Hesselbarth Sabine, Löwenstein Oliver, Cegla Thomas
Regionales Schmerz- und PalliativZentrum DGS Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Krankenhaus St. Josef, Wuppertal, Germany.
Scand J Pain. 2014 Apr 1;5(2):75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2014.01.004.
Background and aim Strong opioids including oxycodone are amongst the most effective analgesics to combat moderate to severe pain of various aetiologies, but opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD) represents a relevant problem. The rationale for development of a prolonged-release (PR) fixed combination of oxycodone and naloxone was to counteract OIBD. Due to its negligible oral bioavailability, the μ-opioid receptor antagonist naloxone is able to selectively displace opioids from local μ-receptors in the gastrointestinal tract without affecting central opioid binding sites. Pivotal trials of PR oxycodone/naloxone not only demonstrated improved bowel function but also equivalent analgesic efficacy compared to PR oxycodone alone. Controlled clinical trials comparing PR oxycodone/naloxone with strong opioids other than oxycodone are not available. The present study is the first data set aimed at comparing pain control, bowel function, and quality of life (QoL) in patients newly treated with or switched to PR oxycodone/naloxone or other strong opioids during routine clinical practice. Methods In this three-arm, prospective observational study, 588 patients with moderate to severe pain of varying aetiologies received either PR oxycodone/naloxone (OXN group and OXN 40/20 group with indicated use of the 40 mg/20 mg dose strength at baseline) or other strong opioids (control group), dosed according to pain severity, for 4-6 weeks. Data documented include pain intensity (NRS), bowel function (Bowel Function Index, BFI), pain-related functional impairment (BPI-SF), QoL (EuroQol EQ-5D-3L), and a global assessment of treatment. Results Patients receiving PR oxycodone/naloxone experienced a clinically important reduction in pain intensity and pain-related functional impairment of approximately 40%. The reductions of pain intensity (-2.9 ± 2.3) and pain-related functional impairment (-2.4 ± 2.3) in the OXN group were significantly more pronounced than in the control group (-2.1 ± 2.1 and -1.8 ± 1.7). In the control group, mean reductions in pain intensity did not reach the threshold of ≥30% for at least moderate clinically important differences, although patients were prescribed higher doses of morphine equivalents than OXN group patients. Improvements in bowel function (OXN: -16.0 ± 27.6; control: 3.1 ± 24.4) and QoL (OXN: 20.8 ± 24.2; control: 13.2 ± 23.1) were also significantly more pronounced in the OXN group, with BFI scores reduced to a level that reflects normal bowel function. Results for the OXN 40/20 group receiving higher doses of PR oxycodone/naloxone were in line with those for the OXN group. In the control group, more frequent gastrointestinal adverse events and less favourable ratings of tolerability resulted in a higher rate of treatment discontinuations due to adverse events. Conclusions In patients receiving PR oxycodone/naloxone, more favourable outcomes compared with other strong opioids regarding pain control, bowel function, and QoL were observed. Implications The present findings underline the value of PR oxycodone/naloxone in the management of patients with moderate to severe chronic pain. The data set further adds to our understanding of the benefits and risks of opioid treatment in routine clinical practice.
背景与目的 包括羟考酮在内的强效阿片类药物是治疗各种病因所致中重度疼痛最有效的镇痛药之一,但阿片类药物引起的肠道功能障碍(OIBD)是一个相关问题。开发羟考酮和纳洛酮的缓释(PR)固定复方制剂的基本原理是对抗OIBD。由于其口服生物利用度可忽略不计,μ-阿片受体拮抗剂纳洛酮能够选择性地将阿片类药物从胃肠道局部μ-受体上置换下来,而不影响中枢阿片类药物结合位点。PR羟考酮/纳洛酮的关键试验不仅证明肠道功能得到改善,而且与单独使用PR羟考酮相比镇痛效果相当。目前尚无将PR羟考酮/纳洛酮与除羟考酮之外的其他强效阿片类药物进行比较的对照临床试验。本研究是首个旨在比较在常规临床实践中初治或换用PR羟考酮/纳洛酮或其他强效阿片类药物的患者的疼痛控制、肠道功能和生活质量(QoL)的数据集。方法 在这项三臂前瞻性观察研究中,588例不同病因所致中重度疼痛患者接受PR羟考酮/纳洛酮(OXN组和OXN 40/20组,基线时按规定使用40 mg/20 mg剂量强度)或其他强效阿片类药物(对照组),根据疼痛严重程度给药4 - 6周。记录的数据包括疼痛强度(数字评分量表,NRS)、肠道功能(肠道功能指数,BFI)、疼痛相关功能损害(简明疼痛问卷-短式量表,BPI-SF)、QoL(欧洲五维度健康量表EQ-5D-3L)以及对治疗的总体评估。结果 接受PR羟考酮/纳洛酮的患者疼痛强度和疼痛相关功能损害在临床上有重要降低,降低幅度约为40%。OXN组的疼痛强度降低值(-2.9±2.3)和疼痛相关功能损害降低值(-2.4±2.3)明显大于对照组(-2.1±2.1和-1.8±1.7)。在对照组中,尽管给患者处方的吗啡等效剂量高于OXN组患者,但疼痛强度的平均降低未达到至少中度临床重要差异的≥30%阈值。OXN组的肠道功能改善(OXN:-16.0±27.6;对照组:3.1±24.4)和QoL改善(OXN:20.8±24.2;对照组:13.2±23.1)也明显更显著,BFI评分降低到反映正常肠道功能的水平。接受更高剂量PR羟考酮/纳洛酮的OXN 40/20组的结果与OXN组一致。在对照组中,胃肠道不良事件更频繁且耐受性评分更差,导致因不良事件停药的发生率更高。结论 在接受PR羟考酮/纳洛酮的患者中,观察到在疼痛控制、肠道功能和QoL方面与其他强效阿片类药物相比有更有利的结果。意义 本研究结果强调了PR羟考酮/纳洛酮在中重度慢性疼痛患者管理中的价值。该数据集进一步增进了我们对常规临床实践中阿片类药物治疗的益处和风险的理解。