• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放式与法式开门式椎板成形术治疗颈椎多节段压迫性脊髓病的Meta分析

Open-versus French-Door Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Multilevel Compressive Myelopathy: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Luo Wenqi, Li Yueying, Zhao Jianhui, Gu Rui, Jiang Rui, Lin Feng

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.

Department of Hand Surgery, China-Japan Union Hospital, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2018 Sep;117:129-136. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.026. Epub 2018 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.026
PMID:29908382
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes and postoperative complications between open-door laminoplasty (ODL) versus French-door laminoplasty (FDL) for the treatment of cervical multilevel compressive myelopathy.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure to identify relevant articles. The search results were last updated on January 1, 2018. All values of weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio are expressed as ODL relative to FDL.

RESULTS

Six studies containing 430 patients were included in our meta-analysis. In randomized controlled trials, there was no significant difference in Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores between ODL and FDL groups (WMD, 0.06; 95% confidence limits [CL], -0.52 to 0.64; P = 0.84). However, in the retrospective trials, JOA scores were significantly higher in the ODL group than in the FDL group (WMD, 0.95; 95% CL, 0.55-1.34; P < 0.05). The pooled data showed that the magnitude of spinal canal expansion in the ODL group was higher than in the FDL group (WMD, 24.39%; 95% confidence interval, 12.33-36.45; P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis showed that the magnitude of canal expansion was higher with ODL than with FDL. There is a lack of compelling evidence to prove the superiority of one procedure over the other.

摘要

目的

比较开门式椎板成形术(ODL)与法式开门式椎板成形术(FDL)治疗颈椎多节段压迫性脊髓病的临床疗效和术后并发症。

方法

我们全面检索了PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆和中国知网,以确定相关文章。检索结果于2018年1月1日更新。所有加权平均差(WMD)和比值比的值均表示为ODL相对于FDL。

结果

我们的荟萃分析纳入了6项研究,共430例患者。在随机对照试验中,ODL组和FDL组之间的日本矫形外科学会(JOA)评分无显著差异(WMD,0.06;95%置信区间[CL],-0.52至0.64;P = 0.84)。然而,在回顾性试验中,ODL组的JOA评分显著高于FDL组(WMD,0.95;95% CL,0.55 - 1.34;P < 0.05)。汇总数据显示,ODL组的椎管扩大幅度高于FDL组(WMD,24.39%;95%置信区间,12.33 - 36.45;P < 0.05)。

结论

目前的荟萃分析表明,ODL的椎管扩大幅度高于FDL。缺乏令人信服的证据证明一种手术优于另一种手术。

相似文献

1
Open-versus French-Door Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Multilevel Compressive Myelopathy: A Meta-Analysis.开放式与法式开门式椎板成形术治疗颈椎多节段压迫性脊髓病的Meta分析
World Neurosurg. 2018 Sep;117:129-136. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.026. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
2
Comparative Effectiveness and Functional Outcome of Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy: A Meta-Analysis.开门式与法式开门式椎板成形术治疗多节段颈椎病的比较疗效及功能结局:一项Meta分析
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 Oct 13;7(19):3348-3352. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.739. eCollection 2019 Oct 15.
3
Open-door versus French-door laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical multilevel compressive myelopathy.开门式与法式开门式椎板成形术治疗颈椎多节段压迫性脊髓病
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Mar;22(3):450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.08.022. Epub 2014 Dec 15.
4
Comparative Five-Year Surgical Outcomes of Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty in Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.多节段脊髓型颈椎病经单开门与双开门椎管扩大成形术的 5 年手术疗效比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Dec 7;2020:8853733. doi: 10.1155/2020/8853733. eCollection 2020.
5
Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty for Patients with Multisegmental Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.开门式与法式开门式颈椎管狭窄症多节段脊髓病减压术的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Nov;155:82-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.032. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
6
Comparative effectiveness of open-door laminoplasty versus French-door laminoplasty in cervical compressive myelopathy.开门式椎板成形术与法式开门椎板成形术治疗颈椎压迫性脊髓病的疗效比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 15;39(8):642-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000252.
7
A prospective randomized study of clinical outcomes in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy treated with open-door or French-door laminoplasty.一项关于采用开门或法式开门椎板成形术治疗颈椎压迫性脊髓病患者临床结局的前瞻性随机研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 May 15;34(11):1119-26. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31819c3b61.
8
Skip Laminectomy Compared with Laminoplasty for Cervical Compressive Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.与椎板成形术相比,颈椎管狭窄症行椎板切除术的疗效:一项系统评价与Meta分析
World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.08.231. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
9
Comparison of surgical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty: open-door technique versus French-door technique.颈椎椎板成形术后手术效果比较:开门技术与法式开门技术
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Aug;26(6):E198-203. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e31828bb296.
10
Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel cervical myelopathy: A meta-analysis.前路椎体切除术与后路椎板成形术治疗多节段颈脊髓病的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Nov;35:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.09.008. Epub 2016 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Opening Side of Unilateral Open-Door Laminoplasty Does Not Impact Improvement in Arm Pain or Space Available for the Spinal Cord.单侧开门式椎板成形术的开门侧对臂部疼痛的改善或脊髓可用空间没有影响。
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 6;13(11):3345. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113345.
2
Hidden blood loss in unilateral open-door cervical laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.单侧开门颈椎板切除术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的隐性失血。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2024 Apr 26;35(2):293-298. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2024.1439.
3
The Essence of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy, 2020.
《脊髓型颈椎病临床实践指南(2020年版)》精髓
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2023 Feb 14;8(2):119-132. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2022-0229. eCollection 2024 Mar 27.
4
Comparison of Midline Splitting versus Unilateral Open Door Laminoplasty and Its Impact on Patient Outcomes.比较中线劈开术与单侧开门椎管成形术及其对患者预后的影响。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Jun;15(3):444-453. doi: 10.4055/cios22387. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
5
Risk factors for C palsy following the posterior spinal process-splitting laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a case control study.后纵韧带骨化症后路棘突劈开椎板成形术后C型麻痹的危险因素:一项病例对照研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Jun;10(11):634. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-1730.
6
Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Open-Door Laminoplasty, French-Door Laminoplasty, Laminectomy and Fusion, and Laminectomy Alone for Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Bayesian Network Analysis.多节段退变性颈椎病行单开门椎管扩大成形术、双开门椎管扩大成形术、椎板切除术融合术和单纯椎板切除术的疗效和安全性的比较:贝叶斯网络分析。
Adv Ther. 2022 Jan;39(1):117-139. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01980-8. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
7
Influence of SCA on clinical outcomes and cervical alignment after laminoplasty in patients with multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.多节段脊髓型颈椎病患者后纵韧带骨化症对颈椎管扩大术后临床疗效及颈椎曲度的影响。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02200-3.
8
Comparative Five-Year Surgical Outcomes of Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty in Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.多节段脊髓型颈椎病经单开门与双开门椎管扩大成形术的 5 年手术疗效比较。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Dec 7;2020:8853733. doi: 10.1155/2020/8853733. eCollection 2020.