Suppr超能文献

青少年 1 型糖尿病患者的连续血糖监测和血糖控制:来自 T1D Exchange 和 DPV Initiative 的国际比较。

Continuous glucose monitoring and glycemic control among youth with type 1 diabetes: International comparison from the T1D Exchange and DPV Initiative.

机构信息

Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida.

出版信息

Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Nov;19(7):1271-1275. doi: 10.1111/pedi.12711. Epub 2018 Jul 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To assess the change in rates of pediatric real-time or intermittent scanning continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use over the past 5 years, and how it impacts glycemic control, data from two registries were compared: the US-based type 1 diabetes Exchange Registry (T1DX) and the German/Austrian DPV (Prospective Diabetes Follow-Up Registry).

METHODS

Registry participants aged <18 years with T1D duration ≥1 year encompassed 29 007 individuals in 2011 and 29 150 participants in 2016. Demographic data, CGM use and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) were obtained from medical records.

RESULTS

CGM use increased from 2011 to 2016 in both registries across all age groups, regardless of gender, ethnic minority status or insulin delivery method. The increase in CGM use was most pronounced in the youngest patients, and usage rates remain lowest for adolescent patients in 2016. For both registries in 2016, mean HbA1c was lower among CGM users regardless of insulin delivery method compared to pump only (P < 0.001) and injection only (P < 0.001), and CGM users were more likely to achieve glycemic target of HbA1c <7.5% (56% vs 43% for DPV and 30% vs 15% for T1DX, P < 0.001). T1DX participants had a higher mean HbA1c compared with DPV despite whether they were CGM users or non-users; however, the difference was less pronounced in CGM users (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric CGM use increased in both registries and was associated with lower mean HbA1c regardless of insulin delivery modality.

摘要

背景

为了评估过去 5 年来儿科实时或间歇性扫描连续血糖监测(CGM)使用率的变化,以及它如何影响血糖控制,我们比较了两个注册中心的数据:美国 1 型糖尿病交换注册中心(T1DX)和德国/奥地利 DPV(前瞻性糖尿病随访注册中心)。

方法

该注册研究纳入了年龄<18 岁、糖尿病病程≥1 年的参与者,共纳入了 2011 年的 29007 人和 2016 年的 29150 人。从病历中获取了人口统计学数据、CGM 使用情况和糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)。

结果

在两个注册中心,所有年龄组的 CGM 使用量都从 2011 年增加到 2016 年,无论性别、少数民族身份或胰岛素输送方式如何。在最年轻的患者中,CGM 使用量的增加最为明显,而在 2016 年,青少年患者的 CGM 使用量仍最低。在 2016 年,对于两个注册中心,无论胰岛素输送方式如何,与仅泵(P<0.001)和仅注射(P<0.001)相比,CGM 用户的平均 HbA1c 更低,并且 CGM 用户更有可能达到 HbA1c<7.5%的血糖目标(56%与 DPV 相比,30%与 T1DX 相比,P<0.001)。尽管 T1DX 参与者是 CGM 用户还是非 CGM 用户,与 DPV 相比,他们的平均 HbA1c 都更高;然而,在 CGM 用户中,这种差异不那么明显(P<0.001)。

结论

两个注册中心的儿科 CGM 使用量都有所增加,并且无论胰岛素输送方式如何,都与较低的平均 HbA1c 相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c9b/6221088/b4e31832c0fe/PEDI-19-1271-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验