• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典施行的种植体支持修复治疗的技术并发症。

Technical complications following implant-supported restorative therapy performed in Sweden.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Odontology, University of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jun;29(6):603-611. doi: 10.1111/clr.13271. Epub 2018 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1111/clr.13271
PMID:29923628
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the occurrence and consequences of technical complications in implant-supported restorative therapy.

MATERIAL & METHODS: The occurrence and consequences of technical complications in implant-supported restorative therapy over a mean follow-up period of 5.3 years were assessed based on documentation in files from 2,666 patients. Risk indicators were identified by the use of survival models, considering repeated events. Results were expressed as hazard ratios (HR) including 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Technical complications occurred in 24.8% of the patients. Chipping and loss of retention were the most common, affecting 11.0% and 7.9% of supraconstructions, respectively, while implant-related complications (e.g., implant fracture) were rare. More than 50% of the affected patients experienced technical complications more than once and almost all reported complications led to interventions by a dental professional. The extent of the supraconstruction was the strongest risk indicator for both chipping (HR < 0.2) and loss of retention (HR > 3).

CONCLUSION

Over a 5-year period, technical complications in implant-supported restorative therapy occurred frequently and their management required professional intervention.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估种植体支持修复治疗中技术并发症的发生和后果。

材料与方法

基于 2666 名患者的档案记录,评估了种植体支持修复治疗中技术并发症在平均 5.3 年随访期内的发生和后果。使用生存模型确定风险指标,考虑重复事件。结果以包括 95%置信区间的风险比(HR)表示。

结果

24.8%的患者发生了技术并发症。崩瓷和固位丧失最为常见,分别影响了 11.0%和 7.9%的修复体,而与种植体相关的并发症(如种植体骨折)则较为罕见。超过 50%的受影响患者经历了不止一次的技术并发症,几乎所有报告的并发症都需要口腔专业人员进行干预。修复体的范围是崩瓷(HR<0.2)和固位丧失(HR>3)的最强风险指标。

结论

在 5 年期间,种植体支持修复治疗中的技术并发症频繁发生,需要专业干预来处理。

相似文献

1
Technical complications following implant-supported restorative therapy performed in Sweden.瑞典施行的种植体支持修复治疗的技术并发症。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Jun;29(6):603-611. doi: 10.1111/clr.13271. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
2
A 5-Year Retrospective Assay of Implant Treatments and Complications in Private Practice: The Restorative Complications of Single and Short-Span Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.私人诊所种植治疗及并发症的5年回顾性分析:单颗及短跨度种植支持固定义齿的修复并发症
Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Sep-Oct;29(5):435-44. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4794.
3
Mechanical and technical risks in implant therapy.种植体治疗中的机械和技术风险。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:69-85.
4
Short-term complications of implant-supported and combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.种植体支持和联合牙种植体支持固定义齿的短期并发症。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Jul;24(7):758-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02482.x. Epub 2012 May 9.
5
A systematic review of biologic and technical complications with fixed implant rehabilitations for edentulous patients.一项关于无牙患者固定种植修复体的生物学和技术并发症的系统评价。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Jan-Feb;27(1):102-10.
6
Split-Mouth Comparison of Splinted and Nonsplinted Prostheses on Short Implants: 3-Year Results.短种植体上夹板式与非夹板式修复体的分口对照研究:3年结果
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016 Sep-Oct;31(5):1135-41. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4565.
7
Effectiveness of implant therapy analyzed in a Swedish population: early and late implant loss.瑞典人群中种植体治疗效果分析:早期和晚期种植体脱落
J Dent Res. 2015 Mar;94(3 Suppl):44S-51S. doi: 10.1177/0022034514563077. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
8
All-on-4® Treatment Concept for the Rehabilitation of the Completely Edentulous Mandible: A 7-Year Clinical and 5-Year Radiographic Retrospective Case Series with Risk Assessment for Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Level.全口4颗种植体治疗理念用于无牙下颌骨修复:一项7年临床及5年影像学回顾性病例系列研究,评估种植体失败及边缘骨水平风险
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 2:e531-41. doi: 10.1111/cid.12282. Epub 2014 Dec 23.
9
Demographics of implant placement and complications of a patient subgroup in a dental hospital population.牙科医院人群中患者亚组的种植体植入人口统计学和并发症
J Ir Dent Assoc. 2010 Apr-May;56(2):85-92.
10
Monolithic and Minimally Veneered Zirconia Complications as Implant-Supported Restorative Material: A Retrospective Clinical Study up to 5 Years.整体式和最小饰面氧化锆并发症作为种植体支持修复材料:长达 5 年的回顾性临床研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Oct 15;2020:8821068. doi: 10.1155/2020/8821068. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors Affecting Dental Implant Failure: A Retrospective Analysis.影响牙种植失败的因素:一项回顾性分析。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 6;13(12):1356. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121356.
2
Ten-Year Survival of Single Implants With Veneered Porcelain on Zirconia or Titanium Abutments: A Retrospective Analysis.氧化锆或钛基台上带烤瓷贴面单颗种植体的十年生存率:一项回顾性分析
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Apr;27(2):e70026. doi: 10.1111/cid.70026.
3
Dental Implant Rehabilitation in Patients Carrying WNT10A Mutations With Different Molecular Statuses and Phenotypes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
携带不同分子状态和表型的WNT10A突变患者的牙种植修复:一项回顾性队列研究
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Apr;36(4):505-517. doi: 10.1111/clr.14402. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
4
The effect of three dental cement types on the corrosion of dental implant surfaces.三种牙科粘固剂类型对牙种植体表面腐蚀的影响。
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 16;10(1):e23626. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23626. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
5
Effect of Er,Cr:YSGG laser with a side-firing tip on decontamination of titanium disc surface: an in vitro and in vivo study.侧向发射Er,Cr:YSGG 激光对钛盘表面消毒效果的体外与体内研究。
Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Feb 20;9(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00469-z.
6
A retrospective comparison of clinical outcomes of implant restorations for posterior edentulous area: 3-unit bridge supported by 2 implants vs 3 splinted implant-supported crowns.后牙缺失区种植修复临床效果的回顾性比较:2颗种植体支持的3单位桥与3颗联冠种植支持式全冠的比较
J Adv Prosthodont. 2022 Aug;14(4):223-235. doi: 10.4047/jap.2022.14.4.223. Epub 2022 Aug 29.
7
Comparison of porcelain veneer fracture in implant-supported fixed full-arch prostheses with a framework of either titanium, cobalt-chromium, or zirconia: An in vitro study.种植体支持的固定全牙弓修复体中钛、钴铬或氧化锆框架的瓷贴面骨折比较:一项体外研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2022 Apr;8(2):544-551. doi: 10.1002/cre2.558. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
8
Clinical and radiographical performance of implants placed with simultaneous guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes after 22-24 years, a prospective, controlled clinical trial.22-24 年后,使用可吸收和不可吸收膜进行同期引导骨再生的种植体的临床和影像学表现:一项前瞻性、对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Dec;32(12):1455-1465. doi: 10.1111/clr.13845. Epub 2021 Oct 3.
9
Two short implants versus one short implant with a cantilever: 5-Year results of a randomized clinical trial.两段式短种植体与一段式短种植体加悬臂梁:一项随机临床试验的 5 年结果。
J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Nov;48(11):1480-1490. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13541. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
10
Single-crown restorations supported by short implants (6 mm) compared with standard-length implants (13 mm) in conjunction with maxillary sinus floor augmentation: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.短种植体(6 毫米)支持的单冠修复与上颌窦底提升联合使用标准长度种植体(13 毫米)的比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Jul 16;7(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00348-5.