• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Epidemiology of Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome in Patients at a Colorado Comprehensive Stroke Center.科罗拉多综合卒中中心患者可逆性脑血管收缩综合征的流行病学
J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2018 Jun;10(1):32-38.
2
Isoflavones and gastrointestinal infection: Two potential triggers for reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.异黄酮与胃肠道感染:可能引发可逆性脑动脉收缩综合征的两个潜在触发因素。
Cephalalgia. 2018 Apr;38(5):984-987. doi: 10.1177/0333102417714245. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
3
Ischaemic strokes with reversible vasoconstriction and without thunderclap headache: a variant of the reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome?伴有可逆性血管收缩且无霹雳样头痛的缺血性卒中:可逆性脑血管收缩综合征的一种变体?
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;39(1):31-8. doi: 10.1159/000369776. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
4
Hemorrhagic reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: A retrospective observational study.出血性可逆性脑动脉收缩综合征:一项回顾性观察研究。
J Neurol. 2021 Feb;268(2):632-639. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10193-y. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
5
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome identification of prognostic factors.可逆性脑血管收缩综合征预后因素的识别
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;115(11):2351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
6
Characteristics and demographics of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome: A large prospective series of Korean patients.可逆性脑血管收缩综合征的特征和人口统计学:一项大型韩国前瞻性系列患者研究。
Cephalalgia. 2018 Apr;38(4):765-775. doi: 10.1177/0333102417715223. Epub 2017 Jun 7.
7
Recurrent Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome: A Report of Two Cases.复发性可逆性脑血管收缩综合征:两例报告
Cureus. 2023 Aug 5;15(8):e42992. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42992. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Predictors and outcomes of hemorrhagic stroke in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.可逆性脑血管收缩综合征中出血性卒中的预测因素及预后
J Neurol Sci. 2021 Feb 15;421:117312. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117312. Epub 2021 Jan 7.
9
Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome Without Typical Thunderclap Headache.无典型霹雳样头痛的可逆性脑血管收缩综合征
Headache. 2016 Apr;56(4):674-87. doi: 10.1111/head.12794. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
10
Predictors and outcomes of ischemic stroke in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.可逆性脑血管收缩综合征相关脑梗死的预测因素及结局。
J Neurol. 2021 Aug;268(8):3020-3025. doi: 10.1007/s00415-021-10456-2. Epub 2021 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Advances in Management of the Stroke Etiology One-Percenters.卒中病因百分之一患者管理的新进展。
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2023 Jun;23(6):301-325. doi: 10.1007/s11910-023-01269-z. Epub 2023 May 29.
2
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome associated with probable drug poisoning.与疑似药物中毒相关的可逆性脑血管收缩综合征
Radiol Case Rep. 2022 Dec 20;18(3):844-849. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.11.044. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Pleasure and Displeasure: Thunderclap Headache in a 13-Year-Old Boy.愉悦与不悦:一名13岁男孩的霹雳样头痛
Child Neurol Open. 2021 Oct 4;8:2329048X211034360. doi: 10.1177/2329048X211034360. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
4
Illicit Drugs and Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome.非法药物与可逆性脑血管收缩综合征
Neurohospitalist. 2021 Jan;11(1):40-44. doi: 10.1177/1941874420953051. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
5
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) caused by over-the-counter calcium supplement ingestion.因服用非处方钙补充剂引起的可逆性脑血管收缩综合征(RCVS)。
BMJ Case Rep. 2021 Jan 28;14(1):e233877. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-233877.
6
Marijuana-related Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome.大麻相关的可逆性脑血管收缩综合征。
Intern Med. 2021 Mar 1;60(5):795-798. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.5687-20. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
7
Headache in cerebrovascular diseases.脑血管病所致头痛。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2020 Jun;5(2):205-210. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000333. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
8
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome revealed by fronto-callosal infarctions.额胼胝体梗死揭示的可逆性脑血管收缩综合征
Acta Neurol Belg. 2020 Dec;120(6):1467-1469. doi: 10.1007/s13760-020-01319-0. Epub 2020 Mar 10.

