• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patch Angioplasty or Primary Closure Following Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.症状性颈动脉狭窄行颈动脉内膜切除术后的补片血管成形术或一期缝合术
Surg J (N Y). 2018 Jun 15;4(2):e96-e101. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1655757. eCollection 2018 Apr.
2
A systematic review of patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术中外敷贴补片与直接缝合修复的系统评价
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1962-1974.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.096. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
3
Comparative Analysis of Patch Angioplasty Versus Selective Primary Closure during Carotid Endarterectomy Performed at a Single Vascular Center in China.在中国某单一血管中心行颈动脉内膜切除术时,贴补成形术与选择性一期缝合的对比分析。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73:344-350. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.11.036. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
4
Carotid endarterectomy outcome with vein or Dacron graft patch angioplasty and internal carotid artery shortening.采用静脉或涤纶补片血管成形术及颈内动脉缩短术的颈动脉内膜切除术的结果
J Vasc Surg. 1999 Apr;29(4):654-64. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70311-3.
5
Literature review of primary versus patching versus eversion as carotid endarterectomy closure.颈动脉内膜切除术闭合术的原发性与补丁与外翻的文献复习。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Aug;74(2):666-675. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.02.051. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
6
Carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty versus primary closure in patients with symptomatic and significant stenosis: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.有症状且严重狭窄患者行颈动脉内膜切除术加补片血管成形术与直接缝合术的比较:一项对随机临床试验的系统评价、荟萃分析及试验序贯分析
Syst Rev. 2021 May 6;10(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01692-8.
7
Prospective randomized trial of bilateral carotid endarterectomies: primary closure versus patching.双侧颈动脉内膜切除术的前瞻性随机试验:一期缝合与补片修补对比
Stroke. 1999 Jun;30(6):1185-9. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.6.1185.
8
Primary versus patching versus eversion as carotid endarterectomy closure.作为颈动脉内膜切除术闭合方式的直接缝合术与补片修补术与外翻缝合术的比较
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2023 Apr;64(2):174-183. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12618-8. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
9
Durability of eversion carotid endarterectomy: comparison with primary closure and carotid patch angioplasty.外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术的耐久性:与一期缝合及颈动脉补片血管成形术的比较
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Sep;34(3):453-8. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.117885.
10
Prospective randomized trial of ACUSEAL (Gore-Tex) vs Finesse (Hemashield) patching during carotid endarterectomy: long-term outcome.颈动脉内膜切除术中ACUSEAL(戈尔特斯)与Finesse(Hemashield)修补术的前瞻性随机试验:长期结果
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jul;48(1):99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.057. Epub 2008 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcome of primary closure following carotid endarterectomy with a novel technique: An 8-year multicenter cohort study.采用新技术行颈动脉内膜切除术后一期缝合的结果:一项为期8年的多中心队列研究。
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2024 Oct 28;11(1):101662. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2024.101662. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Selection criteria for patch angioplasty material in carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术斑块血管成形术材料的选择标准。
Surg Neurol Int. 2022 Aug 19;13:362. doi: 10.25259/SNI_470_2022. eCollection 2022.
3
Outcomes of Arteriotomy Closure Technique for Carotid Endarterectomy: Bovine Pericardial Patch Closure versus Primary Closure.颈动脉内膜切除术的动脉切开术闭合技术的结果:牛心包补片闭合与直接缝合。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Dec 1;37(6):37-6. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2020-0716.
4
Carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty versus primary closure in patients with symptomatic and significant stenosis: a systematic review with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.有症状且严重狭窄患者行颈动脉内膜切除术加补片血管成形术与直接缝合术的比较:一项对随机临床试验的系统评价、荟萃分析及试验序贯分析
Syst Rev. 2021 May 6;10(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01692-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Editor's Choice - Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS).编辑推荐——动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉和椎动脉疾病的管理:欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2017年临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;55(1):3-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
2
Primary closure after carotid endarterectomy is not inferior to other closure techniques.颈动脉内膜切除术后的一期缝合并不逊于其他缝合技术。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Sep;64(3):678-683.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.415. Epub 2016 May 14.
3
Complication Rate after Carotid Endarterectomy Comparing Patch Angioplasty and Primary Closure.颈动脉内膜切除术后比较补片血管成形术和直接缝合的并发症发生率
Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Jan;30:248-52. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.07.045. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
4
Effect of patching on reducing restenosis in the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial.在颈动脉血管重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验中,封堵对减少再狭窄的影响。
Stroke. 2015 Mar;46(3):757-61. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007634. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
5
Predictors of 30-day postoperative stroke or death after carotid endarterectomy using the 2012 carotid endarterectomy-targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.2012 年颈动脉内膜切除术靶向美国外科医师学院国家外科质量改进计划数据库评估颈动脉内膜切除术后 30 天卒中和死亡的预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;61(1):103-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.100. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
6
Closure technique after carotid endarterectomy influences local hemodynamics.颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)后的缝合技术会影响局部血流动力学。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Aug;60(2):418-27. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.01.069. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
7
Closing the loop: a 21-year audit of strategies for preventing stroke and death following carotid endarterectomy.闭环:颈动脉内膜切除术预防中风和死亡策略的 21 年审计。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Aug;46(2):161-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Jun 14.
8
Indications for treatment of recurrent carotid stenosis.治疗复发性颈动脉狭窄的适应证。
Br J Surg. 2013 Mar;100(4):440-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9027. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
9
Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease.美国血管外科学会更新的颅外颈动脉疾病管理指南。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3):e1-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.031.
10
Systematic review of randomized controlled trials of patch angioplasty versus primary closure and different types of patch materials during carotid endarterectomy.颈动脉内膜切除术中外敷成形术与一期缝合及不同类型补片材料的随机对照试验的系统评价。
Asian J Surg. 2011 Jan;34(1):32-40. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(11)60016-X.

