Suppr超能文献

NRG Oncology 医学物理学家人力调查,量化多机构临床试验的支持需求。

NRG Oncology medical physicists' manpower survey quantifying support demands for multi-institutional clinical trials.

机构信息

Radiation Oncology, St. Anthony's Cancer Center, St. Louis, Missouri; Radiation Oncology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

NRG Oncology Operations Department, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 Sep-Oct;8(5):324-331. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Feb 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A survey was created by NRG to assess a medical physicists' percent full time equivalent (FTE) contribution to multi-institutional clinical trials. A 2012 American Society for Radiation Oncology report, "Safety Is No Accident," quantified medical physics staffing contributions in FTE factors for clinical departments. No quantification of FTE effort associated with clinical trials was included.

METHODS

To address this lack of information, the NRG Medical Physics Subcommittee decided to obtain manpower data from the medical physics community to quantify the amount of time medical physicists spent supporting clinical trials. A survey, consisting of 16 questions, was designed to obtain information regarding physicists' time spent supporting clinical trials. The survey was distributed to medical physicists at 1996 radiation therapy institutions included on the membership rosters of the 5 National Clinical Trials Network clinical trial groups.

RESULTS

Of the 451 institutions who responded, 50% (226) reported currently participating in radiation therapy trials. On average, the designated physicist at each institution spent 2.4 hours (standard deviation [SD], 5.5) per week supervising or interacting with clinical trial staff. On average, 1.2 hours (SD, 3.1), 1.8 hours (SD, 3.9), and 0.6 hours (SD, 1.1) per week were spent on trial patient simulations, treatment plan reviews, and maintaining a Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine server, respectively. For all trial credentialing activities, physicists spent an average of 32 hours (SD, 57.2) yearly. Reading protocols and supporting dosimetrists, clinicians, and therapists took an average of 2.1 hours (SD, 3.4) per week. Physicists also attended clinical trial meetings, on average, 1.2 hours (SD, 1.9) per month.

CONCLUSION

On average, physicist spent a nontrivial total of 9 hours per week (0.21 FTE) supporting an average of 10 active clinical trials. This time commitment indicates the complexity of radiation therapy clinical trials and should be taken into account when staffing radiation therapy institutions.

摘要

目的

NRG 进行了一项调查,以评估医学物理学家对多机构临床试验的全职等效(FTE)贡献。2012 年,美国放射肿瘤学会发表了一份报告,题为“安全绝非偶然”,量化了临床科室中医疗物理师人员配备的 FTE 因素。该报告未包括与临床试验相关的 FTE 工作的量化。

方法

为了解决这方面的信息缺失,NRG 医学物理小组委员会决定从医学物理界获取人力数据,以量化医学物理学家在支持临床试验方面所花费的时间。设计了一项包含 16 个问题的调查,以获取有关物理学家支持临床试验时间的信息。该调查分发给了 1996 个放射治疗机构的医学物理学家,这些机构的成员名单都在 5 个国家临床试验网络临床试验组中。

结果

在 451 个做出回应的机构中,有 50%(226 个)报告目前正在参与放射治疗试验。平均而言,每个机构的指定物理学家每周花费 2.4 小时(标准差[SD],5.5)监督或与临床试验工作人员互动。平均而言,每周分别花费 1.2 小时(SD,3.1)、1.8 小时(SD,3.9)和 0.6 小时(SD,1.1)用于试验患者模拟、治疗计划审查和维护数字成像和通信的医学服务器。对于所有试验认证活动,物理学家每年平均花费 32 小时(SD,57.2)。阅读方案并为剂量师、临床医生和治疗师提供支持平均每周花费 2.1 小时(SD,3.4)。物理学家还平均每月参加临床试验会议 1.2 小时(SD,1.9)。

结论

平均而言,物理学家每周花费 9 小时(0.21 FTE)来支持平均 10 个活跃的临床试验。这项时间投入表明了放射治疗临床试验的复杂性,在为放射治疗机构配备人员时应考虑到这一点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/94e4/6346429/bf71f6e01706/nihms-1508431-f0001.jpg

相似文献

2
Diagnostic medical physicists and their clinical activities.诊断医学物理师及其临床活动。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Feb;1(2):120-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2003.11.006.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验