• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)结果与前列腺癌根治术标本最终病理结果在检测前列腺癌方面的准确性比较。

Comparison of the accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) results with the final pathology findings for radical prostatectomy specimens in the detection of prostate cancer.

作者信息

Lee Chan Ho, Ku Ja Yoon, Park Won Young, Lee Nam Kyung, Ha Hong Koo

机构信息

Department of Urology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea.

Department of Urology, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, South Korea.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019 Apr;15(2):e20-e27. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13027. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1111/ajco.13027
PMID:29920966
Abstract

AIMS

To assess the accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), used in conjunction with the Prostrate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), version 2, in the detection of prostate cancer (PCa), and to determine the extent of the efficacy of mpMRI as a screening test in biopsy-naïve patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was conducted in 107 patients who underwent mpMRI prior to radical prostatectomy (RP) at a single institution. The mpMRI findings were reassessed using PI-RADS, version 2. A comparison was made between the histological findings for the RP specimens and the mpMRI results.

RESULTS

Unique histologically confirmed PCa foci (237) were identified in 107 patients. Overall, mpMRI sensitivity of 46% was found for PCa detection (110/237). The sensitivity, specificity and negative predictive value of mpMRI was 75.5%, 77.0% and 79.8%, respectively, for clinically significant cancer, and 75.7%, 77.7% and 79.5%, for pathological index tumors. A moderate and significant correlation was observed between a high PI-RADS score and a high pathological grade, tumor volume, index tumor status and clinically significant cancer status (all, P < 0.001, respectively). Pathological tumor volume was a significant predictor of PCa detection using mpMRI according to multivariate analysis. Using a cut-off value of 0.89 cc, the sensitivity and specificity of mpMRI for PCa detection were 0.87 and 0.65, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The mpMRI, used in conjunction with PI-RADS, was useful in detecting PCa and in predicting tumor aggressiveness. However, the detection of 20% of clinically significant cancer was missed using mpMRI. Thus, its inclusion in a triage test should be limited to selected biopsy-naïve patients.

摘要

目的

评估多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)结合前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)第2版在检测前列腺癌(PCa)方面的准确性,并确定mpMRI作为初诊患者筛查试验的有效程度。

方法

对在单一机构接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)前接受mpMRI检查的107例患者进行回顾性分析。使用PI-RADS第2版重新评估mpMRI结果。将RP标本的组织学结果与mpMRI结果进行比较。

结果

在107例患者中发现了独特的经组织学证实的PCa病灶(237个)。总体而言,mpMRI检测PCa的敏感性为46%(110/237)。对于临床显著性癌症,mpMRI的敏感性、特异性和阴性预测值分别为75.5%、77.0%和79.8%;对于病理指数肿瘤,分别为75.7%、77.7%和79.5%。观察到高PI-RADS评分与高病理分级、肿瘤体积、指数肿瘤状态和临床显著性癌症状态之间存在中度且显著的相关性(所有P均<0.001)。根据多变量分析,病理肿瘤体积是使用mpMRI检测PCa的显著预测指标。使用0.89 cc的临界值,mpMRI检测PCa的敏感性和特异性分别为0.87和0.65。

