• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Positive outcomes, mortality rates, and publication bias in septic shock trials.

作者信息

de Grooth Harm-Jan, Parienti Jean-Jacques, Postema Jonne, Loer Stephan A, Oudemans-van Straaten Heleen M, Girbes Armand R

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Intensive Care, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2018 Sep;44(9):1584-1585. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5258-x. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-018-5258-x
PMID:29922845
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Positive outcomes, mortality rates, and publication bias in septic shock trials.感染性休克试验中的阳性结果、死亡率及发表偏倚
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Sep;44(9):1584-1585. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5258-x. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
2
Early outcome of early-goal directed therapy for patients with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者早期目标导向治疗的早期结局：一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Oncotarget. 2017 Apr 18;8(16):27510-27519. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15550.
3
Primary Outcome Measures in Pediatric Septic Shock Trials: A Systematic Review.儿科感染性休克试验的主要结局指标：一项系统评价
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;18(3):e146-e154. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001078.
4
Protocol-Based Resuscitation for Septic Shock: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies.基于方案的感染性休克复苏：随机试验和观察性研究的荟萃分析
Yonsei Med J. 2016 Sep;57(5):1260-70. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.5.1260.
5
Comparison of the effects of albumin and crystalloid on mortality in adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.白蛋白与晶体液对成年重症脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者死亡率影响的比较：一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2014 Dec 15;18(6):702. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0702-y.
6
The efficacy and safety of plasma exchange in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血浆置换在脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者中的疗效与安全性：一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Crit Care. 2014 Dec 20;18(6):699. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0699-2.
7
Effect of early goal-directed therapy on mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.早期目标导向治疗对严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者死亡率的影响：一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 1;6(3):e008330. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008330.
8
Benefits and harms of red blood cell transfusions in patients with septic shock in the intensive care unit.重症监护病房中感染性休克患者红细胞输血的益处与危害
Dan Med J. 2016 Feb;63(2).
9
The Effect of Early Goal-Directed Therapy on Outcome in Adult Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.早期目标导向治疗对成年严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者预后的影响：一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析
Anesth Analg. 2016 Aug;123(2):371-81. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001278.
10
Days alive and free as an alternative to a mortality outcome in pivotal vasopressor and septic shock trials.作为主要血管加压药和脓毒性休克试验死亡率结局的替代指标，存活天数和无残疾天数。
J Crit Care. 2018 Oct;47:333-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends in ICU mortality and underlying risk over three decades among mechanically ventilated patients. A group level analysis of cohorts from infection prevention studies.机械通气患者三十年间重症监护病房死亡率及潜在风险的趋势。感染预防研究队列的群组水平分析。
Ann Intensive Care. 2023 Jul 11;13(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01159-0.
2
Association Between Prospective Registration and Quality of Systematic Reviews in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-epidemiological Study.前瞻性注册与2型糖尿病系统评价质量之间的关联：一项Meta流行病学研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jun 28;8:639652. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.639652. eCollection 2021.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Unexplained mortality differences between septic shock trials: a systematic analysis of population characteristics and control-group mortality rates.不明原因的脓毒性休克试验死亡率差异：人群特征和对照组死亡率的系统分析。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Mar;44(3):311-322. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5134-8. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
2
Reproducibility of clinical research in critical care: a scoping review.危重病临床研究的可重复性：范围综述。
BMC Med. 2018 Feb 21;16(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1018-6.
3
The intensive care medicine research agenda on septic shock.
Powering Bias and Clinically Important Treatment Effects in Randomized Trials of Critical Illness.
在危重病随机试验中驱动偏倚和具有临床重要意义的治疗效果。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):1710-1719. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004568.
4
A six‑gene support vector machine classifier contributes to the diagnosis of pediatric septic shock.一个六基因支持向量机分类器有助于儿科感染性休克的诊断。
Mol Med Rep. 2020 Mar;21(3):1561-1571. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2020.10959. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
5
Focus on sepsis.关注脓毒症。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Oct;45(10):1459-1461. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05680-4. Epub 2019 Jul 2.
脓毒症休克的重症监护医学研究议程。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Sep;43(9):1294-1305. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4821-1. Epub 2017 May 12.
4
What patient data should be collected in this randomized controlled trial in sepsis?在这项脓毒症随机对照试验中应收集哪些患者数据？
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):2011-2013. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4560-8. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
5
Control groups in recent septic shock trials: a systematic review.近期脓毒症休克试验中的对照组：一项系统性综述。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Dec;42(12):1912-1921. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4444-y. Epub 2016 Jul 23.