Pool Natalie M
1 Clinical Assistant Professor, University of Arizona College of Nursing, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Nurs Sci Q. 2018 Jul;31(3):245-252. doi: 10.1177/0894318418774912.
Engaging in early and ongoing self-reflection during interpretive phenomenological research is critical for ensuring trustworthiness or rigor. However, the lack of guidelines and clarity about the role of self-reflection in this methodology creates both theoretical and procedural confusion. The purpose of this article is to describe key philosophical underpinnings, characteristics, and hallmarks of the process of self-reflection in interpretive phenomenological investigation and to provide a list of guidelines that facilitate this process. Excerpts from an interpretive phenomenological study are used to illustrate characteristics of quality self-reflection. The guidelines are intended to be particularly beneficial for novice researchers who may find self-reflective writing to be daunting and unclear. Facilitating use of self-reflection may strengthen both the interpretive phenomenological body of work as well as that of all qualitative research.
在解释现象学研究过程中尽早并持续进行自我反思,对于确保研究的可信度或严谨性至关重要。然而,关于自我反思在该方法论中的作用,缺乏相关指导方针且不够明晰,这造成了理论和程序上的混乱。本文旨在描述解释现象学调查中自我反思过程的关键哲学基础、特征和标志,并提供一系列有助于这一过程的指导方针。引用一项解释现象学研究的片段来说明高质量自我反思的特征。这些指导方针对于那些可能觉得自我反思性写作令人生畏且晦涩难懂的新手研究人员尤其有益。促进自我反思的运用可能会加强解释现象学的研究成果以及所有定性研究的成果。