Nilsen Kristian B, Christiansen Sunniva E, Holmen Line B, Sand Trond
Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Neuroscience, Trondheim, Norway.
National Institute of Occupational Health, Dept. of Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders, Oslo, Norway.
Scand J Pain. 2012 Jul 1;3(3):142-148. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2012.04.005.
Background and purpose In animal studies, enhanced sensitivity to painful stimuli succeeding chronic stress has been reported, while acute stress is reported to induce analgesia. Human studies on the effect of mental stress on pain are more equivocal. A disturbed stress-response resulting in an increased sensitivity to painful stimuli has also been discussed as a potential mechanism for e.g., the fibromyalgia syndrome. Endogenous analgesia may be studied in humans by measuring the analgesic effect of heterotopic noxious conditioning stimulation. In neurophysiological animal studies this phenomenon was originally denoted "diffuse noxious inhibitory controls" (DNIC), but for human studies it has been suggested to use the term conditioned pain modulation (CPM). The clinical relevance of aberrances in CPM is not clear. Inhibitory CPM is reported as being reduced in several medically unexplained syndromes with musculoskeletal pain aggravated by mental stress. However, whether the reported reduced CPM effects are causally related to clinical pain is unknown. In the present study the effect of a mental stressor on CPM is studied. Methods With tourniquet-induced pain as the conditioning stimulus we estimated the CPM effect in twenty healthy subjects. Heat pain threshold (HPT), supra-threshold heat pain level (SHPL) and pressure pain threshold (PPT) were used as test stimuli. Measurements were performed at baseline, after a stressful task and after a non-stressful task presented in a blinded cross-over design. We used repeated-measures ANOVAs in the analysis with simple contrasts for post hoc analysis. Results With a ANOVA repeated measures model we found a significant task effect (F = 18.5, p ≤ 0.001), indicating that CPM was successfully induced. In our ANOVA model, we found a significant effect of stress in the contrast analysis (F = 5.2, p = 0.037), indicating that CPM was affected by the stressful task. The effects on PPT could not be analyzed due to a significant carry-over effect (for PPT only). Conclusions In the present blinded crossover study, we found a significant small to medium inhibitory effect of mental stress upon the CPM of thermal pain. Implications Our results suggest that previously reported reduced inhibitory CPM in several medically unexplained syndromes with musculoskeletal pain aggravated by mental stress possibly can be related to confounding or clinically relevant stress level differences. However, the result might be modality-specific. Further studies in patients are obviously needed, and the impact of mental stress on CPM should be investigated also with other stressors.
背景与目的 在动物研究中,已有报告称慢性应激后对疼痛刺激的敏感性增强,而急性应激则据报道会诱导镇痛作用。关于精神应激对疼痛影响的人体研究结果则更为模糊。应激反应紊乱导致对疼痛刺激的敏感性增加也被讨论为例如纤维肌痛综合征等疾病的潜在机制。内源性镇痛作用可通过测量异位有害条件刺激的镇痛效果在人体中进行研究。在神经生理学动物研究中,这一现象最初被称为“弥漫性有害抑制控制”(DNIC),但对于人体研究,有人建议使用“条件性疼痛调制”(CPM)这一术语。CPM异常的临床相关性尚不清楚。据报道,在一些医学上无法解释的综合征中,抑制性CPM降低,这些综合征中肌肉骨骼疼痛会因精神应激而加重。然而,所报道的CPM效应降低是否与临床疼痛存在因果关系尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们研究了精神应激源对CPM的影响。
方法 以止血带诱导的疼痛作为条件刺激,我们评估了20名健康受试者的CPM效应。热痛阈值(HPT)、阈上热痛水平(SHPL)和压痛阈值(PPT)被用作测试刺激。测量在基线、一项应激任务后以及一项非应激任务后进行,采用双盲交叉设计。我们在分析中使用重复测量方差分析,并进行简单对比以进行事后分析。
结果 使用重复测量方差分析模型,我们发现了显著的任务效应(F = 18.5,p≤0.001),表明CPM被成功诱导。在我们的方差分析模型中,我们在对比分析中发现了应激的显著效应(F = 5.2,p = 0.037),表明CPM受到应激任务的影响。由于显著的遗留效应(仅针对PPT),无法对PPT的效应进行分析。
结论 在本双盲交叉研究中,我们发现精神应激对热痛的CPM有显著的小到中等程度的抑制作用。
意义 我们的结果表明,先前报道的在一些医学上无法解释的综合征中抑制性CPM降低,这些综合征中肌肉骨骼疼痛会因精神应激而加重,这可能与混杂因素或临床相关的应激水平差异有关。然而,结果可能具有模态特异性。显然需要在患者中进行进一步研究,并且还应使用其他应激源来研究精神应激对CPM的影响。