• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经肛门与机器人全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠腺癌的多中心配对比较。

A Multicenter Matched Comparison of Transanal and Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid and Low-rectal Adenocarcinoma.

机构信息

Center for Colon and Rectal Surgery, Surgical Health Outcomes Consortium (SHOC), Florida Hospital, Orlando, FL.

Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2019 Dec;270(6):1110-1116. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002862.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000002862
PMID:29916871
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the quality of surgical resection of transanal total mesorectal excision (TA-TME) and robotic total mesorectal excision (R-TME).

BACKGROUND

Both TA-TME and R-TME have been advocated to improve the quality of surgery for rectal cancer below 10 cm from the anal verge, but there are little data comparing TA-TME and R-TME.

METHODS

Data of patients undergoing TA-TME or R-TME for rectal cancer below 10 cm from the anal verge and a sphincter-saving procedure from 5 high-volume rectal cancer referral centers between 2011 and 2017 were obtained. Coarsened exact matching was used to create balanced cohorts of TA-TME and R-TME. The main outcome was the incidence of poor-quality surgical resection, defined as a composite measure including incomplete quality of TME, or positive circumferential resection margin (CRM) or distal resection margin (DRM).

RESULTS

Out of a total of 730 patients (277 TA-TME, 453 R-TME), matched groups of 226 TA-TME and 370 R-TME patients were created. These groups were well-balanced. The mean tumor height from the anal verge was 5.6 cm (SD 2.5), and 70% received preoperative radiotherapy. The incidence of poor-quality resection was similar in both groups (TA-TME 6.9% vs R-TME 6.8%; P = 0.954). There were no differences in TME specimen quality (complete or near-complete TA-TME 99.1% vs R-TME 99.2%; P = 0.923) and CRM (5.6% vs 6.0%; P = 0.839). DRM involvement may be higher after TA-TME (1.8% vs 0.3%; P = 0.051).

CONCLUSIONS

High-quality TME for patients with rectal adenocarcinoma of the mid and low rectum can be equally achieved by transanal or robotic approaches in skilled hands, but attention should be paid to the distal margin.

摘要

目的

比较经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TA-TME)和机器人全直肠系膜切除术(R-TME)的手术切除质量。

背景

TA-TME 和 R-TME 均被提倡用于提高距肛缘 10cm 以内直肠癌的手术质量,但比较 TA-TME 和 R-TME 的数据很少。

方法

获取了 2011 年至 2017 年间,来自 5 个高容量直肠癌转诊中心的接受 TA-TME 或 R-TME 治疗且保肛的距肛缘 10cm 以内直肠癌患者的数据。使用粗化精确匹配创建 TA-TME 和 R-TME 的平衡队列。主要结局是不良手术切除质量的发生率,定义为包括 TME 质量不完整、环周切缘阳性(CRM)或远端切缘阳性(DRM)的复合指标。

结果

共纳入 730 例患者(TA-TME 277 例,R-TME 453 例),创建了 226 例 TA-TME 和 370 例 R-TME 患者的匹配组。这些组之间的平衡良好。距肛缘的平均肿瘤高度为 5.6cm(标准差 2.5),70%的患者接受了术前放疗。两组不良切除质量的发生率相似(TA-TME 6.9% vs R-TME 6.8%;P=0.954)。TME 标本质量(完整或接近完整的 TA-TME 99.1% vs R-TME 99.2%;P=0.923)和 CRM(5.6% vs 6.0%;P=0.839)无差异。TA-TME 后 DRM 受累可能更高(1.8% vs 0.3%;P=0.051)。

