Dynamic mechanical allodynia in the secondary hyperalgesic area in the capsaicin model-Perceptually similar phenomena as in painful neuropathy?

Introduction In order to develop valid experimental human pain models, i.e., models potentially reflecting mechanisms underlying certain expressions of clinical pain conditions, similarities and discrepancies of symptoms/signs must first and foremost be evaluated comparing the two. In a situation where symptoms/signs appear to be similar, a potential pitfall with surrogate models would be that pathophysiological mechanisms in clinical conditions and experimental models might differ, i.e., one symptom/sign may be due to several different mechanisms. Symptoms and signs caused by intradermally injected capsaicin have been suggested to reflect aspects of the clinical phenomenology of neuropathic pain, e.g., dynamic mechanical allodynia. Psychophysical characteristics of brush-evoked pain in the pain area in patients with painful peripheral neuropathy were compared with brush-evoked pain in the secondary hyperalgesic area in capsaicin-treated skin in patients and in healthy subjects using different temporo-spatial stimulus parameters. Method Nine patients were examined in the area of painful neuropathy and subsequently in the corresponding contralateral secondary site, i.e., the secondary hyperalgesic area after an intradermal capsaicin injection. Nine healthy age- and sex-matched subjects were examined in a corresponding area after capsaicin injection. Brush-evoked allodynia was induced by lightly stroking 2 different distances of the skin 2 or 4 times with brushes of 2 different widths. Intensity and duration of brush-evoked allodynia was recorded using a computerized visual analogue scale. The total brush-evoked pain intensity, including aftersensation was calculated as the area under the curve. In addition, similarities and discrepancies in the selection of sensory-discriminative and affective descriptors of the painful experience have been surveyed in the area of neuropathy and in the area of secondary hyperalgesia. Results All patients reported brush-evoked pain in their area of painful neuropathy during all stimuli. Eight out of 9 patients reported brush-evoked pain in an area outside the flare in the capsaicin treated skin and only 3 out of 9 healthy subjects reported brush-evoked pain in an area outside the flare. Within patients there was no significant difference between sides regarding the influence of the various temporo-spatial stimulus parameters on the total brush-evoked pain intensity. Of all parameters tested, only increased number of strokes resulted in significantly higher brush-evoked pain intensity. The most commonly used sensory-discriminative descriptors during brush-evoked pain in the area of painful neuropathy and in the capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesic area in patients and controls were smarting and burning and for the affective descriptors troublesome and annoying. Conclusions Similarities were found regarding the influence of temporo-spatial stimulus parameters on brush-evoked allodynia in the capsaicin-induced secondary hyperalgesic area contralateral to the area of painful neuropathy and their influence when testing the area of neuropathic pain. Only 3/9 healthy subjects reported brush-evoked pain after capsaicin injection, a finding that may be related to this group reporting less spontaneous pain than the patients after injection. A hyperexcitable nervous system due to the contralateral clinical condition may also have a bearing on the frequent finding of capsaicin-induced allodynia in the patients (8/9). Implications The low prevalence of tactile allodynia in healthy volunteers makes the capsaicin model an unattractive strategy.