Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Addict Behav. 2018 Oct;85:139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 May 24.
The opioid drug epidemic is a major public health concern and an economic burden in the United States. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the reliability and validity of screening instruments used in emergency medicine settings to detect opioid use in patients and to assess psychometric data for each screening instrument.
PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for articles published up to May 2018. The extracted articles were independently screened for eligibility by two reviewers. We extracted 1555 articles for initial screening and 95 articles were assessed for full-text eligibility. Six articles were extracted from the full-text assessment.
Six instruments were identified from the final article list: Screener and Opioid Assessment for Patients with Pain - Revised; Drug Abuse Screening Test; Opioid Risk Tool; Current Opioid Misuse Measure; an Emergency Medicine Providers Clinician Assessment Questionnaire; and an Emergency Provider Impression Data Collection Form. Screening instrument characteristics, and reliability and validity data were extracted from the six studies. A meta-analysis was not conducted due to heterogeneity between the studies.
There is a lack of validity and reliability evidence in all six articles; and sensitivity, specificity and predictive values varied between the different instruments. These instruments cannot be validated for use in emergency medicine settings. There is no clear evidence to state which screening instruments are appropriate for use in detecting opioid use disorders in emergency medicine patients. There is a need for brief, reliable, valid and feasible opioid use screening instruments in the emergency medicine setting.
阿片类药物滥用是美国面临的一个主要公共卫生问题和经济负担。本系统评价的目的是评估在急诊环境中用于检测患者阿片类药物使用的筛选工具的可靠性和有效性,并评估每个筛选工具的心理计量学数据。
检索了截至 2018 年 5 月发表的文章,包括 PubMed/MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Cochrane 系统评价数据库、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库、Web of Science、护理学和联合健康文献累积索引以及 ClinicalTrials.gov。由两名评审员独立筛选提取的文章以确定其是否符合入选标准。我们对 1555 篇文章进行了初步筛选,对 95 篇文章进行了全文入选评估。从全文评估中提取了 6 篇文章。
从最终的文章列表中确定了 6 种工具:修订后的疼痛患者筛选器和阿片类药物评估工具、药物滥用筛查测试、阿片类药物风险工具、当前阿片类药物滥用测量工具、急诊医师临床评估问卷和急诊提供者印象数据收集表。从 6 项研究中提取了筛选工具特征以及可靠性和有效性数据。由于研究之间存在异质性,因此未进行荟萃分析。
在所有 6 篇文章中都缺乏有效性和可靠性证据;并且不同工具之间的敏感性、特异性和预测值各不相同。这些工具不能在急诊环境中进行验证。没有明确的证据表明哪种筛选工具适合用于检测急诊医学患者中的阿片类药物使用障碍。需要在急诊医学环境中使用简洁、可靠、有效且可行的阿片类药物使用筛选工具。