• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国他汀类药物治疗起始阈值用于动脉粥样硬化预防的卫生经济学评估:一项成本效益分析

Health economics assessment of statin therapy initiation thresholds for atherosclerosis prevention in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

作者信息

Feng Tianyu, Zhang Xiaolin, Xu Jiaying, Gao Shang, Yu Xihe

机构信息

School of Public Health, Chongqin Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, Chongqing, China.

School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 24;24(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02391-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12939-025-02391-9
PMID:39856721
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11762857/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent updates to the Chinese guidelines for dyslipidemia management have reduced the 10-year risk threshold for starting statins in the primary prevention of atherosclerotic heart disease. This study aims to evaluate the potential negative effects of different statin initiation thresholds on diabetes risk in the Chinese population, while also analyzing their health economic implications.

METHODS

I We developed a microsimulation model based on event probabilities to assess the cost-effectiveness of statin therapy. The model utilized the China-PAR prediction tool for ASCVD risk and incorporated data from a nationally representative survey and published meta-analyses of middle-aged and elderly Chinese populations. Four strategies were evaluated: a 7.5% 10-year risk threshold, the current guideline strategy, and a 15% threshold. For each strategy, we calculated the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) to gain insights into the economic impact of each approach.

RESULT

The incremental cost per QALY for the 10% 10-year risk threshold strategy, compared to the untreated, was $52,218.75. The incremental cost per QALY for the guideline strategy, compared to the 7.5% 10-year risk threshold strategy, was $464,614.36. These results were robust in most sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Maintaining the recommended thresholds outlined in the current guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia may represent a cost-effective option for China at present. Variations in statin prices and the risk of statin-induced diabetes have significant impacts on the cost-effectiveness outcomes.

摘要

背景

中国血脂异常管理指南的最新更新降低了在动脉粥样硬化性心脏病一级预防中启动他汀类药物治疗的10年风险阈值。本研究旨在评估不同他汀类药物起始阈值对中国人群糖尿病风险的潜在负面影响,同时分析其健康经济学意义。

方法

我们基于事件概率开发了一个微观模拟模型,以评估他汀类药物治疗的成本效益。该模型利用了中国动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险预测工具(China-PAR),并纳入了来自全国代表性调查的数据以及已发表的中国中老年人群的荟萃分析数据。评估了四种策略:10年风险阈值为7.5%、当前指南策略以及15%的阈值。对于每种策略,我们计算了每获得一个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量成本,以深入了解每种方法的经济影响。

结果

与未治疗相比,10年风险阈值为10%的策略每QALY的增量成本为52,218.75美元。与10年风险阈值为7.5%的策略相比,指南策略每QALY的增量成本为464,614.36美元。在大多数敏感性分析中,这些结果都是稳健的。