症状性颈动脉狭窄行颈动脉内膜切除术后的补片血管成形术或一期缝合术

Patch Angioplasty or Primary Closure Following Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.

作者信息

Huizing Eline, Vos Cornelis G, Hulsebos Robin G, van den Akker Peter J, Borst Gert Jan de, Ünlü Çağdaş

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Northwest Clinics Alkmaar, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.

Department of Surgery, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Surg J (N Y). 2018 Jun 15;4(2):e96-e101. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1655757. eCollection 2018 Apr.

DOI:10.1055/s-0038-1655757
PMID:29915809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6003887/
Abstract

Guidelines recommend routine patching to prevent restenosis following carotid endarterectomy, mainly based on studies performed many years ago with different perioperative care and medical treatment compared with current standards. Aim of the present study was to compare primary closure (PRC) versus patch closure (PAC) in a contemporary cohort of patients.  Consecutive patients treated by carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic stenosis between January 2006 and April 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary outcome was restenosis at 6 weeks and 1 year and occurrence of ipsilateral stroke. Secondary outcomes were mortality, complications, and reintervention rates.  Five hundred carotid artery endarterectomies were performed. Fifty-nine patients were excluded because eversion endarterectomy was performed or because they were asymptomatic. PRC was performed in 349 and PAC in 92 patients. Restenosis at 6 weeks was 6.0% in the PAC group versus 3.0% in the PRC group (  = 0.200). Restenosis at 1 year was 31.6 versus 14.1%, respectively (  = 0.104). No difference was found for stroke (3.4 vs 1.1%,  = 0.319), death (1.1 vs 0.0%,  = 0.584), or other complications (1.1 vs 0.0%,  = 0.584), respectively.  It remains unclear whether routine patching should be recommended for all patients. A strategy of selective patching compared with routine patching, based on internal carotid artery diameter and other patient characteristics, deserves further investigation.

摘要

指南推荐常规使用补片以预防颈动脉内膜切除术后再狭窄,这主要基于多年前开展的研究,这些研究的围手术期护理和药物治疗与当前标准有所不同。本研究的目的是在当代患者队列中比较一期缝合(PRC)与补片修补(PAC)。

对2006年1月至2