• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基本医疗保险与补充医疗保险:医疗服务可及性与成本效益的作用。

Basic versus supplementary health insurance: Access to care and the role of cost effectiveness.

机构信息

CentER, TILEC, Department of Economics, Tilburg University, P.O. Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands; CEPR, London, UK.

出版信息

J Health Econ. 2018 Jul;60:53-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.05.002
PMID:29913308
Abstract

In a model where patients face budget constraints that make some treatments unaffordable without health insurance, we ask which treatments should be covered by universal basic insurance and which by private voluntary insurance. We argue that next to cost effectiveness, prevalence is important if the government wants to maximize the welfare gain that it gets from its health budget. Conditions are derived under which basic insurance should cover treatments that are mainly used by high risk agents with low income.

摘要

在一个患者面临预算限制的模型中,如果没有健康保险,一些治疗将无法负担,我们会问哪些治疗应该由全民基本保险覆盖,哪些应该由私人自愿保险覆盖。我们认为,如果政府希望从其卫生预算中获得最大的福利收益,那么除了成本效益外,流行程度也很重要。在一定条件下,基本保险应该覆盖主要由低收入高风险人群使用的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Basic versus supplementary health insurance: Access to care and the role of cost effectiveness.基本医疗保险与补充医疗保险:医疗服务可及性与成本效益的作用。
J Health Econ. 2018 Jul;60:53-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 31.
2
Access to health insurance. Year end issue brief.医疗保险的获取。年终问题简报。
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv. 2008 Jan 7:1-33.
3
Health financing and insurance reform in Morocco.摩洛哥的卫生筹资与保险改革。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Jul-Aug;26(4):1009-16. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.4.1009.
4
Determinants of Health Insurance Coverage among People Aged 45 and over in China: Who Buys Public, Private and Multiple Insurance.中国45岁及以上人群医疗保险覆盖情况的决定因素:谁购买公共保险、私人保险和多重保险。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 26;11(8):e0161774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161774. eCollection 2016.
5
Incremental change in the Australian health care system.澳大利亚医疗保健系统的渐进式变革。
Health Aff (Millwood). 1999 May-Jun;18(3):95-110. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.18.3.95.
6
Mass. appeal?大众吸引力?
Hosp Health Netw. 2009 May;83(5):26-9, 2.
7
Long-term care financing: lessons from France.长期护理融资:法国的经验教训。
Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):359-91. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12125.
8
The impact of public insurance expansions on children's access and use of care.公共保险扩张对儿童获得医疗服务及使用医疗服务的影响。
Pediatrics. 2006 Oct;118(4):1676-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0004.
9
Health insurance reform and the development of health insurance plans: the case of the Emirate of Abu Dhabi, UAE.医疗保险改革与医疗保险计划的发展:以阿联酋阿布扎比酋长国为例
J Health Care Finance. 2014 Spring;40(3):47-66.
10
Addressing inequity in health and health care in Mexico.解决墨西哥卫生与医疗保健方面的不平等问题。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 May-Jun;21(3):47-56. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.3.47.

引用本文的文献

1
Address sustainability risks in health insurance funds: generational actuarial balance and intergenerational equity perspective.应对健康保险基金中的可持续性风险:代际精算平衡与代际公平视角
Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 8;13:1641233. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1641233. eCollection 2025.
2
Health economics assessment of statin therapy initiation thresholds for atherosclerosis prevention in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.中国他汀类药物治疗起始阈值用于动脉粥样硬化预防的卫生经济学评估:一项成本效益分析
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 24;24(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02391-9.
3
Impact of supplementary private health insurance on hospitalization and physical examination in China.
补充性私人医疗保险对中国住院治疗和体检的影响。
China Econ Rev. 2020 Oct;63:101514. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101514. Epub 2020 Jul 3.
4
Association Between Supplemental Private Health Insurance and Burden of Out-of-Pocket Healthcare Expenditure in China: A Novel Approach to Estimate Two-Part Model with Random Effects Using Panel Data.中国补充性私人医疗保险与自付医疗费用负担之间的关联:一种使用面板数据估计具有随机效应的两部模型的新方法。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Apr 14;13:323-334. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S223045. eCollection 2020.
5
Risk selection into supplemental private health insurance in China.中国补充性私人医疗保险的风险选择
Health Econ Rev. 2019 Dec 17;9(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13561-019-0252-8.
6
Economic Evaluation of the 2016 Chinese Guideline and Alternative Risk Thresholds of Initiating Statin Therapy for the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.2016 年中国指南的经济学评价及他汀类药物起始治疗动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的替代风险阈值。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jul;37(7):943-952. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00791-8.
7
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the Context of US Commercial Health Insurance.美国商业健康保险背景下的成本效益分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jun;37(6):743-744. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00780-x.