Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), SMI, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Pain Med. 2020 Feb 1;21(2):317-325. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz115.
Stress and pain have been interrelated in clinical widespread pain conditions. Studies indicate that acute experimental stress in healthy volunteers has a negative effect on the descending inhibitory pain control system and thus the ability to inhibit one painful stimulus with another (conditioned pain modulation [CPM]) although without effect on general pain sensitivity. CPM effects can be assessed immediately after the stress induction, whereas some physiological stress responses (e.g., cortisol release) are delayed and longer lasting. It is unclear whether CPM may relate to stress-induced increases in cortisol.
Twenty-five healthy men had CPM effects measured over a period of 10 minutes. Pain detection thresholds (PDTs) were assessed by repeated test stimuli with cuff algometry on one leg, with and without painful cuff pressure conditioning on the contralateral leg. CPM effects, assessed as the increase in PDT during conditioning stimulation compared with without, were measured before and after experimental stress and a control condition (Montreal Imaging Stress Task [MIST]). Saliva cortisol levels and self-perceived stress were collected.
Participants reported the MIST to be more stressful compared with the MIST control, but cortisol levels did not change significantly from baseline. In all sessions, PDT increased during conditioning (P = 0.001), although the MIST compared with the MIST control had no significant effect on PDT or CPM effects. A negative correlation between changes in cortisol and conditioned PDT was found when applying the MIST (P < 0.03).
No significant effect of stress was found on CPM compared with a matched control condition. Individual changes in experimental stress and in conditioned pain sensitivity may be linked with cortisol.
在临床广泛疼痛情况下,压力和疼痛一直相互关联。研究表明,健康志愿者的急性实验性应激对下行抑制性疼痛控制系统有负面影响,从而降低了用另一种疼痛刺激来抑制一种疼痛刺激的能力(条件性疼痛调制[CPM]),尽管对一般疼痛敏感性没有影响。CPM 效应可以在应激诱导后立即评估,而一些生理应激反应(例如皮质醇释放)则延迟且持续时间更长。尚不清楚 CPM 是否与应激引起的皮质醇增加有关。
25 名健康男性在 10 分钟的时间内测量 CPM 效应。通过在一条腿上用袖带测痛法进行重复测试刺激来评估疼痛检测阈值(PDT),同时在对侧腿上进行有疼痛袖带压力调节和无疼痛袖带压力调节。CPM 效应是通过在条件刺激期间与无条件刺激相比 PD T 的增加来评估的,在实验性应激和对照条件(蒙特利尔成像应激任务[MIST])前后进行测量。收集唾液皮质醇水平和自我感知的压力。
与 MIST 对照相比,参与者报告 MIST 更具压力,但皮质醇水平从基线没有显著变化。在所有情况下,PDT 在条件刺激期间增加(P = 0.001),尽管与 MIST 对照相比,MIST 对 PDT 或 CPM 效应没有显著影响。当应用 MIST 时,发现皮质醇变化与条件 PD T 之间存在负相关(P < 0.03)。
与匹配的对照条件相比,应激对 CPM 没有显著影响。实验性应激和条件性疼痛敏感性的个体变化可能与皮质醇有关。