结论

mpMRI结合PI-RADS有助于检测PCa并预测肿瘤侵袭性。然而,使用mpMRI漏诊了20%的临床显著性癌症。因此,将其纳入分流试验应仅限于选定的初诊患者。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) results with the final pathology findings for radical prostatectomy specimens in the detection of prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)结果与前列腺癌根治术标本最终病理结果在检测前列腺癌方面的准确性比较。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2019 Apr;15(2):e20-e27. doi: 10.1111/ajco.13027. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
2
Evaluation of the accuracy of multiparametric MRI for predicting prostate cancer pathology and tumour staging in the real world: an multicentre study.多参数 MRI 预测真实世界前列腺癌病理和肿瘤分期的准确性评估:一项多中心研究。
BJU Int. 2019 Aug;124(2):297-301. doi: 10.1111/bju.14696. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
3
In-parallel comparative evaluation between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, prostate cancer antigen 3 and the prostate health index in predicting pathologically confirmed significant prostate cancer in men eligible for active surveillance.多参数磁共振成像、前列腺癌抗原3和前列腺健康指数在预测适合主动监测的男性病理确诊的显著前列腺癌方面的平行比较评估
BJU Int. 2016 Oct;118(4):527-34. doi: 10.1111/bju.13318. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
4
Detection of Individual Prostate Cancer Foci via Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.通过多参数磁共振成像检测个体前列腺癌病灶。
Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):712-720. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.031. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
5
Intraindividual Comparison of F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, Multiparametric MRI, and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in Patients with Primary Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective, Proof-of-Concept Study.原发性前列腺癌患者中F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT、多参数MRI与根治性前列腺切除术标本的个体内比较:一项回顾性概念验证研究
J Nucl Med. 2017 Nov;58(11):1805-1810. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.116.189233. Epub 2017 May 4.
6
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.多参数磁共振成像(MRI)和 MRI-经直肠超声融合活检用于检测起始肿瘤:与根治性前列腺切除术标本的相关性。
Eur Urol. 2016 Nov;70(5):846-853. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.052. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
7
Does the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2 improve accuracy in reporting anterior lesions on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)?前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)第 2 版是否能提高多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)报告前位病变的准确性?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Jan;50(1):13-19. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1753-1. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
8
Multiparametric Magnetic-Resonance to Confirm Eligibility to an Active Surveillance Program for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: Intermediate Time Results of a Third Referral High Volume Centre Active Surveillance Protocol.多参数磁共振成像用于确认低风险前列腺癌主动监测计划的入选资格:第三家高转诊量中心主动监测方案的中期结果
Urol Int. 2018;101(1):56-64. doi: 10.1159/000488772. Epub 2018 May 7.
9
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer-a comparative study including radical prostatectomy specimens.多参数磁共振成像在前列腺癌中的应用——一项包括根治性前列腺切除术标本的对比研究
World J Urol. 2017 Jun;35(6):935-941. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1960-x. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
10
Comparison of PI-RADS v1 and v2 for multiparametric MRI detection of prostate cancer with whole-mount histological workup as reference standard.PI-RADS v1 与 v2 对全组织切片病理检查作为参考标准的多参数 MRI 前列腺癌检测的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Jul;116:180-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation of clinically significant prostate cancer sites across multiparametric MRI, prostate biopsy, and whole-mount pathology for optimal prostate biopsy strategy.多参数磁共振成像、前列腺活检和全切片病理检查中具有临床意义的前列腺癌部位的相关性,以制定最佳前列腺活检策略。
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 5;15(1):4310. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-88463-w.
2
Role of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Ratio as Prognostic Factors for Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness.表观扩散系数值及表观扩散系数比率作为前列腺癌侵袭性预后因素的作用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 31;14(21):2438. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14212438.
3
The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI for detection and localization of prostate cancer depends on the affected region.
多参数磁共振成像用于前列腺癌检测和定位的诊断准确性取决于受影响的区域。
BJUI Compass. 2020 Nov 28;2(3):178-187. doi: 10.1002/bco2.62. eCollection 2021 May.
4
Impact of PI-RADS Category 3 lesions on the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for detecting prostate cancer and the prevalence of prostate cancer within each PI-RADS category: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PI-RADS 类别 3 病变对 MRI 检测前列腺癌的诊断准确性的影响以及每个 PI-RADS 类别中的前列腺癌患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Feb 1;94(1118):20191050. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20191050. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
5
Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Pathologic Outcomes in Prostate Cancer.多参数磁共振成像在预测前列腺癌病理结果中的作用
World J Mens Health. 2021 Jan;39(1):38-47. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.200030. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
6
Development and validation of a nomogram including lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio for initial prostate biopsy: a double-center retrospective study.建立并验证包括淋巴细胞与单核细胞比值的列线图在初次前列腺穿刺活检中的应用:一项双中心回顾性研究。
Asian J Androl. 2021 Jan-Feb;23(1):41-46. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_19_20.