结论

目前,维持现行血脂异常管理指南中推荐的阈值可能是中国具有成本效益的选择。他汀类药物价格的变化以及他汀类药物诱发糖尿病的风险对成本效益结果有重大影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fb9/11762857/08660d93aeb5/12939_2025_2391_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fb9/11762857/9f187c4715d9/12939_2025_2391_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fb9/11762857/ef758d26d420/12939_2025_2391_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fb9/11762857/08660d93aeb5/12939_2025_2391_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fb9/11762857/9f187c4715d9/12939_2025_2391_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fb9/11762857/ef758d26d420/12939_2025_2391_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4fb9/11762857/08660d93aeb5/12939_2025_2391_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Health economics assessment of statin therapy initiation thresholds for atherosclerosis prevention in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.中国他汀类药物治疗起始阈值用于动脉粥样硬化预防的卫生经济学评估:一项成本效益分析
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 24;24(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02391-9.
2
Economic Evaluation of the 2016 Chinese Guideline and Alternative Risk Thresholds of Initiating Statin Therapy for the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.2016 年中国指南的经济学评价及他汀类药物起始治疗动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的替代风险阈值。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jul;37(7):943-952. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00791-8.
3
Cost-effectiveness of 10-Year Risk Thresholds for Initiation of Statin Therapy for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.用于心血管疾病一级预防的他汀类药物治疗起始的10年风险阈值的成本效益
JAMA. 2015 Jul 14;314(2):142-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6822.
4
Cardiovascular Genetic Risk Testing for Targeting Statin Therapy in the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.心血管遗传风险检测用于指导他汀类药物治疗以预防动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的一级预防:一项成本效益分析。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018 Apr;11(4):e004171. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.004171.
5
Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease thresholds for statin initiation among people living with HIV in Thailand: A cost-effectiveness analysis.泰国艾滋病毒感染者他汀类药物起始治疗的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病阈值:成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 9;16(9):e0256926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256926. eCollection 2021.
6
Results of a Markov model analysis to assess the cost-effectiveness of statin therapy for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Korea: the Korean Individual-Microsimulation Model for Cardiovascular Health Interventions.韩国心血管健康干预个体化微观模拟模型评估韩国人群进行心血管疾病一级预防应用他汀类药物治疗的成本效果分析结果
Clin Ther. 2009 Dec;31(12):2919-30; discussion 2916-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.12.013.
7
Assessing long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of statin therapy in the UK: a modelling study using individual participant data sets.评估英国他汀类药物治疗的长期有效性和成本效益:一项使用个体参与者数据集的建模研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Dec;28(79):1-134. doi: 10.3310/KDAP7034.
8
Impact of China's Low Centralized Medicine Procurement Prices on the Cost-Effectiveness of Statins for the Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.中国药品集中采购低价对他汀类药物用于动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病一级预防的成本效益的影响
Glob Heart. 2020 Jun 25;15(1):43. doi: 10.5334/gh.830.
9
Cost-effectiveness of statins for primary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease among people living with HIV in the United States.美国 HIV 感染者一级预防动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的他汀类药物成本效益分析。
J Int AIDS Soc. 2021 Mar;24(3):e25690. doi: 10.1002/jia2.25690.
10
Cost-effectiveness of Contemporary Statin Use Guidelines With or Without Coronary Artery Calcium Assessment in African American Individuals.当代他汀类药物使用指南在非裔美国人中联合或不联合冠状动脉钙化评估的成本效益
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Aug 1;5(8):871-880. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1240.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence and Treatment of Diabetes in China, 2013-2018.中国糖尿病患病率及治疗状况 2013-2018 年
JAMA. 2021 Dec 28;326(24):2498-2506. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.22208.
2
Association of Statin Therapy Initiation With Diabetes Progression: A Retrospective Matched-Cohort Study.他汀类药物治疗启动与糖尿病进展的关联:一项回顾性匹配队列研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Dec 1;181(12):1562-1574. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.5714.
3
Statin Treatment-Induced Development of Type 2 Diabetes: From Clinical Evidence to Mechanistic Insights.他汀类药物治疗诱导的 2 型糖尿病:从临床证据到机制见解。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jul 2;21(13):4725. doi: 10.3390/ijms21134725.
4
Prevalence of diabetes recorded in mainland China using 2018 diagnostic criteria from the American Diabetes Association: national cross sectional study.中国 2018 年美国糖尿病协会诊断标准下的中国大陆糖尿病患病率:全国横断面研究。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 28;369:m997. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m997.
5
The Diabetes Mellitus-Atherosclerosis Connection: The Role of Lipid and Glucose Metabolism and Chronic Inflammation.糖尿病与动脉粥样硬化的关联:脂质和葡萄糖代谢及慢性炎症的作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Mar 6;21(5):1835. doi: 10.3390/ijms21051835.
6
Economic Evaluation of the 2016 Chinese Guideline and Alternative Risk Thresholds of Initiating Statin Therapy for the Management of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.2016 年中国指南的经济学评价及他汀类药物起始治疗动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病的替代风险阈值。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jul;37(7):943-952. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00791-8.
7
2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2018 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国心血管血管造影和介入学会/美国预防、物理治疗和康复医师学会/美国糖尿病协会/美国老年学会/美国药学会/美国医师协会/美国生理学会/北美介入放射学会/美国国家脂质协会/美国临床内分泌医师协会胆固醇管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组的报告。
Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):e1082-e1143. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625. Epub 2018 Nov 10.
8
Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban and aspirin compared to aspirin alone in patients with stable cardiovascular disease: An Australian perspective.利伐沙班与阿司匹林比较单独应用阿司匹林在稳定性心血管疾病患者中的成本效果分析:澳大利亚视角。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 1;270:54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.091. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
9
Basic versus supplementary health insurance: Access to care and the role of cost effectiveness.基本医疗保险与补充医疗保险:医疗服务可及性与成本效益的作用。
J Health Econ. 2018 Jul;60:53-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 May 31.
10
Impact of universal medical insurance system on the accessibility of medical service supply and affordability of patients in China.全民医疗保险制度对中国医疗服务供给可及性和患者负担能力的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0193273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193273. eCollection 2018.