Bain Katherine, Baradon Tessa
University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
Anna Freud Centre, United Kingdom and University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa.
Infant Ment Health J. 2018 Jul;39(4):371-384. doi: 10.1002/imhj.21715. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
This article is part of a project investigating the interfacing of clinically and research-generated knowledge in the field of infant mental health (IMH) with local cultural models of child care and development. The article explores the experiences and challenges reported by psychology-trained supervisors in supervision with local, lay, trained home visitors. Supervisors and supervisees were drawn from two early intervention programs which apply relational IMH mental health models in socioeconomically deprived townships in South Africa. Literature that considers supervisors' experiences of conducting supervision with lay counselors has been limited, and even more so in settings where there are marked cultural and contextual differences between supervisors and supervisees. These differences pose particular challenges regarding the finding of a shared theoretical understanding of the work as well as to the establishment of a secure working alliance. While it was found that psychoanalytic and attachment-informed theories of infant development are applicable in these South African settings, differences in race, language, education, socioeconomic status, and culture between supervisors and supervisees challenge the supervisor-supervisee relationship and require psychological processing and creative solutions to ensure integrity in the application of the model.
本文是一个项目的一部分,该项目旨在研究婴儿心理健康(IMH)领域临床知识与研究生成知识与当地儿童保育和发展文化模式的衔接。本文探讨了接受过心理学培训的督导员在与当地经过培训的非专业家访员进行督导时所报告的经历和挑战。督导员和被督导员来自两个早期干预项目,这两个项目在南非社会经济贫困的城镇应用关系性IMH心理健康模式。考虑督导员与非专业咨询师进行督导经历的文献有限,在督导员和被督导员之间存在明显文化和背景差异的环境中更是如此。这些差异在对工作达成共同理论理解以及建立稳固工作联盟方面带来了特殊挑战。虽然发现婴儿发展的精神分析理论和依恋理论适用于这些南非环境,但督导员和被督导员在种族、语言、教育、社会经济地位和文化方面的差异对督导员与被督导员的关系构成挑战,需要进行心理调适和创造性解决方案,以确保该模式应用的完整性。