结论

在熟练的术者手中,经肛门或机器人方法均可为中低位直肠腺癌患者实现高质量的 TME,但应注意远端切缘。

相似文献

1
A Multicenter Matched Comparison of Transanal and Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Mid and Low-rectal Adenocarcinoma.经肛门与机器人全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠腺癌的多中心配对比较。
Ann Surg. 2019 Dec;270(6):1110-1116. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002862.
2
Transanal total mesorectal excision: pathological results of 186 patients with mid and low rectal cancer.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术:中低位直肠癌 186 例的病理结果。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2442-2447. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5944-8. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
3
Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.直肠癌全直肠系膜切除质量与环周切缘深度:前20例机器人手术病例的配对比较
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Aug;16(8):603-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12634.
4
Long-term outcomes by a transanal approach to total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的长期疗效。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Dec;31(12):5248-5257. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5597-7. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
5
[Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].[机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术联合或不联合侧方淋巴结清扫治疗中低位进展期直肠癌的短期疗效:一项倾向评分匹配分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):370-376. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20190725-00289.
6
Comparison of transanal total mesorectal excision and robotic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗后经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌的比较
Surg Endosc. 2021 Dec;35(12):6998-7004. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08213-z. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
7
Comparison of early experience of robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision using propensity score matching.采用倾向评分匹配比较机器人与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的早期经验。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Mar;33(3):757-763. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6340-8. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
8
Defining the learning curve for transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal adenocarcinoma.定义直肠腺癌经肛门全直肠系膜切除术的学习曲线。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1534-1542. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6360-4. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
9
[Analysis of robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery on 162 cases with rectal neoplasms].[162例直肠肿瘤患者机器人经自然腔道标本取出手术分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 25;23(4):384-389. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20191017-00453.
10
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Sphincter-Saving Surgery: Results of a Single-Center Series of 400 Consecutive Patients and Perspectives.机器人与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术在保肛手术中的比较:400 例连续患者的单中心系列研究结果及展望。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;25(12):3572-3579. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6738-5. Epub 2018 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Rectal Resection-Experience of a Tertiary Oncology Center.手辅助腹腔镜直肠癌切除术——一家三级肿瘤中心的经验
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 10;14(12):4097. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124097.
2
Predictive model of the surgical difficulty of robot-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a multicenter, retrospective study.直肠癌机器人辅助全直肠系膜切除术手术难度预测模型:一项多中心回顾性研究
J Robot Surg. 2024 Dec 8;19(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02180-6.
3
Utility and challenges of ureteral visualization using a fluorescent ureteral catheter in high risk surgeries for colorectal cancer.
在结直肠癌高危手术中使用荧光输尿管导管进行输尿管可视化的效用和挑战。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):6184-6192. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11211-0. Epub 2024 Sep 12.
4
Peri-operative, oncological and functional outcomes of robotic versus transanal total mesorectal excision in patients with rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌患者的围手术期、肿瘤学和功能结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Jul 1;28(1):75. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02947-x.
5
Evaluating the safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for rectal endometriosis: results from a French prospective multicentre study including 60 patients.评估高强度聚焦超声治疗直肠子宫内膜异位症的安全性:一项纳入60例患者的法国前瞻性多中心研究结果
Hum Reprod. 2024 Aug 1;39(8):1673-1683. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae127.
6
Robotic, transanal, and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for locally advanced mid/low rectal cancer: European multicentre, propensity score-matched study.机器人经肛门、腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗局部进展期中低位直肠癌:欧洲多中心、倾向评分匹配研究。
BJS Open. 2024 May 8;8(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae044.
7
Total mesorectal excision in MRI-defined low rectal cancer: multicentre study comparing oncological outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision in high-volume centres.MRI 定义低位直肠癌全直肠系膜切除术:机器人、腹腔镜和经肛门全直肠系膜切除术在高容量中心的比较肿瘤学结果的多中心研究。
BJS Open. 2024 May 8;8(3). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae029.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive total mesorectal excision versus transanal total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.微创全直肠系膜切除术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的系统评价和Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Jun 12;13:1167200. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1167200. eCollection 2023.
9
Innovation in gastrointestinal surgery: the evolution of minimally invasive surgery-a narrative review.胃肠外科的创新:微创手术的发展——一篇叙述性综述
Front Surg. 2023 May 23;10:1193486. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1193486. eCollection 2023.
10
Outcomes of open vs laparoscopic vs robotic vs transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.直肠癌开放手术、腹腔镜手术、机器人手术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TME)的疗效:一项网状Meta分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 May;27(5):345-360. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02739-1. Epub 2022 Dec 12.