Suppr超能文献

长期护理中抑郁症的风险因素:一项系统综述。

Risk Factors for Depression in Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review.

作者信息

Chau Rebecca, Kissane David W, Davison Tanya E

机构信息

a School of Psychological Sciences , Monash University , Clayton , Victoria , Australia.

b Department of Psychiatry , Monash University , Clayton , Victoria , Australia.

出版信息

Clin Gerontol. 2019 May-Jun;42(3):224-237. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2018.1490371. Epub 2018 Jul 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Depression rates are substantially higher among older adults in long-term care when compared with older adults in the community. Furthermore, the needs of older adults in long-term care are increasingly complex, and risk factors that contribute to depression in this population are unclear. This limits not only the identification of those at risk for depression but also the development of therapeutic interventions. This review summarizes the evidence on risk factors for depression.

METHODS

Searches were performed using CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, PsycINFO and Scopus for research published 1980-2017. Data were reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria, representing a total of 11,703 participants, with a mean sample size of 1,064. The most consistently supported risk factor was cognitive impairment, followed by functional impairment and baseline depression score.

CONCLUSIONS

The studies lacked a systematic approach to investigating risk factors for depression, and the research remains largely atheoretical. Few risk factors were consistently studied, with over 20 risk factors examined no more than once each. Psychological and environmental risk factors, which may be modifiable and have the potential to inform therapeutic interventions and preventative strategies, remain under-studied.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The most consistently supported risk factors-cognitive impairment, functional disability and baseline depression score-have the potential to inform screening protocols and should be monitored longitudinally. When developing psychotherapeutic interventions, close consideration should be given to cognitive and functional impairment as barriers to implementation and uptake.

摘要

目的

与社区老年人相比,长期护理机构中的老年人抑郁发生率要高得多。此外,长期护理机构中老年人的需求日益复杂,导致该人群抑郁的风险因素尚不清楚。这不仅限制了对抑郁风险人群的识别,也限制了治疗干预措施的开发。本综述总结了抑郁风险因素的相关证据。

方法

使用CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、Ovid医学数据库、PsycINFO和Scopus检索1980年至2017年发表的研究。数据报告遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明。

结果

11项研究符合纳入标准,共有11703名参与者,平均样本量为1064。最一致得到支持的风险因素是认知障碍,其次是功能障碍和基线抑郁评分。

结论

这些研究缺乏调查抑郁风险因素的系统方法,研究在很大程度上仍缺乏理论依据。很少有风险因素得到持续研究,超过20种风险因素每项研究次数不超过一次。心理和环境风险因素可能是可改变的,有潜力为治疗干预和预防策略提供依据,但仍研究不足。

临床意义

最一致得到支持的风险因素——认知障碍、功能残疾和基线抑郁评分——有可能为筛查方案提供依据,应进行纵向监测。在制定心理治疗干预措施时,应密切考虑认知和功能障碍对实施和接受的阻碍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验