Peter C, Watson N
University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Scand J Pain. 2012 Jan 1;3(1):5-13. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2011.11.001.
Background The use of opioids for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) remains very controversial. There are a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showing efficacy and safety in the short-term, but long-term data are limited. Methods This article contains 10 case reports (followed to 2011) that were selected from a survey of 84 patients with intractable CNCP treated with opioids and followed every 3 months now for a median of 10 years. The previous published survey of this group reported outcomes of pain severity, adverse effects, pain relief, satisfaction, mood, problematic opioid use, tolerance, physical dependency, functional status, health-related quality of life (HRQL), immune status and sexual function. The outcome measures for that study included a numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Brief Pain Inventory Interference Scale (BPI-I), the Pain Disability Index (PDI), and for Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) the Short Form Health Survey 12 version 2 (SF12v2). These selected patient reports were chosen to illustrate some important aspects of the diagnostic categories of CNCP, the opioids and doses used, particular issues (concurrent addiction history, bipolar disorder, and combination therapy), disease-specific and other outcomes (pain severity and relief, adverse effects, mood, function) and duration of follow-up with complex pain problems. Results Opioids were found to be safe and effective in the long-term for these particular patients, as well as in the larger group from which they originate. Most patients in the total sample reported 50% or greater relief and a moderate improvement in disability. Scores for functional status and HRQL were not severely affected (PDI and BPI-I ratings moderate or less and SF12v2 slightly below normative values for age). Problematic use, tolerance, and serious adverse effects including constipation were not major issues. Conclusion These 10 reports of patients with intractable CNCP treated with opioids with some success over many years put a face on some of the participants in the larger survey of 84 suggesting that this approach is effective and safe for some patients over many years. Implications These data may not be generalizable to a larger population of patients with CNCP because of the probable selection of patients who benefit and who do not have intolerable adverse effects.
阿片类药物用于慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)仍然存在很大争议。有多项随机对照试验(RCT)表明其在短期内有效且安全,但长期数据有限。方法:本文包含10例病例报告(随访至2011年),这些病例选自对84例接受阿片类药物治疗的顽固性CNCP患者的调查,目前每3个月随访一次,中位随访时间为10年。此前对该组患者发表的调查报道了疼痛严重程度、不良反应、疼痛缓解情况、满意度、情绪、阿片类药物使用问题、耐受性、身体依赖性、功能状态、健康相关生活质量(HRQL)、免疫状态和性功能等结果。该研究的结局指标包括疼痛数字评定量表(NRS)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、简明疼痛问卷干扰量表(BPI - I)、疼痛残疾指数(PDI),以及用于健康相关生活质量(HRQL)的简短健康调查问卷第2版(SF12v2)。这些选定的患者报告旨在说明CNCP诊断类别、所使用的阿片类药物和剂量、特定问题(并发成瘾史、双相情感障碍和联合治疗)、疾病特异性及其他结果(疼痛严重程度和缓解情况、不良反应、情绪、功能)以及复杂疼痛问题的随访持续时间等一些重要方面。结果:发现阿片类药物对这些特定患者以及他们所来自的更大群体在长期使用中是安全有效的。总样本中的大多数患者报告疼痛缓解50%或更多,残疾情况有中度改善。功能状态和HRQL评分未受到严重影响(PDI和BPI - I评分为中度或更低,SF12v2略低于年龄标准化值)。使用问题、耐受性以及包括便秘在内的严重不良反应并非主要问题。结论:这10例接受阿片类药物治疗多年且取得一定成功的顽固性CNCP患者报告,让参与84例患者更大规模调查的部分参与者有了具体形象,表明这种方法对一些患者多年来是有效且安全的。启示:由于可能选择了受益且无无法耐受不良反应的患者,这些数据可能无法推广到更大的CNCP患者群体。