• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

训练间隔对经颅磁刺激诱导运动诱发电位重复抑制的影响。

Effect of inter-train interval on the induction of repetition suppression of motor-evoked potentials using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

作者信息

Pitkänen Minna, Kallioniemi Elisa, Julkunen Petro

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.

Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jul 19;12(7):e0181663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181663. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0181663
PMID:28723977
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5517025/
Abstract

Repetition suppression (RS) is evident as a weakened response to repeated stimuli after the initial response. RS has been demonstrated in motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) induced with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Here, we investigated the effect of inter-train interval (ITI) on the induction of RS of MEPs with the attempt to optimize the investigative protocols. Trains of TMS pulses, targeted to the primary motor cortex by neuronavigation, were applied at a stimulation intensity of 120% of the resting motor threshold. The stimulus trains included either four or twenty pulses with an inter-stimulus interval (ISI) of 1 s. The ITI was here defined as the interval between the last pulse in a train and the first pulse in the next train; the ITIs used here were 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 12, and 17 s. RS was observed with all ITIs except with the ITI of 1 s, in which the ITI was equal to ISI. RS was more pronounced with longer ITIs. Shorter ITIs may not allow sufficient time for a return to baseline. RS may reflect a startle-like response to the first pulse of a train followed by habituation. Longer ITIs may allow more recovery time and in turn demonstrate greater RS. Our results indicate that RS can be studied with confidence at relatively short ITIs of 6 s and above.

