Sakai Tomomichi, Jadczak Agathe Daria, Khalid Ashna, Piovezan Ronaldo D, Leemaqz Shalem, Visvanathan Renuka
Adelaide Geriatrics Training and Research with Aged Care (GTRAC) Centre, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Department of Community Healthcare and Geriatrics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Australas J Ageing. 2024 Dec;43(4):811-817. doi: 10.1111/ajag.13358. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
Depression is common amongst Australian residential aged care services (RACS) residents. This study aimed to estimate the risk of depression amongst residents and identify factors associated with this risk. In care settings such as RACS, time-efficient screening tools to identify depression risk may be a preferred tool.
The two-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-2), derived from the nine-item PHQ-9 used commonly in the United States (US), was employed in this study. A resident was identified as being at risk of depression where the score was ≥3. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent factors associated with being at risk of depression.
Residents' mean age was 87.7 (standard deviation: 7.3) years and 73% were female. One-fifth of residents (n = 108 or 20%) were at risk of depression. Age (odds ratio [OR] 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-0.99); Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) score (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.11-2.16); Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.13); and 38-item Frailty Index (FI) score (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.03-1.10) were significantly associated with being at risk of depression, whilst sex, urinary incontinence, polypharmacy, Dementia Severity Rating Scale (DSRS) and Nursing Home Life Space Diameter (NHLSD) score were not.
One in five residents were at risk of depression. Younger age, higher pain, higher daytime sleepiness and higher frailty status were associated with depressive risk. Future studies focusing on interventions targeting these factors may contribute to improved health outcomes.
抑郁症在澳大利亚的老年护理机构(RACS)居民中很常见。本研究旨在评估居民患抑郁症的风险,并确定与此风险相关的因素。在RACS这样的护理环境中,用于识别抑郁症风险的高效筛查工具可能是首选工具。
本研究采用了两项患者健康问卷(PHQ-2),该问卷源自美国常用的九项PHQ-9。得分≥3的居民被确定为有抑郁症风险。采用多变量逻辑回归分析来确定与抑郁症风险相关的独立因素。
居民的平均年龄为87.7岁(标准差:7.3),73%为女性。五分之一的居民(n = 108,即20%)有抑郁症风险。年龄(比值比[OR] 0.96,95%置信区间[CI] 0.93 - 0.99);晚期痴呆疼痛评估(PAINAD)得分(OR 1.55,95% CI 1.11 - 2.16);爱泼沃斯嗜睡量表(ESS)得分(OR 1.08,95% CI 1.03 - 1.13);以及38项衰弱指数(FI)得分(OR 1.07,95% CI 1.03 - 1.10)与抑郁症风险显著相关,而性别、尿失禁、多种药物治疗、痴呆严重程度评定量表(DSRS)和养老院生活空间直径(NHLSD)得分则无关。
五分之一的居民有抑郁症风险。年龄较小、疼痛程度较高、白天嗜睡程度较高和衰弱状态较高与抑郁风险相关。未来针对这些因素的干预措施的研究可能有助于改善健康状况。