Landerholm Åsa H, Hansson Per T
Dept. of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Clinical Pain Research, Pain Center, Dept. of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet/University Hospital, Solna, S-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
Scand J Pain. 2011 Jan 1;2(1):9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2010.08.001.
Background and aim Pain due to a usually non-painful mechanical stimulus, mechanical allodynia, is an oppressive symptom in subgroups of patients with neuropathic pain. Dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA) is evoked by a normally innocuous light moving mechanical stimulus on the skin and static mechanical allodynia (SMA) by a sustained, normally innocuous pressure against the skin. DMA is claimed to be mediated by myelinated fibres and SMA by C-fibres. Also A-delta fibres have been implicated in the static subtype. A low intensity vertically applied stimulus of 1 second (s) is expected to activate predominantly rapidly adapting A-beta mechanoreceptors thus recruiting the same peripheral substrate as a horizontally moving brush on top of the skin. In patients with SMA we assumed an activation of Cbut also A-delta fibres from a static 10 s von Frey filament stimulus. The aim was to investigate if DMA and SMA could be assessed at perception threshold level using short or longer lasting usually non-painful von Frey filament prodding of the neuropathic skin. Patients and methods Eighteen patients with painful unilateral partial peripheral traumatic nerve injury suffering from SMA (n = 9) and/or DMA (n = 18) in a limb were studied. A compression/ischemia-induced (differential) nerve block in conjunction with repeated quantitative sensory testing of A-delta and C-fibre function using cold and warm stimuli was used to assess which nerve fibre population that contributes to pain at perception threshold level using 1 s (vF1) and 10 s (vF10) von Frey filament stimulation of the skin. Results The main outcome was the finding that elevation of vF1 and vF10 occurred simultaneously and significantly prior to an increase in the perception level to cold or warmth during the continuous nerve block. Single patients demonstrated a slight decrease in cold perception levels at the time of elevation of vF1 or vF10 and a possible contribution to mechanical allodynia from A-delta-fibres can therefore not completely be ruled out although the recorded alterations were minor. None of the patients reported an elevation of the perception level to warmth at the time of elevation of vF1 or vF10 excluding contribution from C-fibres. Further, only patients with clinically established SMA (n = 9) reported continuous pain to a sustained 10 s von Frey filament stimulation (vF10). Patients with only DMA (n = 9) reported pain merely for the initial 1-3 s of the total stimulus duration of 10 s and for a few seconds after the filament was lifted from the skin. Conclusions These findings support the role of A-beta fibres as peripheral mediators of both vF1 and vF10 although different receptor organs may be involved, i.e., rapidly (RA) and slowly (SA-I) adapting mechanoreceptors. Implications Techniques to quantify the different allodynias at perception threshold level deserve further attention as possible adjuncts to suprathreshold stimuli in intervention studies aimed at modifying these stimulus-evoked phenomena.
背景与目的 通常无痛的机械刺激所导致的疼痛,即机械性异常性疼痛,是神经性疼痛患者亚组中的一种压迫性症状。动态机械性异常性疼痛(DMA)由通常无害的皮肤表面轻移机械刺激诱发,而静态机械性异常性疼痛(SMA)则由持续的、通常无害的皮肤压力诱发。据称,DMA由有髓纤维介导,SMA由C纤维介导。此外,A-δ纤维也与静态亚型有关。预计1秒的低强度垂直施加刺激主要激活快速适应的A-β机械感受器,从而募集与皮肤表面水平移动刷子相同的外周底物。对于SMA患者,我们假定静态10秒的von Frey细丝刺激可激活C纤维以及A-δ纤维。目的是研究能否使用对神经性皮肤进行短时间或长时间通常无痛的von Frey细丝刺激,在感知阈值水平评估DMA和SMA。
患者与方法 研究了18例患有疼痛性单侧部分周围性创伤性神经损伤的患者,这些患者的一个肢体存在SMA(n = 9)和/或DMA(n = 18)。使用压迫/缺血诱导的(差异性)神经阻滞,并结合使用冷刺激和热刺激对A-δ纤维和C纤维功能进行重复定量感觉测试,以评估在使用1秒(vF1)和10秒(vF10)von Frey细丝刺激皮肤时,哪些神经纤维群体在感知阈值水平导致疼痛。
结果 主要结果是发现,在持续神经阻滞期间,vF1和vF10升高同时且显著先于冷或热感知水平升高。个别患者在vF1或vF10升高时冷感知水平略有下降,因此尽管记录的变化较小,但仍不能完全排除A-δ纤维对机械性异常性疼痛的可能贡献。在vF1或vF10升高时,没有患者报告热感知水平升高,排除了C纤维的贡献。此外,只有临床确诊为SMA的患者(n = 9)报告在持续10秒的von Frey细丝刺激(vF10)时持续疼痛。仅患有DMA的患者(n = 9)仅在10秒总刺激持续时间的最初1 - 3秒以及细丝从皮肤抬起后的几秒钟报告疼痛。
结论 这些发现支持A-β纤维作为vF1和vF10两者外周介质的作用,尽管可能涉及不同的感受器器官,即快速(RA)和缓慢(SA-I)适应的机械感受器。
意义 在旨在改变这些刺激诱发现象的干预研究中,作为超阈值刺激的可能辅助手段,在感知阈值水平量化不同异常性疼痛的技术值得进一步关注。