Resurrección Davinia Maria, Moreno-Peral Patricia, Gómez-Herranz Marta, Rubio-Valera Maria, Pastor Luis, Caldas de Almeida Jose Miguel, Motrico Emma
1 Departamento de Psicología, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Spain.
2 SAMSERAP Group, Primary Care Prevention and Health Promotion Research Network (RedIAPP), Spain.
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2019 Jan;18(1):38-47. doi: 10.1177/1474515118783157. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
Although evidence exists for the efficacy of cardiac rehabilitation programmes to reduce morbidity and mortality among patients with cardiovascular disease, cardiac rehabilitation programmes are underused. We aimed systematically to review the evidence from prospective cohort studies on factors associated with non-participation in and/or dropping out from cardiac rehabilitation programmes.
MedLine, Embase, Scopus, Open Grey and Cochrane Database were searched for relevant publications from inception to February 2018. Search terms included (a) coronary heart disease and other cardiac conditions; (b) cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention; and (c) non-participation in and/or dropout. Databases were searched following the PRISMA statement. Study selection, data extraction and the assessment of study quality were performed in duplicate.
We selected 43 studies with a total of 63,425 patients from 10 different countries that met the inclusion criteria. Factors associated with non-participation in and dropout from cardiac rehabilitation were grouped into six broad categories: intrapersonal factors, clinical factors, interpersonal factors, logistical factors, cardiac rehabilitation programme factors and health system factors. We found that clinical factors, logistical factors and health system factors were the main factors assessed for non-participation in cardiac rehabilitation. We also found differences between the factors associated with non-participation and dropout.
Several factors were determinant for non-participation in and dropout from cardiac rehabilitation. These findings could be useful to clinicians and policymakers for developing interventions aimed at improving participation and completion of cardiac rehabilitation, such as E-health or home-based delivery programmes. Trial Registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) identifier: CRD42016032973.
尽管有证据表明心脏康复计划在降低心血管疾病患者的发病率和死亡率方面具有疗效,但心脏康复计划的使用率仍然很低。我们旨在系统地回顾前瞻性队列研究中有关不参与和/或退出心脏康复计划的相关因素的证据。
检索了MedLine、Embase、Scopus、Open Grey和Cochrane数据库,以查找从数据库建立至2018年2月的相关出版物。检索词包括:(a)冠心病和其他心脏疾病;(b)心脏康复和二级预防;以及(c)不参与和/或退出。按照PRISMA声明对数据库进行检索。研究选择、数据提取和研究质量评估均重复进行。
我们从10个不同国家选取了43项研究,共计63425名患者,这些研究符合纳入标准。与不参与和退出心脏康复相关的因素分为六大类:个人因素、临床因素、人际因素、后勤因素、心脏康复计划因素和卫生系统因素。我们发现,临床因素、后勤因素和卫生系统因素是评估不参与心脏康复的主要因素。我们还发现了与不参与和退出相关的因素之间的差异。
有几个因素是决定不参与和退出心脏康复的因素。这些发现可能对临床医生和政策制定者制定旨在提高心脏康复参与率和完成率的干预措施有用,如电子健康或居家服务计划。试验注册:国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)标识符:CRD42016032973。