University of Salford, United Kingdom.
University of Salford, United Kingdom.
Phys Ther Sport. 2016 Sep;21:20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2016.02.007. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
The purpose of this study was to compare the relationships between horizontal (HDJ) and vertical drop jumps (VDJ) to sprint performance.
Exploratory Study.
Laboratory.
Nineteen male collegiate participants (22.5 ± 3.2 years, 181.1 ± 6.7 cm, 80.3 ± 9.6 kg).
All participants performed VDJ and HDJ from a 20 cm height onto an AMTI force platform sampling at 1200 Hz before performing three 20 m sprints. Sprint times (5, 10, 15, 20, 5-10, 10-15, 15-20 m) were measured using a LAVEG speed gun.
All jump and sprint measures showed excellent within session reliability (ICC: 0.954 to 0.99). Pearson's and Spearman's correlations revealed significant (p < 0.01) moderate to high correlations between jump measures and sprint times (R: -0.665 to -0.769). Stepwise multiple regression revealed jump distance normalised by body height (HDJ) was the best predictor for 10, 20, 5-10, 10-15 and 15-20 m sprint times (R(2) = 41%-48%).
HDJ performance measures provide stronger relationships to sprint performance than VDJ's. Thus, HDJ's should be considered in test batteries to monitor training and rehabilitation for athletes in sprint related sports.
本研究旨在比较水平跳(HDJ)和垂直跳(VDJ)与短跑表现的关系。
探索性研究。
实验室。
19 名男性大学生参与者(22.5±3.2 岁,181.1±6.7cm,80.3±9.6kg)。
所有参与者均从 20cm 高处进行 VDJ 和 HDJ,然后在 AMTI 力台上以 1200Hz 采样,最后进行三次 20m 冲刺。使用 LAVEG 速度枪测量冲刺时间(5、10、15、20、5-10、10-15、15-20m)。
所有跳跃和冲刺测量均具有出色的组内可靠性(ICC:0.954 至 0.99)。Pearson 和 Spearman 相关性分析显示,跳跃测量值与冲刺时间之间存在显著(p<0.01)的中度至高度相关性(R:-0.665 至-0.769)。逐步多元回归显示,跳跃距离与身高的比值(HDJ)是 10、20、5-10、10-15 和 15-20m 冲刺时间的最佳预测指标(R²=41%-48%)。
HDJ 表现指标与短跑表现的关系比 VDJ 更强。因此,在与短跑相关的运动中,应考虑使用 HDJ 来监测运动员的训练和康复情况。