Suppr超能文献

新辅助质子束照射与辅助钌近距离放射治疗在葡萄膜黑色素瘤经巩膜切除术中的比较

Neoadjuvant proton beam irradiation vs. adjuvant ruthenium brachytherapy in transscleral resection of uveal melanoma.

作者信息

Böker Alexander, Pilger Daniel, Cordini Dino, Seibel Ira, Riechardt Aline I, Joussen Antonia M, Bechrakis Nikolaos E

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Campus Benjamin Franklin and Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Germany.

Lise-Meitner-Campus, Berlinprotonen at the Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep;256(9):1767-1775. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4032-7. Epub 2018 Jun 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary ocular malignancy in adults in the USA and Europe. The optimal treatment of large uveal melanoma is still under debate. Radiation therapy has its limitation due its eye-threatening secondary complications and is therefore often combined with surgical excision of the tumor.

METHODS

In a retrospective interventional review, we evaluated in total 242 patients with uveal melanoma that underwent transscleral tumor resection with a predefined protocol, either with adjuvant ruthenium brachytherapy (Ru-106 group, n 136,), or with neoadjuvant proton beam therapy (PBT group, n 106). Kaplan-Meier estimates with log-rank test were used to show survival curves and a multivariable Cox regression model was used to calculate adjusted rate ratios.

RESULTS

Local tumor recurrence rates after 3 and 5 years were 4% (95% CI 1.2-17.8%) and 9.1% (95% CI 2.9-27.3%), respectively, in the PBT group and 24.6% (95% CI 15.8-37.1%) and 27.5 (95% CI 17.8-41.1%), respectively, in the Ru-106 group. This leads to an overall recurrence rate almost 4 times higher in the Ru-106 group compared to the PBT group. After adjusting for the a priori confounders and the tumor distance to optic disc and ciliary body infiltration, the adjusted risk of tumor recurrence was 8 times (RR 7.69 (2.22-26.06), p < 0.001) higher in the Ru-106 group as compared to the PBT group. Three- and 5-year metastatic rates were 23.2% (95% CI 5.6-37.1%) and 31.8% (95% CI 20.7-46.8%), respectively, in the PBT group and 13.2% (95% CI 6.8-24.9%) and 30.3% (95% CI 18.3-47.5%), respectively, in the Ru-106 group. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall metastasis rate between the two groups even after adjusting for possible confounders.

CONCLUSION

Transscleral resection of large uveal melanomas combined with neoadjuvant proton beam therapy leads to a lower local tumor recurrence rate compared to transscleral tumor resection with adjuvant ruthenium brachytherapy. There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of rubeosis iridis, neovascular glaucoma, and in the need for enucleation later on.

摘要

背景

葡萄膜黑色素瘤是美国和欧洲成年人中最常见的原发性眼部恶性肿瘤。大型葡萄膜黑色素瘤的最佳治疗方法仍存在争议。放射治疗因其具有威胁眼睛的继发性并发症而存在局限性,因此常与肿瘤手术切除相结合。

方法

在一项回顾性干预性研究中,我们总共评估了242例接受经巩膜肿瘤切除术的葡萄膜黑色素瘤患者,这些患者按照预先定义的方案进行治疗,要么接受辅助钌近距离放射治疗(钌 - 106组,n = 136),要么接受新辅助质子束治疗(PBT组,n = 106)。采用Kaplan - Meier估计值和对数秩检验来显示生存曲线,并使用多变量Cox回归模型计算调整后的率比。

结果

PBT组3年和5年的局部肿瘤复发率分别为4%(95%可信区间1.2 - 17.8%)和9.1%(95%可信区间2.9 - 27.3%),钌 - 106组分别为24.6%(95%可信区间15.8 - 37.1%)和27.5%(95%可信区间17.8 - 41.1%)。这导致钌 - 106组的总体复发率比PBT组高出近4倍。在对先验混杂因素以及肿瘤与视盘的距离和睫状体浸润进行调整后,钌 - 106组的肿瘤复发调整风险比PBT组高8倍(风险比7.69(2.22 - 26.06),p < 0.001)。PBT组3年和5年的转移率分别为23.2%(95%可信区间5.6 - 37.1%)和31.8%(95%可信区间20.7 - 46.8%),钌 - 106组分别为13.2%(95%可信区间6.8 - 24.9%)和30.3%(95%可信区间18.3 - 47.5%)。即使在对可能的混杂因素进行调整后,两组之间的总体转移率也没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

与辅助钌近距离放射治疗的经巩膜肿瘤切除术相比,大型葡萄膜黑色素瘤的经巩膜切除术联合新辅助质子束治疗可导致更低的局部肿瘤复发率。在虹膜红变、新生血管性青光眼的发生以及后期眼球摘除的需求方面,没有统计学上的显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验