• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于导航程序的结直肠癌筛查对减少社会健康不平等的成本效益分析:一项法国群组随机对照试验。

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Navigation Program for Colorectal Cancer Screening to Reduce Social Health Inequalities: A French Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

U1086 INSERM-UCN, ANTICIPE, Caen, France; University Hospital of Caen, France.

U1086 INSERM-UCN, ANTICIPE, Caen, France.

出版信息

Value Health. 2018 Jun;21(6):685-691. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.020. Epub 2017 Nov 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.020
PMID:29909873
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient navigation programs to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening adherence have become widespread in recent years, especially among deprived populations.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the first patient navigation program in France.

METHODS

A total of 16,250 participants were randomized to either the usual screening group (n = 8145) or the navigation group (n = 8105). Navigation consisted of personalized support provided by social workers. A cost-effectiveness analysis of navigation versus usual screening was conducted from the payer perspective in the Picardy region of northern France. We considered nonmedical direct costs in the analysis.

RESULTS

Navigation was associated with a significant increase of 3.3% (24.4% vs. 21.1%; P = 0.003) in participation. The increase in participation was higher among affluent participants (+4.1%; P = 0.01) than among deprived ones (+2.6%; P = 0.07). The cost per additional individual screened by navigation compared with usual screening (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio) was €1212 globally and €1527 among deprived participants. Results were sensitive to navigator wages and to the intervention effectiveness whose variations had the greatest impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient navigation aiming at increasing CRC screening participation is more efficient among affluent individuals. Nevertheless, when the intervention is implemented for the entire population, social inequalities in CRC screening adherence increase. To reduce social inequalities, patient navigation should therefore be restricted to deprived populations, despite not being the most cost-effective strategy, and accepted to bear a higher extra cost per additional individual screened.

摘要

背景

近年来,患者导航计划已广泛应用于提高结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的参与度,尤其是在贫困人群中。

目的

评估法国首个患者导航计划的成本效益。

方法

共有 16250 名参与者被随机分配到常规筛查组(n = 8145)或导航组(n = 8105)。导航由社会工作者提供的个性化支持组成。在法国北部皮卡第地区,从支付者的角度对导航与常规筛查进行了成本效益分析。我们在分析中考虑了非医疗直接成本。

结果

导航与参与率显著提高 3.3%(24.4%对 21.1%;P = 0.003)相关。在富裕参与者中(+4.1%;P = 0.01),导航对参与率的提升高于贫困参与者(+2.6%;P = 0.07)。与常规筛查相比,通过导航每额外筛查一个人的成本(增量成本效益比)为 1212 欧元,贫困参与者为 1527 欧元。结果对导航员工资和干预效果的变化敏感,这些变化对增量成本效益比的影响最大。

结论

旨在提高 CRC 筛查参与度的患者导航对富裕人群更有效。然而,当该干预措施应用于整个人群时,CRC 筛查参与的社会不平等程度会增加。为了减少社会不平等,患者导航应该仅限于贫困人群,尽管这不是最具成本效益的策略,但可以接受为每额外筛查一个人承担更高的额外成本。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Navigation Program for Colorectal Cancer Screening to Reduce Social Health Inequalities: A French Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.基于导航程序的结直肠癌筛查对减少社会健康不平等的成本效益分析:一项法国群组随机对照试验。
Value Health. 2018 Jun;21(6):685-691. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.09.020. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
2
Patient navigation to reduce social inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation: A cluster randomized controlled trial.患者导航以减少结直肠癌筛查参与中的社会不平等:一项集群随机对照试验。
Prev Med. 2017 Oct;103:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.012. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
3
Cost-effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care.标准干预与导航干预在初级保健中对结直肠癌筛查应用的成本效益比较。
Cancer. 2014 Apr 1;120(7):1042-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28535. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
4
ColoNav: patient navigation for colorectal cancer screening in deprived areas - Study protocol.ColoNav:贫困地区结直肠癌筛查的患者导航——研究方案
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jul 7;16:416. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2469-9.
5
Economic assessment of patient navigation to colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening in the real-world setting at the University of Chicago Medical Center.基于芝加哥大学医疗中心实际情况的结肠镜检查结直肠癌筛查中患者导航的经济评估。
Cancer. 2018 Nov 1;124(21):4137-4144. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31690. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
6
Cost-effectiveness of a patient navigation intervention to increase colonoscopy screening among low-income adults in New Hampshire.新罕布什尔州低收入成年人结肠镜筛查中患者导航干预的成本效益分析。
Cancer. 2019 Feb 15;125(4):601-609. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31864. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
7
Cost-effectiveness of patient navigation to increase adherence with screening colonoscopy among minority individuals.患者导航在提高少数族裔个体结肠镜筛查依从性方面的成本效益。
Cancer. 2015 Apr 1;121(7):1088-97. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29162. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
8
Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Interventions with Their Effects on Health Disparity Being Considered.考虑到对健康差异的影响的结直肠癌筛查干预措施的成本效益。
Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Jul;48(3):1010-9. doi: 10.4143/crt.2015.279. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
9
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Mobile Mammography Unit for Breast Cancer Screening to Reduce Geographic and Social Health Inequalities.移动乳腺摄影术用于乳腺癌筛查以减少地理和社会健康不平等的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2019 Oct;22(10):1111-1118. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
10
Cost-effectiveness analysis of a colonoscopy screening navigator program designed for Hispanic men.针对西班牙裔男性设计的结肠镜检查筛查导航项目的成本效益分析。
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Jun;30(2):260-7. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0718-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Components and effectiveness of patient navigation programmes to increase participation to breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review.患者导航计划的组成部分和效果,以提高乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查的参与度:系统评价。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(13):14584-14611. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6050. Epub 2023 May 28.
2
Interventions to reduce cancer screening inequities: the perspective and role of patients, advocacy groups, and empowerment organizations.减少癌症筛查不公平现象的干预措施:患者、倡导团体和赋权组织的观点和作用。
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jan 27;22(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12939-023-01841-6.
3
Evaluation of a mobile mammography unit: concepts and randomized cluster trial protocol of a population health intervention research to reduce breast cancer screening inequalities.
移动乳腺摄影设备评估:降低乳腺癌筛查不平等的人群健康干预研究的概念和随机群组试验方案。
Trials. 2022 Jul 8;23(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06480-w.
4
Implementation and Uptake of Rural Lung Cancer Screening.农村肺癌筛查的实施和采用。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2022 Mar;19(3):480-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.12.003. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
5
Effect of Text Messaging on Bowel Preparation and Appointment Attendance for Outpatient Colonoscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.短信对门诊结肠镜检查肠道准备及预约就诊的影响:一项随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2034553. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.34553.
6
The impact of interventions addressing socioeconomic inequalities in cancer-related outcomes in high-income countries: A systematic review.解决高收入国家癌症相关结果中社会经济不平等问题的干预措施的影响:一项系统综述。
J Public Health Res. 2020 Sep 14;9(3):1711. doi: 10.4081/jphr.2020.1711. eCollection 2020 Jul 28.
7
Nationwide cohort study of the impact of education, income and social isolation on survival after acute colorectal cancer surgery.全国性队列研究:教育、收入和社会隔离对急性结直肠癌手术后生存的影响。
BJS Open. 2020 Feb;4(1):133-144. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50218. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
8
Economics of Multicomponent Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Community Guide Systematic Review.多组分干预措施经济学以增加乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查:社区指南系统评价。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Oct;57(4):557-567. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Aug 30.