本文引用的文献

1
Maternal marijuana use, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and neonatal morbidity.孕妇使用大麻、不良妊娠结局和新生儿发病率。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;217(4):478.e1-478.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.05.050. Epub 2017 May 31.
2
Strokes are possible complications of cannabinoids use.中风是使用大麻素可能出现的并发症。
Epilepsy Behav. 2017 May;70(Pt B):355-363. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.01.031. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
3
Marijuana Legalization and Parents' Attitudes, Use, and Parenting in Washington State.华盛顿州大麻合法化与父母的态度、使用情况及育儿方式
J Adolesc Health. 2016 Oct;59(4):450-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.07.004. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
4
Hemorrhagic Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome: Features and Mechanisms.出血性可逆性脑血管收缩综合征:特征与机制
Stroke. 2016 Jul;47(7):1742-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.013136. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
5
What Do We Know Now About the Impact of the Laws Related to Marijuana?我们现在对与大麻相关法律的影响有哪些了解?
J Addict Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;10(1):3-12. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0000000000000188.
6
Marijuana induced Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome.大麻诱发的可逆性脑血管收缩综合征。
J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2015 Feb;8(1):36-8.
7
Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome, Part 1: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Clinical Course.可逆性脑血管收缩综合征,第1部分:流行病学、发病机制及临床病程
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015 Aug;36(8):1392-9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A4214. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
8
Cannabis use: signal of increasing risk of serious cardiovascular disorders.大麻使用:严重心血管疾病风险增加的信号。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Apr 23;3(2):e000638. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000638.
9
Clinical worsening in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome.可逆性脑动脉收缩综合征的临床恶化。
JAMA Neurol. 2014 Jan;71(1):68-73. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.4639.
10
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome identification of prognostic factors.可逆性脑血管收缩综合征预后因素的识别
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Nov;115(11):2351-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.08.014. Epub 2013 Sep 7.

科罗拉多综合卒中中心患者可逆性脑血管收缩综合征的流行病学

The Epidemiology of Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome in Patients at a Colorado Comprehensive Stroke Center.

作者信息

Jensen Judd, Leonard Jan, Salottolo Kristin, McCarthy Kathryn, Wagner Jeffrey, Bar-Or David

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Swedish Medical Center, Englewood, CO, USA.

Blue Sky Neurology, Englewood, CO, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2018 Jun;10(1):32-38.

PMID:29922403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5999310/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Vasoactive substances, including marijuana, are known precipitating factors of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS). Our objective was to describe the demographics, suspected etiology, and outcomes of RCVS patients, with specific interest in examining the subset of patients who used marijuana prior to the onset of RCVS.

METHODS

We identified and described consecutive RCVS cases treated at a regional, high-volume Comprehensive Stroke Center in Colorado (2012-2015). Univariate analyses were performed to examine the associations between the characteristics and outcomes (stroke and discharge disposition) of the RCVS patients by precipitating factors. We compared patients who used marijuana to those who did not and patients who used marijuana to patients who used vasoactive substances aside from marijuana.

RESULTS

Forty patients had RCVS. Sixteen (40%) cases were deemed idiopathic and 24 (60%) were secondary to a suspected trigger. Vasoactive substances were the most common suspected trigger ( = 18/24, 75%), 6 (33%) of which were marijuana. Approximately 80% of patients experienced an intracranial hemorrhage, 20% had an ischemic stroke, and yet 78% were discharged home. Patients with RCVS secondary to marijuana were more often male ( = 0.05) and younger ( = 0.02) compared to those who did not use marijuana; no differences were observed in the outcomes. These findings were consistent when examining marijuana versus other vasoactive substances.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests there are demographic differences between patients with RCVS triggered by marijuana compared to the typical RCVS patient. As more states legalize marijuana, medical conditions such as RCVS and their association with marijuana warrants further study and awareness.

摘要

目的

血管活性物质,包括大麻,是已知的可逆性脑血管收缩综合征(RCVS)的诱发因素。我们的目的是描述RCVS患者的人口统计学特征、疑似病因和预后,特别关注检查在RCVS发病前使用过大麻的患者亚组。

方法

我们识别并描述了在科罗拉多州一家区域大容量综合卒中中心接受治疗的连续RCVS病例(2012 - 2015年)。进行单因素分析以通过诱发因素检查RCVS患者的特征与预后(中风和出院处置)之间的关联。我们将使用过大麻的患者与未使用过大麻的患者进行比较,并将使用过大麻的患者与使用除大麻外的血管活性物质的患者进行比较。

结果

40例患者患有RCVS。16例(40%)病例被认为是特发性的,24例(60%)继发于疑似诱因。血管活性物质是最常见的疑似诱因(24例中的18例,75%),其中6例(33%)是大麻。大约80%的患者发生了颅内出血,20%发生了缺血性中风,但仍有78%的患者出院回家。与未使用大麻的患者相比,继发于大麻的RCVS患者男性更多(P = 0.05)且更年轻(P = 0.02);在预后方面未观察到差异。在比较大麻与其他血管活性物质时,这些发现是一致的。

结论

本研究表明,与典型的RCVS患者相比,由大麻引发的RCVS患者存在人口统计学差异。随着越来越多的州将大麻合法化,诸如RCVS等医学病症及其与大麻的关联值得进一步研究和关注。