• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质量圈作为年轻全科医生接管医疗业务的支持工具的应用。

The use of quality circles as a support tool in the taking over of practices by young general practitioners.

作者信息

Král Norbert, Seifert Bohumil, Kovář Jan, Mucha Cyril, Vojtíšková Jana, Bednár Jáchym, Martin Seifert

机构信息

First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Institute of General Practice, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

J Family Med Prim Care. 2018 Jan-Feb;7(1):5-10. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_167_17.

DOI:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_167_17
PMID:29915725
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5958592/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although informal meetings of healthcare professionals in smaller groups are common in the area of primary care in the Czech Republic, the method of quality circles is not in wide use. The aim of our project is to use this method to help new general practitioners (GPs) when they take over a medical practice and to suggest measures to improve the organization and overall attractiveness of new practices, as well as patient satisfaction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For the purposes of this observation, an already existing informal group formed by healthcare professionals and their trainees was used. The group met a total of four times in a 6-month period. In the first meeting, problematic areas were identified. In the second, specific issues of newly starting to practice were discussed, with time to consider suggestions for improvements. The third meeting consisted of an analysis of the suggested measures and their implementation, and in the fourth, these measures and their effects were evaluated.

RESULTS

On the basis of the discussion in the first and second meetings, suggestions were made, and then, during the third meeting, structured into three dimensions: (1) The organization of work, including clinical activities, (2) the attractiveness of the practice and the satisfaction levels of the patients, (3) the satisfaction levels of the employees. In each area, specific measures were proposed. The new doctors' feedback in the fourth phase of the project was positive. The main problems the new doctors faced were related to their lack of knowledge and experience with buying or starting their own practice, as well as being an effective team leader.

CONCLUSION

Despite the application of small groups being significantly larger, it was demonstrated that if GPs are given direction and clear goals in their meetings, these meetings can be very constructive. Small groups thus offer a good platform for young GPs in starting their own practice, giving them the capacity to do so.

摘要

引言

在捷克共和国,医疗保健专业人员以较小团体形式进行的非正式会议在初级保健领域很常见,但质量圈方法并未得到广泛应用。我们项目的目的是使用这种方法来帮助新的全科医生(GP)接管医疗业务,并提出措施以改善新业务的组织和整体吸引力,以及患者满意度。

材料与方法

为了此次观察,使用了一个由医疗保健专业人员及其实习生组成的现有非正式团体。该团体在6个月内共会面四次。在第一次会议上,确定了问题领域。在第二次会议上,讨论了新开始执业的具体问题,并留出时间考虑改进建议。第三次会议包括对建议措施及其实施情况的分析,在第四次会议上,对这些措施及其效果进行了评估。

结果

根据第一次和第二次会议的讨论,提出了建议,然后在第三次会议期间,将这些建议归纳为三个方面:(1)工作组织,包括临床活动;(2)业务的吸引力和患者的满意度;(3)员工的满意度。在每个领域都提出了具体措施。项目第四阶段新医生的反馈是积极的。新医生面临的主要问题与他们在购买或开办自己的业务方面缺乏知识和经验,以及作为有效的团队领导者有关。

结论

尽管应用的小组规模明显更大,但事实证明,如果在会议中给全科医生指明方向和明确目标,这些会议会非常有建设性。因此,小团体为年轻的全科医生开办自己的业务提供了一个很好的平台,使他们有能力这样做。

相似文献

1
The use of quality circles as a support tool in the taking over of practices by young general practitioners.质量圈作为年轻全科医生接管医疗业务的支持工具的应用。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2018 Jan-Feb;7(1):5-10. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_167_17.
2
3
Implementation of evidence-based knowledge in general practice.循证医学知识在全科医疗中的应用。
Dan Med J. 2017 Dec;64(12).
4
[Measuring, assessing, acting: A practice test of quality indicators for coronary heart disease].[测量、评估、行动:冠心病质量指标的实践检验]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Nov;137-138:9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.08.003. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
5
Perceived effectiveness of diagnostic and therapeutic guidelines in primary care quality circles.基层医疗质量改进小组中诊断与治疗指南的感知效果
Int J Qual Health Care. 2001 Jun;13(3):239-46. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/13.3.239.
6
[Implementation and evaluation of quality circles in general practice].[全科医疗中质量改进小组的实施与评估]
Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena). 1995 Aug;89(4):402-5.
7
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
8
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
9
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
10
The Experience and Effectiveness of Nurse Practitioners in Orthopaedic Settings: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.执业护士在骨科环境中的经验与成效:一项全面的系统评价
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(42 Suppl):1-22. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-249.

引用本文的文献

1
[Quality in statutory outpatient care: a modular system with varying approaches].[法定门诊医疗服务的质量:一个采用不同方法的模块化系统]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2022 Mar;65(3):302-309. doi: 10.1007/s00103-022-03496-0. Epub 2022 Feb 2.

本文引用的文献

1
New Zealand among global social media initiative leaders for primary care advocacy.新西兰在全球社交媒体推动初级保健宣传活动中处于领先地位。
J Prim Health Care. 2016 Jun;8(2):94-8. doi: 10.1071/HC15036.
2
Family medicine 360°: Global exchanges in family medicine.家庭医学360°:家庭医学的全球交流
J Family Med Prim Care. 2015 Jul-Sep;4(3):305-9. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.161302.
3
Young Doctor Movements: motives for membership among aspiring and young family physicians.年轻医生运动:有抱负的年轻家庭医生加入的动机
J Family Med Prim Care. 2015 Apr-Jun;4(2):177-81. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.154625.
4
Exploring why quality circles work in primary health care: a realist review protocol.探索质量改进小组在初级卫生保健中发挥作用的原因:一项实在论综述方案
Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 9;2:110. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-110.
5
Practice-based small group learning programs: systematic review.基于实践的小组学习计划:系统评价。
Can Fam Physician. 2012 Jun;58(6):637-42, e310-6.
6
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.审核与反馈:对专业实践和医疗结果的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Jun 13;2012(6):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub3.
7
Family medicine in post-communist Europe needs a boost. Exploring the position of family medicine in healthcare systems of Central and Eastern Europe and Russia.后共产主义欧洲的家庭医学需要大力发展。探索中东欧和俄罗斯的医疗保健系统中家庭医学的地位。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Mar 12;13:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-15.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis of practice facilitation within primary care settings.系统综述和荟萃分析初级保健环境中的实践促进。
Ann Fam Med. 2012 Jan-Feb;10(1):63-74. doi: 10.1370/afm.1312.
9
[General practitioners' guideline for palliative care. A survey of guideline acceptance in quality circles of primary medical care].[全科医生姑息治疗指南。基层医疗质量改进小组对指南接受情况的调查]
Med Klin (Munich). 2010 Mar;105(3):135-41. doi: 10.1007/s00063-010-1021-y. Epub 2010 Mar 28.
10
Quality circles to improve prescribing of primary care physicians. Three comparative studies.提高基层医疗医生处方质量的质量改进小组。三项比较研究。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Sep;18(9):763-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.1778.