Monash Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Epworth Centre for Innovation in Mental Health, Epworth HealthCare, Camberwell, Victoria, Australia.
Depress Anxiety. 2019 Aug;36(8):723-731. doi: 10.1002/da.22894. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
BACKGROUND: Anxiety symptoms are common in major depressive disorder. Whilst therapeutic efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in depression is well-established, minimal research has investigated rTMS's efficacy in treating anxiety symptoms in depression. METHODS: This study investigates the effectiveness of rTMS in treating anxiety symptoms in depression, specifically the relative efficacy of the three rTMS protocols commonly used in clinical practice: left-sided high-frequency, right-sided low-frequency and sequential bilateral rTMS. Antidepressant efficacy of each rTMS protocol is also investigated. Treatment data for 697 patients were pooled from three studies across five sites. Changes in Beck's Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale over 4-week rTMS courses were analysed using latent growth curve modelling. RESULTS: All rTMS protocols were effective in treating anxiety symptoms (mean BAI reduction, 8.13 points; p < 0.001) and depressive symptoms. Near therapeutic equivalence was seen across the three protocols. Improvement in depressive severity positively correlated with improvement in anxiety. Both high- and low-baseline anxiety scores showed overall symptom reduction. CONCLUSIONS: This study addresses the clinical knowledge gap pertaining to rTMS's therapeutic efficacy in treating anxiety symptoms in depression and the relative efficacy of three commonly used stimulation protocols. Our findings suggest therapeutic equivalence across left-sided high-frequency, right-sided low-frequency, and sequential bilateral rTMS approaches.
背景:焦虑症状在重度抑郁症中很常见。虽然重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)在抑郁症中的治疗效果已得到充分证实,但很少有研究探讨 rTMS 在治疗抑郁症中焦虑症状的疗效。
方法:本研究调查 rTMS 治疗抑郁症中焦虑症状的效果,特别是三种在临床实践中常用的 rTMS 方案的相对疗效:左侧高频、右侧低频和序贯双侧 rTMS。还研究了每种 rTMS 方案的抗抑郁疗效。从五个地点的三个研究中汇总了 697 名患者的治疗数据。使用潜在增长曲线模型分析 4 周 rTMS 疗程中贝克焦虑量表(BAI)和汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表的变化。
结果:所有 rTMS 方案均有效治疗焦虑症状(平均 BAI 降低 8.13 分;p<0.001)和抑郁症状。三种方案之间存在近乎治疗等效性。抑郁严重程度的改善与焦虑的改善呈正相关。高基线和低基线焦虑评分均显示出整体症状减轻。
结论:本研究解决了与 rTMS 在治疗抑郁症中焦虑症状的疗效以及三种常用刺激方案的相对疗效相关的临床知识空白。我们的研究结果表明,左侧高频、右侧低频和序贯双侧 rTMS 方法之间具有治疗等效性。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019-4-8
Am J Psychiatry. 2025-6-1