Division of Cardiology, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Health Sciences, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Perinatol. 2014 Jan;31(1):61-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1334449. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
To compare the effects of prophylactic indomethacin versus expectant management on short-term respiratory outcomes in extremely low-birth-weight (ELBW) infants.
This was a retrospective cohort study of ELBW infants with gestational age less than 28 weeks, born at a level III neonatal intensive care unit from 2004 to 2009. Patients were grouped based on whether they received prophylactic indomethacin or expectant treatment. The key outcome was the cumulative number of days of mechanical ventilation. Other outcomes were cumulative number of days supplemental oxygen and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) were required; duration of hospital stay; mortality; and other morbidities such as necrotizing enterocolitis and intraventricular hemorrhage. Multivariable linear regression was performed with treatment group and seven covariates, defined a priori, as predictor variables and cumulative number of days of mechanical ventilation as the outcome.
There were 144 infants in the prophylaxis group and 221 infants in the expectant treatment group. At baseline, the Score for Neonatal Acute Physiology-Perinatal Extension, incidence of respiratory distress syndrome, and usage of antenatal corticosteroids were significantly higher in the prophylaxis group. The cumulative number of days of mechanical ventilation, supplemental oxygen, and CPAP were significantly higher in the prophylaxis group. On multivariable linear regression, after adjusting for confounders, use of prophylactic indomethacin (unstandardized β coefficient = 12.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.6, 18.1; p < 0.001), birth weight (β = -0.025; 95% CI: -0.05, -0.001; p = 0.043), and gestation (β = -4.5; 95% CI: -7.24, -1.8; p = 0.001) were the independent predictors of cumulative number of days of mechanical ventilation.
ELBW infants who received prophylactic indomethacin had significantly longer cumulative number of days of mechanical ventilation, supplemental oxygen, and CPAP. Prophylactic indomethacin is an independent predictor of cumulative number of days of mechanical ventilation.
比较预防性使用吲哚美辛与期待治疗对极低出生体重(ELBW)儿短期呼吸结局的影响。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入 2004 年至 2009 年在三级新生儿重症监护病房出生、胎龄<28 周的 ELBW 婴儿。根据是否接受预防性吲哚美辛或期待治疗将患者分为两组。主要结局为机械通气累计天数。其他结局包括需要补充氧气和持续气道正压通气(CPAP)的累计天数、住院时间、死亡率以及其他并发症如坏死性小肠结肠炎和颅内出血。采用多变量线性回归,以治疗组和 7 个预先定义的协变量(作为预测变量)和机械通气累计天数为结局。
预防组有 144 例婴儿,期待治疗组有 221 例婴儿。基线时,预防组新生儿急性生理学-围产期延伸评分、呼吸窘迫综合征发生率和产前皮质激素使用率显著更高。预防组机械通气、补充氧气和 CPAP 的累计天数明显更高。多变量线性回归调整混杂因素后,预防性使用吲哚美辛(未标准化β系数=12.4;95%置信区间:6.6,18.1;p<0.001)、出生体重(β=-0.025;95%置信区间:-0.05,-0.001;p=0.043)和胎龄(β=-4.5;95%置信区间:-7.24,-1.8;p=0.001)是机械通气累计天数的独立预测因素。
接受预防性吲哚美辛治疗的 ELBW 儿机械通气累计天数、补充氧气和 CPAP 时间明显更长。预防性吲哚美辛是机械通气累计天数的独立预测因素。