Magrum Eric D, Wagle John P, DeWeese Brad H, Sato Kimitake, Stone Michael H
Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA.
Department of Sport, Exercise, Recreation, and Kinesiology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN 37601, USA.
Sports (Basel). 2018 Feb 17;6(1):15. doi: 10.3390/sports6010015.
The purpose of this study was to compare ground contact time between an optical measurement system and a force platform. Participants in this study included six collegiate level athletes who performed drop jumps and sprint strike steps for a total of 15 repetitions each. Ground contact data was simultaneously collected from an optical measurement system and a force platform, at a sampling frequency of 1000 Hz. Data was then analyzed with Pearson's correlation and paired sample -tests. The measures from the optical measurement system were found to be significantly higher ( < 0.001) than measures from the force platform in both conditions. Although significantly different, the extremely large relationships (0.979, 0.993) found between the two devices suggest the optical sensor is able to detect similar changes in performance to that of a force platform. Practitioners may continue to utilize optical sensors to monitor performance as it may provide a superior user-friendly alternative to more traditional based monitoring procedures, but must comprehend the inherent limitations due to the design of the optical sensors.
本研究的目的是比较光学测量系统和测力平台之间的地面接触时间。本研究的参与者包括六名大学水平的运动员,他们进行了下落跳和冲刺打击步,每种动作各重复15次。地面接触数据由光学测量系统和测力平台同时采集,采样频率为1000Hz。然后用Pearson相关性分析和配对样本检验对数据进行分析。发现在两种情况下,光学测量系统的测量值均显著高于测力平台的测量值(<0.001)。尽管两者存在显著差异,但两种设备之间发现的极强相关性(0.979,0.993)表明,光学传感器能够检测到与测力平台类似的性能变化。从业者可能会继续使用光学传感器来监测性能,因为它可能为更传统的监测程序提供一种更优越的用户友好替代方案,但必须理解由于光学传感器的设计所固有的局限性。