Taino Giuseppe, Pugliese Franco, Bonetti Daniela, Astengo Rossana, Imbriani Marcello
IRCCS Istituti Cinici Scientifici Maugeri - Unità Operativa Ospedaliera di Medicina del Lavoro (UOOML) - Pavia.
AUSL Piacenza - Dipartimento Sicurezza Ausl di Piacenza.
G Ital Med Lav Ergon. 2017 Nov;39(2):100-105.
The topic of appropriateness was defined as the new frontier of development of health interventions. RH Brook in an Editorial published in the BMJ in 1994 defines the appropriateness "… an intervention for which the expected benefits are greater (with a sufficient margin) the possible negative consequences … excluding economic considerations". In workplaces the goal of appropriateness should cover not only the actions of health surveillance and health protocols, but also and primarily all stages of the risk assessment process.
Only through an assessment of occupational risks that aims to identify, evaluate and measure the real professional risk factors in specific working environments, it is possible to meet the requirements of effectiveness, efficiency and protection of ethical principles in the identification of priorities (according to values of person, community and society) that represent the size of the appropriateness of an intervention. At the same time, the risk assessment should provide to the occupational pyisician instruments to study with scientific, justifiable and reproducible criteria the possible correlation between damage to the worker's health and the occupational risk factors.
In the process of reporting of suspected technopathy, both for prevention purposes (according to art. 139 of Presidential Decree 1165/68, art. 10 of Legislative Decree 38/00 and DM 10 June 2014), both for insurance purposes (according to art. 53 of Presidential Decree 1165/68 and Ministerial Decree 9 April 2008), it should be considered two indispensable judgment elements to study the correlation between the disease and the work: on the one hand the level (measured or estimated) of the occupational risk factors; on the other hand the appropriateness of the risks assessment compared to the best and most current scientific evidence (Evidence Based Medicine - EBM), according to technical standards and specific guidelines.
Our study underlines the importance of appropriateness in the risk assessment process to analyze the correlation between the exposure to specific occupational hazards and the suspected technopathy.
适宜性这一主题被定义为健康干预发展的新前沿。RH·布鲁克在1994年发表于《英国医学杂志》的一篇社论中对适宜性的定义是“……一种预期益处大于(有足够余量)可能的负面后果的干预措施……不考虑经济因素”。在工作场所,适宜性的目标不仅应涵盖健康监测和健康规程的行动,而且主要应涵盖风险评估过程的所有阶段。
只有通过旨在识别、评估和测量特定工作环境中实际职业风险因素的职业风险评估,才有可能在确定代表干预措施适宜性程度的优先事项(根据个人、社区和社会的价值观)时满足有效性、效率和保护伦理原则的要求。同时,风险评估应向职业医生提供工具,以便用科学、合理且可重复的标准研究工人健康损害与职业风险因素之间的可能关联。
在报告疑似职业疾病的过程中,无论是出于预防目的(根据总统令1165/68第139条、立法令38/00第10条以及2014年6月10日的部长令),还是出于保险目的(根据总统令1165/68第53条和2008年4月9日的部长令),都应考虑两个不可或缺的判断要素来研究疾病与工作之间的关联:一方面是职业风险因素的水平(测量或估计的);另一方面是根据技术标准和特定指南,与最佳和最新科学证据(循证医学 - EBM)相比,风险评估的适宜性。
我们的研究强调了适宜性在风险评估过程中的重要性,以分析接触特定职业危害与疑似职业疾病之间的关联。