Suppr超能文献

少或许就是多:传导失败可能是限制重复经颅磁刺激治疗方案中更高频率疗效的一个因素。

Less Might Be More: Conduction Failure as a Factor Possibly Limiting the Efficacy of Higher Frequencies in rTMS Protocols.

作者信息

Halawa Islam, Goldental Amir, Shirota Yuichiro, Kanter Ido, Paulus Walter

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Department of Physics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2018 May 28;12:358. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00358. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

rTMS has been proven effective in the treatment of neuropsychiatric conditions, with class A (definite efficacy) evidence for treatment of depression and pain (Lefaucheur et al., 2014). The efficacy in stimulation protocols is, however, quite heterogeneous. Saturation of neuronal firing by HFrTMS without allowing time for recovery may lead to neuronal response failures (NRFs) that compromise the efficacy of stimulation with higher frequencies. To examine the efficacy of different rTMS temporal stimulation patterns focusing on a possible upper stimulation limit related to response failures. Protocol patterns were derived from published clinical studies on therapeutic rTMS for depression and pain. They were compared with conduction failures in cell cultures. From 57 papers using protocols rated class A for depression and pain (Lefaucheur et al., 2014) we extracted Inter-train interval (ITI), average frequency, total duration and total number of pulses and plotted them against the percent improvement on the outcome scale. Specifically, we compared 10 Hz trains with ITIs of 8 s (protocol A) and 26 s (protocol B) on cultured cortical neurons. In the experiments, protocol A with 8-s ITIs resulted in more frequent response failures, while practically no response failures occurred with protocol B (26-s intervals). The HFrTMS protocol analysis exhibited no significant effect of ITIs on protocol efficiency. In the neuronal culture, longer ITIs appeared to allow the neuronal response to recover. In the available human dataset on both depression and chronic pain, data concerning shorter ITIs is does not allow a significant conclusion. NRF may interfere with the efficacy of rTMS stimulation protocols when the average stimulation frequency is too high, proposing ITIs as a variable in rTMS protocol efficacy. Clinical trials are necessary to examine effect of shorter ITIs on the clinical outcome in a controlled setting.

摘要

重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)已被证明对治疗神经精神疾病有效,有A级(明确疗效)证据支持其对抑郁症和疼痛的治疗(勒福舍尔等人,2014年)。然而,刺激方案的疗效差异很大。高频重复经颅磁刺激(HFrTMS)使神经元放电饱和而不允许有恢复时间,可能会导致神经元反应失败(NRFs),从而影响更高频率刺激的疗效。为了研究不同rTMS时间刺激模式的疗效,重点关注与反应失败相关的可能的刺激上限。方案模式源自已发表的关于治疗抑郁症和疼痛的rTMS临床研究。将它们与细胞培养中的传导失败进行比较。从57篇使用评定为治疗抑郁症和疼痛A级方案的论文(勒福舍尔等人,2014年)中,我们提取了组间间隔(ITI)、平均频率、总时长和脉冲总数,并将它们与结果量表上的改善百分比进行对比。具体而言,我们在培养的皮质神经元上比较了间隔时间为8秒(方案A)和26秒(方案B)的10赫兹序列。在实验中,间隔时间为8秒的方案A导致反应失败更频繁,而方案B(间隔26秒)几乎没有出现反应失败。HFrTMS方案分析显示,组间间隔对方案效率没有显著影响。在神经元培养中,更长的组间间隔似乎能使神经元反应恢复。在现有的关于抑郁症和慢性疼痛的人类数据集中,关于较短组间间隔的数据无法得出有意义的结论。当平均刺激频率过高时,神经元反应失败可能会干扰rTMS刺激方案的疗效,这表明组间间隔是rTMS方案疗效的一个变量。有必要进行临床试验,在可控环境下研究较短组间间隔对临床结果的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验