摘要

重复抑制(RS)表现为在初始反应后对重复刺激的反应减弱。重复抑制已在经颅磁刺激(TMS)诱发的运动诱发电位(MEP)中得到证实。在此,我们研究了串间间隔(ITI)对MEP重复抑制诱导的影响,试图优化研究方案。通过神经导航将TMS脉冲串靶向初级运动皮层,以静息运动阈值的120%的刺激强度施加。刺激串包括四个或二十个脉冲,刺激间隔(ISI)为1秒。这里的ITI定义为一串中的最后一个脉冲与下一串中的第一个脉冲之间的间隔;这里使用的ITI为1、3、4、6、7、12和17秒。除了ITI为1秒(此时ITI等于ISI)外,在所有ITI下均观察到重复抑制。ITI越长,重复抑制越明显。较短的ITI可能没有足够的时间恢复到基线。重复抑制可能反映了对一串中的第一个脉冲的类似惊吓的反应,随后是习惯化。较长的ITI可能允许更多的恢复时间,进而表现出更大的重复抑制。我们的结果表明,可以在6秒及以上的相对较短的ITI下可靠地研究重复抑制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8748/5517025/ed3ce164b5ac/pone.0181663.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8748/5517025/14fefc6b5945/pone.0181663.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8748/5517025/ed3ce164b5ac/pone.0181663.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8748/5517025/14fefc6b5945/pone.0181663.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8748/5517025/ed3ce164b5ac/pone.0181663.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of inter-train interval on the induction of repetition suppression of motor-evoked potentials using transcranial magnetic stimulation.训练间隔对经颅磁刺激诱导运动诱发电位重复抑制的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 19;12(7):e0181663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181663. eCollection 2017.
2
Repetition suppression in transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potentials is modulated by cortical inhibition.经颅磁刺激诱发的运动诱发电位中的重复抑制受皮层抑制调节。
Neuroscience. 2015 Dec 3;310:504-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.09.056. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
3
Longer Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Intertrial Interval Increases Size, Reduces Variability, and Improves the Reliability of Motor Evoked Potentials.长的经颅磁刺激试验间隔增加运动诱发电位的幅度、降低变异性并提高其可靠性。
Brain Connect. 2019 Dec;9(10):770-776. doi: 10.1089/brain.2019.0714.
4
Does second-scale intertrial interval affect motor evoked potentials induced by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation?第二尺度的试验间间隔是否会影响单次经颅磁刺激诱发的运动诱发电位?
Brain Stimul. 2012 Oct;5(4):526-32. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
5
Repetition suppression in the cortical motor and auditory systems resemble each other--a combined TMS and evoked potential study.皮质运动和听觉系统中的重复抑制相似——一项经颅磁刺激和诱发电位联合研究。
Neuroscience. 2013 Jul 23;243:40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.03.060. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
6
Cumulative effects of single TMS pulses during beta-tACS are stimulation intensity-dependent.经β-tACS 单次 TMS 脉冲的累积效应与刺激强度有关。
Brain Stimul. 2017 Nov-Dec;10(6):1055-1060. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
7
Quadro-pulse stimulation is more effective than paired-pulse stimulation for plasticity induction of the human motor cortex.四脉冲刺激在诱导人类运动皮质可塑性方面比双脉冲刺激更有效。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Dec;118(12):2672-82. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.09.062. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
8
Ongoing cumulative effects of single TMS pulses on corticospinal excitability: An intra- and inter-block investigation.单次经颅磁刺激脉冲对皮质脊髓兴奋性的持续累积效应:组内和组间研究。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan;127(1):621-628. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
9
Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex.人类运动皮层的短程训练、单相和双相重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)之间的比较。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Mar;116(3):605-13. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.09.020. Epub 2004 Nov 5.
10
Repeated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation-Induced Motor Evoked Potentials Correlate With the Subject-Specific Serum Metabolic Profile of Creatine.重复经颅磁刺激诱导的运动诱发电位与个体特异性血清肌酸代谢谱相关。
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 May;36(3):229-235. doi: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000568.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrating virtual reality, electroencephalography, and transcranial magnetic stimulation to study the neural correlates of awe experiences: The SUBRAIN protocol.整合虚拟现实、脑电图和经颅磁刺激以研究敬畏体验的神经关联:SUBRAIN方案。
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 2;20(4):e0302762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302762. eCollection 2025.
2
Motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation: interpreting a simple measure of a complex system.经颅磁刺激引发的运动电位:解读复杂系统的简单测量方法。
J Physiol. 2023 Jul;601(14):2827-2851. doi: 10.1113/JP281885. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
3
Cold Cognition as Predictor of Treatment Response to rTMS; A Retrospective Study on Patients With Unipolar and Bipolar Depression.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of inter-train interval on the plastic effects of rTMS.训练间隔对重复经颅磁刺激可塑性效应的影响。
Brain Stimul. 2017 May-Jun;10(3):630-636. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
2
Brain regions that show repetition suppression and enhancement: A meta-analysis of 137 neuroimaging experiments.显示重复抑制和增强的脑区:137项神经影像学实验的荟萃分析。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Apr;38(4):1894-1913. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23492. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
3
Repetition suppression in transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potentials is modulated by cortical inhibition.
冷认知作为重复经颅磁刺激治疗反应的预测指标:一项关于单相和双相抑郁症患者的回顾性研究
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jul 25;16:888472. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.888472. eCollection 2022.
4
The Problem and Potential of TMS' Infinite Parameter Space: A Targeted Review and Road Map Forward.经颅磁刺激无限参数空间的问题与潜力:一项针对性综述及未来路线图
Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 10;13:867091. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.867091. eCollection 2022.
5
Stimulation Parameters Used During Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery and Corticospinal Excitability Modulation in SCI: A Scoping Review.脊髓损伤中用于运动恢复和皮质脊髓兴奋性调制的重复经颅磁刺激期间使用的刺激参数:一项范围综述。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Apr 7;16:800349. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.800349. eCollection 2022.
6
Fast acquisition of resting motor threshold with a stimulus-response curve - Possibility or hazard for transcranial magnetic stimulation applications?通过刺激-反应曲线快速获取静息运动阈值——经颅磁刺激应用中的可能性还是风险?
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2021 Dec 17;7:7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2021.10.005. eCollection 2022.
7
Brain Response Induced with Paired Associative Stimulation Is Related to Repetition Suppression of Motor Evoked Potential.配对联想刺激诱发的脑反应与运动诱发电位的重复抑制有关。
Brain Sci. 2020 Sep 26;10(10):674. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10100674.
8
Interaction between repetition suppression in motor activation and long-interval intracortical inhibition.运动激活中的重复抑制与长时程皮质内抑制之间的相互作用。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 8;9(1):11543. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-47932-9.
9
Less Might Be More: Conduction Failure as a Factor Possibly Limiting the Efficacy of Higher Frequencies in rTMS Protocols.少或许就是多:传导失败可能是限制重复经颅磁刺激治疗方案中更高频率疗效的一个因素。
Front Neurosci. 2018 May 28;12:358. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00358. eCollection 2018.
经颅磁刺激诱发的运动诱发电位中的重复抑制受皮层抑制调节。
Neuroscience. 2015 Dec 3;310:504-11. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.09.056. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
4
The auditory-evoked arousal modulates motor cortex excitability.听觉诱发的觉醒调节运动皮层兴奋性。
Neuroscience. 2014 Aug 22;274:403-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.05.060. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
5
What Makes the Muscle Twitch: Motor System Connectivity and TMS-Induced Activity.是什么引发了肌肉抽搐:运动系统连接性与经颅磁刺激诱导的活动。
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Sep;25(9):2346-53. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu032. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
6
Potentiation instead of habituation characterizes visual evoked potentials in migraine patients between attacks.间歇期偏头痛患者的视觉诱发电位表现为增效而非习惯化。
Eur J Neurol. 1995 Apr;2(2):115-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.1995.tb00103.x.
7
Repetition suppression in the cortical motor and auditory systems resemble each other--a combined TMS and evoked potential study.皮质运动和听觉系统中的重复抑制相似——一项经颅磁刺激和诱发电位联合研究。
Neuroscience. 2013 Jul 23;243:40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.03.060. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
8
Does second-scale intertrial interval affect motor evoked potentials induced by single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation?第二尺度的试验间间隔是否会影响单次经颅磁刺激诱发的运动诱发电位?
Brain Stimul. 2012 Oct;5(4):526-32. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2011.07.006. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
9
Covert movements trigger repetition suppression of electroencephalography in sensorimotor cortex.隐蔽运动引发感觉运动皮层脑电图的重复抑制。
Neuroreport. 2011 Feb 16;22(3):141-5. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283436d84.
10
Corticospinal output and cortical excitation-inhibition balance in distal hand muscle representations in nonprimary motor area.非初级运动区远侧手部肌肉代表区的皮质脊髓输出和皮质兴奋-抑制平衡。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Oct;32(10):1692-703. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21137. Epub 2010 Sep 30.