛与死亡或 BPD 的风险调整比值比(0.93,95%CI:0.76-1.13)以及幸存者中 BPD 的风险调整比值比(0.94,95%CI:0.78-1.12)无关。然而,吲哚美辛预防与死亡风险调整比值比降低(0.81,95%CI:0.66-0.98)之间存在微弱关联。尚不清楚这一发现是由于未测量的混杂因素、偶然因素还是代表真正的获益。要证实预防性使用吲哚美辛在当前时代对死亡率有微小影响的假设,需要在有死亡高风险的非常不成熟的早产儿中招募超过 3500 名婴儿进行当代 RCT。